Today I read an article explaining how difficult it was for a smaller program such as St. Peter's to compete with the so called Blue Bloods." The article stated that the facilities, and budget of the "Blue Bloods" would turn any NBA G league team green with envy. The article implied that talent, facilities and budget make it inevitable that these kind of teams will triumph over the smaller schools. Does anyone know how I.U. compares to these schools in regard to facilities, and budget. From what I've read, I.U. is comparable or superior to these teams in regard to facilities and budget. The only area where I.U. is deficient is in regard to coaching and talent. Good coaching gives you success which enables a school to get better talent. That being said, isn't it true that I.U. has never had the talent level that the current "Blue Bloods" possess. Traditionally, they have always done more with less. I would like other people's opinion on this issue.
Kansas, Duke, and North Carolina Compared to I.U.
- Thread starter bunkF
- Start date
