I don't know about non-revenue sports but PU basketball and football are putting themselves in positions to be successful for the next few seasons. Both have been putting together some good recruiting classes.
Lol. You don't even know if PU will make the NCAA's next year. Painter has had back-to-back losing seasons after losing all of his players.
Volleyball, track, and golf are good. Diving has Had recent Olympic medalists, Waz had baseball almost win the conference tournament last year and will bounce back from this season when his players mature. Then of course football and basketball are in good spots like you mentioned. Women's basketball needs to get it together though.
The present. Go talk about it and your dusty accomplishments on the football site.
Jimmy and Jimbo are Purdue obsessed trolls who post exclusively about everything Boilermaker. They aren’t IU fans or knowledgeable about the University or its sports programs. Pay them no attention.
Last season, after losing 4 senior starters PU went to the Elite 8 game. As usual y'all are going back into the past. Perhaps you are talking in 2013 after the Moore, Hummel, Johnson era. This upcoming season, they lose Edwards and Cline. PU will be a more balanced team and perhaps a better team than last season. It won't be a matter of making the tourney, its whether what seed they will get. I predict another 3 seed.
Good to know. They don't seem knowledgable in much of anything.
Why the hell are you putting my username on posts that someone else made? You're losing it now jimbo
What does that say about IU coaching if they have our recruited PU only to lose to them on the court?
For one thing this is a 6 page thread about a Purdue recruit.
I was under the impression that place dried up a long time ago. They have to go somewhere, and all they talk about is IU, anyways.
At least you tried. Doesn't dwarfism impact your lifespan? Archie better get it turned around quick if so.
Hey moron! how many NCAA titles does Purdue have overall? Not a sports school. It is hard to attract the top notch athletes there. Even in the non revenue sports. Get some titles loser! I guess you get your kicks when you are slightly better than IU. So sad!
That must make the head to head results recently hard to swallow.
Takes a big man to admit that on his own board. Proud of you.
A HoF coach and an actual player vs a fan.
You still here? Scurry on back to the PU site, or whatever is left of it, and talk about IU there. Do you even post on PU sites or just hang out on IU sites?
Things were settled on the court in 1940, and the NCAA (and IU) came out on top: that is how things get settled in every tournament in every sport. By 1953, the NCAA was clearly better than the NIT. Not to mention the players, coaches, and teams that played and coached in the NCAA's since the start. History has vindicated the NCAA's and its methods: it is what it is.
That's it Jimbo, keep up the fight in proving those championships 66 and 79 years ago get the respect they deserve! They were much more important than a championship decided by a bakery as you put it!
Where did I state that IU wasn’t the best team in the country in 1940 or 1953? Please be very specific.
They are NCAA championships that were decided on the court, not by a baker. Don't crap on something that you haven't achieved. It is sour grapes and makes you look bad.
ive said plenty of times in this thread idc about those. I'm glad you have them to cling to for your sake but even if they were Purdue championships they wouldn't be anything more than a banner and added trivia to talk about for me.
If you don't care about the banners, then cease talking about them: nobody has a gun to your head. This is an IU site. Most programs are proud of their tradition: if you want to crap on it without having accomplished it, then f off. It doesn't mean anybody is clinging to anything or living in the past. Rather, those are your strawmen that you have set up in an attempt to crap on IU's tradition. Grow the hell up and cut out the sour grapes nonsense.
The great thing about written word is we can go back and see who wrote what.
I can talk about whatever I want to. This is an IU site. This is not a PU site. You are a guest. I'm not traveling to a PU site and acting like a dick, you are. You are the one who has stated you don't care about banners: then shut the hell up about them! Most other programs are proud of their tradition and talk about it: neither I nor anybody else has to subscribe to your beliefs. I've seen posters like you in the past, and I predict you aren't going to last too long around here.
lol it's a site for discussing sports. This thread is about a Purdue player. Don't be so sensitive and if you don't want me to give my opinion on banners ranging 30 - 80 years ago then don't bring them up to me when I'm speaking with a completely different poster here about a completely different topic.
