ADVERTISEMENT

Monkey Pox - Call a Spade a Spade

LOL. Yes. Damit. That’s my issue. It’s like saying birthing person instead of a pregnant woman. Call it what it is Damit! It’s gay men.
I'm not defending them being so reticent about saying "gay men", but "men having sex with men" isn't really pulling any punches. And the "birthing person" bullshit is idiotic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: anon_6hv78pr714xta
Yea, I know ... but it has no real definition so it can be used just like it was .. you woke person. lol

Did you hear DeSantis' woke Churchill speech? "We will fight the woke on the beaches, we will fight the woke in the fields " that guy is a clown pandering to the very bottom of our societal barrel...
I don’t disagree with Churchill.
 
I love that shitter and the rest of these clowns pretend there's no such thing as woke. so stupid. it's all over. hell obama recognizes it. my kid was recently in a play at summer camp where all of the characters names were changed to gender neutral names. WOKE AS F*UCKKKKKKKK YESSSSSSSSS. Like Potter Stewart - we all know it when we see it, unless we have our heads in the sand....

This is happening


And this is the proper response
 
So The NY Times is hyper-conservative?

not grasping your point in the slightest, so guessing you're just trolling, but on things economic in nature, it absolutely is conservative.

very pro corporate/wealthy might be more accurate.

that said, on social issues, gays and trans and blacks and browns and women and media can be conservative as well, and many are.

and being pro LGBTQ or pro black etc can take a "conservative" stance, if it's unfairly or disproportionately done so at the expense of and without the consideration of others.

blacks promoting blacks not being equally held accountable for their actions because they are black, is a conservative stance by the blacks or whites promoting it, not a liberal one.

trans or pro trans promoting M-F transgenders competing in women's sports, is a conservative, not a liberal stance.

a true liberal trans or pro trans would realize that a M-F trans competing in women's sports is inherently unfair to the born female, even if it is exclusive to them.

being pro minority isn't inherently a liberal stance just because it's pro minority.

if the stance is to unfairly benefit the minority at the expense of others, then it's a conservative stance, just as when a majority individual or group wants to unfairly benefit that majority at the expense of others.

it's the unfairly benefiting one over another, or not doing so, that makes a stance conservative or liberal.

not which group or individual is unfairly benefiting at another's expense.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT