Looks like those posters who predicted that there was only one legitimate outcome for you were correct. You don't care if she's guilty. You only care if she is indicted. Too bad.
Zuckerberg has oneBut I want my wall! China has one, why cant we?
Read Hugh Hewitt's article this morning at RealClearPolitics.com
From experience I have never had a client who was indicted and or officially charged that was not guilty. Convicted is a totally separate issue. HRC is guilty of violating official government rules if not statutes she is guilty beyond any doubt and from her own admissions however that being said it appears she will not be indicted. The whole thing stinks of "Clinton" but my error was believing in the justice system. There appears to be one for the haves and one for the have nots.
Have you had many criminal clients? We've put innocent people on death row, I can't help but believe something as simple as an indictment (which a ham sandwich can be) has a high false positive rate.
Hundreds I was a private and public defender for years. We have had innocent people on death row no question but few and far between. The real world is the police do a very good job of arresting the guilty. As attorney you do what you can to plead or find flaws in their case and do what it takes to win.
I'm ashamed to say that entire affair is news to me. (Not the firing of the attorneys, but the extent of the email hosting concerns.)
I don't recall multiple congressional investigations either.
Then someone with authority to do so should instigate an investigation of the Bush doings. There is absolutely no doubt - from the known public information - that Clinton violated the espionage laws of the nation by allowing well over 3000 classified messages to be passed over her unsecured system. Each occurance is a separate felony. Then there is the corrupt influence of her position as Secretary of State being abused for her own personal benefit (and for the Clinton Foundation - which brings Bill Clinton into the investigation). Then there are the crimes committed in covering all this up. Then there is lying to the FBI - unless she took the 5th on all questions they asked her Saturday. Start adding those up and you have thousands of crimes. No Presidential candidate in the history of the country has ever sought the office while under criminal investigation.
If not preapproved and confidential info transmitted thereon absolutely. At least I would hope so.
Sigh...how many times have I corrected this exact post word for word? You refuse to learn anything. Pay attention: from what is publicly known, we do not know if any crimes were committed. For a crime to be committed, classified information had to end up where it wasn't allowed, and it had to be done with someone's knowledge or due to gross negligence. The simple fact that those emails exist is not enough to prove a crime, no matter how many times you repeat it.
Don't fret, your people will be on her ass from day one of her presidency. Wasting our tax dollars on investigation after investigation. It's what you people do best. To hell with actually trying to do good things for the country.
Yeah your dems have done so much to better this country. Like the last eight years have been the worst in history. But it was Bush's fault and still is i imagine in your world.
I can't wait until the Dems take control of Congress so we can investigate Bush & Cheney for war crimes. Over and over and over again. That will be fun.
Lets not forget that after her vote to go to war it took her about two weeks to start this campaign. 15 years and she is going to win it. She is going to one cold hard leader.
It's not the same thing, but Marvin's point is still valid. The people who are wringing their hands over this (supposed/apparent) lack of an indictment don't have a long history of complaining about our broken justice system, which shows that the hand-wringing isn't about fairness or justice, it's about Hillary.
