That all makes for a nice story but the whole premise of these grand notions of Herculean scoring feats is flawed. Before the 3 pt. shot, defenses were built inside out. The simple math was that the closer the ball was to the basket, the tighter the defense. If a guy wanted to launch a low-percentage shot from 25-30 feet away, what the hell. Let him have it. In fact, prior to the influence of Bob Knight, half-court pressure defense was not a consideration. You played between your man and the basket, and guarded closely only when the ball was within 15 feet or so of the basket.even if true, that does not add up to 96. you know, 28 x 3 = ____
no free throws? zero shots inside 20? and all in multiple games where he scored 56 points for iu? how many games was that? sorry, a nice story but i'm going to have to call bs. lol. i bet he had to trudge through 3 feet of snow from the dorm to the fieldhouse before each game. too.
Comparing players of different eras is amusing, but given the changes in the way the game is played and the impact of changes in the rules, it offers very little practical value to any argument about how good any past player would be in today's game. The old-timers would need a very different skill set to succeed in today's game.