Roll of toilet paper for this post. Goofy…A guy that plays a specific role, schematically. (Not that Wooden really has much of a game plan)
Should have put it “could be” one of the best role players in the big ten.
Roll of toilet paper for this post. Goofy…A guy that plays a specific role, schematically. (Not that Wooden really has much of a game plan)
Should have put it “could be” one of the best role players in the big ten.
This draft class is supposed to be weak. Like 2013 weak. So MM should go if that’s true.Wouldn't surprise me if someone gambled a 2nd rounder on him, but also wouldn't if he went undrafted. That sweet stroke will be appealing to teams, and someone might feel they can coach him up on D and play, and I'd guess someone can. But, I do think he'd benefit the most from coming back and really working on his handle, decision making, D and explosiveness. I think there's a lot of potential there.
I like him ..I'm for him.Chris Reynolds....Tom Coverdale....Braden Smith....all say "Hello".
Look, I'm not saying Gabe is the next Braden Smith because they're both shorter white dudes...but to say Gabe is lacking in strength (one of the strongest guys on the team) or anything else is ridiculous. He's been thrown into a starting position on a team the lacks any sort of continuity or structure (sorry CMW, very easy to see this). Half the team doesn't know what the hell they're running on O and on D the other half acts like they've never played that end of the court in their life. Gabe is in the middle of this CF and trying to make it work all while looking like at least a mid-level B10 PG.
Chris Reynolds was a hell of a defender...however he sucked as a freshman all the way around, but was playing with a ton of other freshmen. Coverdale didn't see the light of day until RMK was gone. Braden has been paired with the best college player in the game for his two years AND is in a perfect system with possibly the best coach in the B10....and yet he's often still exposed.
Now if GC is playing like this his Junior year and has a coach that knows his arse from 3rd base, I'll agree. At this time though, anyone that gives up on this kid or pigeon holes him as nothing more than a back up PG in the B10 is off their rocker IMO.
I agree, he has a lot of potential. I question how coachable he is. He has multiple examples on his own team of what playing hard looks like, and a former NBA coach to explain it, but he still has deficiencies.Wouldn't surprise me if someone gambled a 2nd rounder on him, but also wouldn't if he went undrafted. That sweet stroke will be appealing to teams, and someone might feel they can coach him up on D and play, and I'd guess someone can. But, I do think he'd benefit the most from coming back and really working on his handle, decision making, D and explosiveness. I think there's a lot of potential there.
Eh, Cav says MM says he will leave for any NBA opportunity, drafted or not, although its not clear what that really means.I think they can meet with NBA people who tell them their draft position. If he is not draftable, and he takes their advice, he will play another year. Here or somewhere else. Here he obviously starts so that is a plus for us
It means he's only in college because that's his path to get to the NBA. NIL makes this even more attractive because other alternatives such as playing G-League, OTE, or overseas for a year after high school do not pay as much as popular players can earn with NIL and college ball has a larger audience.Eh, Cav says MM says he will leave for any NBA opportunity, drafted or not, although its not clear what that really means.
He needs a bit more strength, size and experience to really blossom. All of those are easily attained.Anybody that has written Cupps off as a starter at IU is nuts. He is more than solid defensively and once he gains confidence on the offensive end; he will be a very good all-around starting point guard in the BIG.
The kid is a winner.
Thanks for that clarification of the 5th hand information on the future of a 19 year old. I'll take it to the bank.It means he's only in college because that's his path to get to the NBA. NIL makes this even more attractive because other alternatives such as playing G-League, OTE, or overseas for a year after high school do not pay as much as popular players can earn with NIL.
Remember he is a frosh. On past teams he would see less than 10 minutes a game. We really have not seen his potential.Yes the freshman wall but I look at him and don't think he does anything well. I'm fine with him as a backup but just don't see him ever being a starter at Indiana or we're in trouble.
Couldn't disagree much more. With everything in your post.He needs a bit more strength, size and experience to really blossom. All of those are easily attained.
He may be able to work his way into the 2nd round with an extraordinary finish but as of right now he's slated as going undrafted. It would be a gamble to go this year but he'll do what he wants to do ..This draft class is supposed to be weak. Like 2013 weak. So MM should go if that’s true.
I’m not saying he’s “any round material”. I’m just saying if he’s bent on going in the draft then this one is weak. The next two supposedly aren’t. From the sounds of it he is one foot out. Who knows. I sure don’t.He may be able to work his way into the 2nd round with an extraordinary finish but as of right now he's slated as going undrafted. It would be a gamble to go this year but he'll do what he wants to do ..
He has no moves, which means he has no way to get separation without help. Plus his awareness is lacking currently, much better than Nov but he's still getting lost at times.
Yeah, I wasn't arguing ... just letting my mouth run so I could hear myself talk and be impressed by it.. lmao.I’m not saying he’s “any round material”. I’m just saying if he’s bent on going in the draft then this one is weak. The next two supposedly aren’t. From the sounds of it he is one foot out. Who knows. I sure don’t.
If Mack leaves, in my opinion, it will end up being 100% him betting on himself. I don't see him getting drafted this year, in any round.Wouldn't surprise me if someone gambled a 2nd rounder on him, but also wouldn't if he went undrafted. That sweet stroke will be appealing to teams, and someone might feel they can coach him up on D and play, and I'd guess someone can. But, I do think he'd benefit the most from coming back and really working on his handle, decision making, D and explosiveness. I think there's a lot of potential there.
Will show if his ego or outside factors ruin his chance.Yeah, I wasn't arguing ... just letting my mouth run so I could hear myself talk and be impressed by it.. lmao.
He has small hands and though long he doesn't have much of a wingspan. Couple that with a lack of quickness laterally and no real explosiveness.. and it's killed his draft prospects. Doesn't have the extreme athleticism or measurables for his position, so he needs a highly proficient skill set .. or a high IQ and court awareness.
He needs another year or two and needs to work his ass off this summer to develop a better handle. The awareness and better defense should come with experience.. or not.
And he's not a good ballhandler. He's basically a 3 and D guy that can't defend. And he's been very average from 3. Though I do believe he is a plus shooter, just hasn't shown it this year from distance. 32% from 3.He may be able to work his way into the 2nd round with an extraordinary finish but as of right now he's slated as going undrafted. It would be a gamble to go this year but he'll do what he wants to do ..
He has no moves, which means he has no way to get separation without help. Plus his awareness is lacking currently, much better than Nov but he's still getting lost at times.
Outside the obvious defensive problems Mack has with being a 3 and D guy...which is absolutely what his role will end up being when/if he ever makes it... But outside that, he isn't athletic enough. And his ball skills aren't good enough.And he's not a good ballhandler. He's basically a 3 and D guy that can't defend. And he's been very average from 3. Though I do believe he is a plus shooter, just hasn't shown it this year from distance. 32% from 3.
Right after you started providing these lineup stats, Woody shortened his bench significantly.Update on best three man combinations
Cupps/Trey/Kel now 16th nationally. Miya only cites one 3 man combination per team. So no idea where Cupps/Trey/Malik are currently .. but couldn't have fallen far...
I would guess if he did 4 man lineups .. IU would be sitting pretty good.
Woody has to start keeping the starters in as long as possible... it's just a much better team 1 thru 5 than it is 6 thru 9. Quit giving away leads ..
lol ...Right after you started providing these lineup stats, Woody shortened his bench significantly.
If you have him paying attention, send him some thoughts on how to get the fellas to play consistently harder...for longer stretches.
And then maybe once he picks up on that...send him some clips of teams running good movement based offenses for more than 6-7 second bursts.
Klay ... not saying he is but that should be his goal.Outside the obvious defensive problems Mack has with being a 3 and D guy...which is absolutely what his role will end up being when/if he ever makes it... But outside that, he isn't athletic enough. And his ball skills aren't good enough.
Outside the older guys like PJ Tucker, nearly all the 3 and D guys are long, athletic, dunkers, rebounders out of their own space, etc... Mack isn't long. He has average NBA athleticism. And he rarely ever rebounds out of his own space.
I see some of these lineups Woodson has out there in the middle of the 1st half and think, wtf is he doing. And then the lead goes from 12 to 2 at halftime. Or we go from tied to down 10 at half. It's like he Woodson hates having the lead.Update on best three man combinations
Cupps/Trey/Kel now 16th nationally. Miya only cites one 3 man combination per team. So no idea where Cupps/Trey/Malik are currently .. but couldn't have fallen far...
I would guess if he did 4 man lineups .. IU would be sitting pretty good.
Woody has to start keeping the starters in as long as possible... it's just a much better team 1 thru 5 than it is 6 thru 9. Quit giving away leads ..
I don't see the potential plus Woodson hasn't developed anybody. Cupps needs to work on his shot to be effective he fades away when he shoots.Remember he is a frosh. On past teams he would see less than 10 minutes a game. We really have not seen his potential.
Yup, almost every game. It was fine in preseason almost everyone plays deeper, and you have to give the scrubs a chance but once it hits Jan .. it should be cut.I see some of these lineups Woodson has out there in the middle of the 1st half and think, wtf is he doing. And then the lead goes from 12 to 2 at halftime. Or we go from tied to down 10 at half. It's like he Woodson hates having the lead.
Woodson won't adapt. We need to hope for a change.Yup, almost every game. It was fine in preseason almost everyone plays deeper, and you have to give the scrubs a chance but once it hits Jan .. it should be cut.
I think he coached so long in the pros that he doesn't have the same respect other coaches do for possessions... there's 4 times as many in an NBA season vs college .. in NCAA you can't give a single one away, NBA ball half the season is entertainment. It's just a different mindset ..
Hopefully he adapts ..
Meh ... I quit playing the coaching carousel game after Crean.. it's a tired non productive conversation equal to politics .. Plus it's counter productive to what we want. This fanbase has a reputation, good and bad. It's passionate, but currently toxic. I want no part of that..Woodson won't adapt. We need to hope for a change.
There are too many good players when you consider international players. He is not on any draft radars for even the second round. Zero chance he is drafted. Zero.Wouldn't surprise me if someone gambled a 2nd rounder on him, but also wouldn't if he went undrafted. That sweet stroke will be appealing to teams, and someone might feel they can coach him up on D and play, and I'd guess someone can. But, I do think he'd benefit the most from coming back and really working on his handle, decision making, D and explosiveness. I think there's a lot of potential there.
Can’t disagree with that. Keep the rotation tight. I might argue to still give Gunn a little bit of a chance since he can guard and has a knack for getting in the passing lanes.Meh ... I quit playing the coaching carousel game after Crean.. it's a tired non productive conversation equal to politics .. Plus it's counter productive to what we want. This fanbase has a reputation, good and bad. It's passionate, but currently toxic. I want no part of that..
Maybe he already has .. though not completely .. the lineups and rotations in that 2nd half vs OSU was about as good as it can get. Keep the same rotations through the whole of the next game add Sparks to beat up on Edey for a bit ...
Banks has been benched, CJ should be. Sparks also except against Edey, and Walker needs his minutes limited.. Stick with top 5, and Leal .. for a majority... bring Walker in for defense only...
Someone that dates a Purdue Cow-ed.... they probably have plenty rolls to play with..what’s a “roll player”?
He isn’t getting drafted. He isn’t on any team radars. He currently is not flashing NBA potential. But he could get there if he improves on some glaring weaknesses in the next 2 years.Eh, Cav says MM says he will leave for any NBA opportunity, drafted or not, although its not clear what that really means.
Just for consideration Overall shooting Cupps 39.7% from 3 : 39,1%There are too many good players when you consider international players. He is not on any draft radars for even the second round. Zero chance he is drafted. Zero.