I haven’t shamed or directed hatred at all in this thread. Nor have I condemned anyone. It’s a lifestyle choice….and yes I have friends that live that lifestyle
How will the LBGTQ/Democrat//Media complex respond?
- Thread starter CO. Hoosier
- Start date
Here is what I be,ieve to be true.
Sex is never assigned at birth. Sex is at birth.
Thoughts and feelings can’t change sex.
Young people are more susceptible to peer pressure, and the power of suggestion. This is especially true when trusted adults are suggesting. (The law has a sentencing enhancement for child abuse by a trusted adult)
When a kid thinks they are a different sex, an adult is in the picture 100% of the time and that adult is enabling.
Sex change in adults and kids is 100% self report. It isn’t objective science.
And before goat gets his undies in a bundle, people with biological anomalies are not part of this discussion.
Last edited:
I’ve heard this argument for decades. It doesn’t hold water for me. People are not so easily generalized. .
Didn't say you did.
And no you don't. You have acquaintances. If you were truly a friend you'd understand them. Which you don't.
you've fought the good fight on this thread, but what can you do? maybe the least shocking thing ever is that some dudes on this board are claiming to have otherworldly, Jesus-like boner control. just in time for Easter. fvcking phenomenal.
Oh my God. The things you think you know, that are so so wrong. Calling other people simple minded is just the cherry on top.
One of my friends lives in Houston and is a physician…he will tell you it is a lifestyle choice.
Four young (3 mid-twenties and 1 early-thirties, all college graduates) people at Easter lunch today. Every single one voting Republican.
Don’t be so presumptuous as to think you know how young people will vote.
Or the consequences of the emphasis on that lifestyle and culture pushing it. I saw a guy at target wearing a t shirt that read:
I Drank One Bud Light.
Now I’m a Bottom 🤣
Last edited:
Serious question: if it is so exceedingly rare (and I think true gender dysphoria is), then why is it brought up disproportionately in the left media? TV shows? Discussion and concern by Biden and the admin?
It feels like both sides are feeding off this element of the culture wars. It's not just the Right (and they do, no doubt). If you think Biden made his proclamation for any other reason than politics, then I think you might be too generous to his motives.
For me, it pisses me off because it has invaded science, even at the university level, which evinces more ideological activism that is blunting the truth-seeking, free inquiry that should be protected there. Go read Coyne's blog. He documents a lot of it. It's also made its way up to at least one SCt justice, so that should be discussed.
Last edited:
. . . and it has nothing to do with transgenderism.This.
Birth Rates Are Plummeting in Most Nations, And The World Isn't Prepared
Human birth rates will continue to drop drastically over the coming century, and within just 25 years, over two-thirds of countries' populations will be in decline.www.sciencealert.com
Our changing attitudes about what it means to be a human and reproduce is one of many factor.s. It is a net negative.
I don't think you consciously choose who you love and who you don't.
I’m sure it’s a choice for some - but also biological and learned. Male victims of sexual abuse are more likely to be gay than those not abused - and that isn’t choice. That’s something else. Something terrible. Not being gay - that’s not terrible - but the push towards it from an abuser.
That is the majority of lesbians in my experience. Horrible, abusive male relationship and they shut it off for men afterwards.
Not making a value judgement on their decision, I get it. But it’s not biological.
I agree with you about the some being a learned behavior. I will quote my gay friend who is a physician “there is nothing in biology or chemistry that supports not being a lifestyle choice….and I’m sure as hell not a different species”.
I am willing to have my mind changed on the subject but I’ve never been shown anything concrete to support the alternative.
I guess it depends what you mean by a "lifestyle choice." One can certainly wall off one's sexuality. But if you're defining gay, as I do, as based on to whom you are attracted, then no, I don't think that's a choice.
From personal experience, I've never chosen which types of women I'm attracted to, nor have I chosen to be revolted by the idea of sex with a man or even seeing two men be sexually affectionate or active.
And if the activity of gay sex is a "choice," are we to conclude that ~5-10% of dogs, cattle, rams, etc. are making "choices?"
You’re saying that you can put a bitch that is in heat in a pen with a male dog and 10% of the male dogs will try to climb out of the cage? They are going to breed. Why? It’s instinct. He’s not sitting there cocking his head thinking about it. The only way this doesn’t happen is if the male sex organs did not properly develop. I have seen this in deer. You notice it because the bucks do not shed the velvet on their antlers in the fall.
We probably will not agree but that’s what makes the world interesting.
Cheers
I'm saying not every male dog will try to have sex with another male dog. Some do, though. I'm sure we've all seen it. I have no idea on the percentages though.
That would not occur if there was a female that was in heat in this scenario. They would be jockeying for position…and not on each other. Instincts, instincts, instincts. Not a learned behavior.
I guess I'll plead ignorance on that.
As for the instinct thing, I agree. I think homosexuality in humans is also instinct, for them. As for your friend's statement that he's not another species, of course he's not. There can be a lot of variation in behavior and instinct in a species.
Ok, I am 100% satirical comedy and self owning of my own stupidity...
I'm not getting it. Lil' help?
IT seems that this theme is prevalent in the LGBTABCDQ world. I feel there needs to be some grass way of understanding that some totally terrible men, are caused by absolutely batshit crazy women. It seems that the lecture is easily becoming that the guy is always wrong, when in history even, the man has historically been demanded to be strong, yet bendable. The strong man sets the base, but requires the input from his partner.
I find today, with 4 daughters, what used to be "strong yet bendable" has became "shove it up your ass", I'm told and educated that I am a victim and I'm bringing fire down on you oppressors. ... At which time, provides there is no clear captain of the boat, and it's adrift, so to speak. only because an emotional power won't consed, but can't lead either. Women equal lose lose (generally). .... NOT that immature men are much better, but at least they know accuracy in failing quickly.
Even if the shitty men are formed by terrible women.
It’s not prospective female partners responsibility to reform the shitty men.
We all must become a kind, intelligent and affable person on our own accord. Can’t cite your parents anymore.
I'm gonna feel stoopid.. that's ok.
I'm stil not getting it. What am I over looking?
a bud light now I'm a bottom...
???????
Do you know what a bottom and a top are in the world of gay men? If not, @larsIU can tell you (because he plays frisbee golf).
I would totally agree, the way you frame that answer, which was very simplistic to what I said over all. I never proposed that future females fix broken males. That's akin to a burnt down barn, putting a horse back into the ashes and expect it to simply stand there.
I do not, and apparently I don't want to know and I will most definitely stop asking now!!! I honestly thought it was some very simple slight of hand....... wait.. No I don't need to know anymore. Thank you and I am sorry, I didn't think it was complicated like this. MA Bad!
Similar threads
