We're discussing the number of 300+ teams we've scheduled in recent years and the whole risk vs. reward of those. What about this: don't schedule any non-conference games with a lower projected ranking than what we would expect the upcoming season's weakest B1G team to be.
We couldn't follow it perfectly, of course, since some games are scheduled more in advance than that, but use it as a general guideline. Thoughts?
We couldn't follow it perfectly, of course, since some games are scheduled more in advance than that, but use it as a general guideline. Thoughts?
