Projection much? Which influential Republicans or sitting members of Congress have proposed not certifying if Harris wins?
Projection much? Which influential Republicans or sitting members of Congress have proposed not certifying if Harris wins?
I'm not projecting at all. Trump is clearly setting up a fight if he loses. He hasn't changed. Of course, you're one of the morons that believed the lie about 2020. Little secret for you - Trump doesn't believe his lie, he just uses it to rile up the morons among his minions.Projection much? Which influential Republicans or sitting members of Congress have proposed not certifying if Harris wins?
🔥🔥🔥🔥. Dbm. It’ll be crushing!! CRUSHING IF HE LOSES. Thank God we at least have THE PROBLEM CHILD TYSON fight the next week@mcmurtry66 He is now invading blue states while wearing a Dark MAGA hat and walking out to the Undertaker theme music. We are not losing!!!
You’ll need to set up a suicide watch rotation for dbm if Trump loses.🔥🔥🔥🔥. Dbm. It’ll be crushing!! CRUSHING IF HE LOSES. Thank God we at least have THE PROBLEM CHILD TYSON fight the next week
I'm not projecting at all. Trump is clearly setting up a fight if he loses. He hasn't changed. Of course, you're one of the morons that believed the lie about 2020. Little secret for you - Trump doesn't believe his lie, he just uses it to rile up the morons among his minions.
Should we list all the examples where Trump has shifted away from wacko right wing positions to tack to the center and give himself a chance to win? Like saying a woman should be punsihed for getting an abortion, at a time when Roe vs Wade was still the law of the land?
My wife is her own person and does what she wants with the exception of being unfaithful. She knows if she cheated her ass is out of the house.I know how my wife is voting because she told me, but I don’t tell her who to vote for. How about you guys?
So all the whining, pre emptive claims of "cheating" and ridiculous stunts like this...
Does that sound like a campaign that believes it is "winning"? This action exemplifies the desperate nature of resorting to a Hail Mary. It's a perfect combination of both whining and claiming pre-emptively that he was "cheated"... Anyone else would be embarrased to try and pull such a ridiculous stunt...
ETA-Aloha beat me to the punch. But I'll go ahead and leave my post intact because I think the Meidas Touch video contains context that the Axios story doesn't. Like why Trump chose that particular district and judge for his ridiculous lawsuit...
Any serious, reliable and objective news organization would be embarrassed to have done this in the first place.
Big News rigging public information to influence an election is a fact and isn’t news. But I don’t know of any way information rigging is actionable. The USA is only as good as the people, and we have daily examples of the people who hold power and influence not being very good.So all the whining, pre emptive claims of "cheating" and ridiculous stunts like this...
Does that sound like a campaign that believes it is "winning"? This action exemplifies the desperate nature of resorting to a Hail Mary. It's a perfect combination of both whining and claiming pre-emptively that he was "cheated"... Anyone else would be embarrased to try and pull such a ridiculous stunt...
ETA-Aloha beat me to the punch. But I'll go ahead and leave my post intact because I think the Meidas Touch video contains context that the Axios story doesn't. Like why Trump chose that particular district and judge for his ridiculous lawsuit...
Msm influence with zero journalistic integrity and the oversized influence of billionaires needs to be addressed. No idea how. Can’t go back to the fairness doctrine. Obviously. But billionaires that should be doable. Particularly in remote races with no meaningful connectionAny serious, reliable and objective news organization would be embarrassed to have done this in the first place.
put people in stocks, then throw tomatoes and heads of lettuceMsm influence with zero journalistic integrity and the oversized influence of billionaires needs to be addressed. No idea how. Can’t go back to the fairness doctrine. Obviously. But billionaires that should be doable. Particularly in remote races with no meaningful connection
How do we deal with social media? Musk bombed my Twitter threads yesterday and I had to scroll through a lot of his pro-GOP and Trump posts. I didn’t want any of that.Msm influence with zero journalistic integrity and the oversized influence of billionaires needs to be addressed. No idea how. Can’t go back to the fairness doctrine. Obviously. But billionaires that should be doable. Particularly in remote races with no meaningful connection
I have no ideaHow do we deal with social media? Musk bombed my Twitter threads yesterday and I had to scroll through a lot of his pro-GOP and Trump posts. I didn’t want any of that.
We're probably going to eventually have to give up on the idea that democracy is a non-negotiable part of government.I have no idea
But you have no concerns about GOP led states certifying a Harris win? I mean, they did it 4 years ago and Trump will be leading the charge to do it again.As we get closer is anyone worried? Specifically about the political makeup up the Administrations in the swing states? Are we really to expect Hobbes, Whitmer, Shapiro, Evers and their respective Democrat SoS to certify a close race should Trump win? That Michigan SoS, particularly, appears to have escaped from the looney bin. But seriously, you can't certify, you can't certify fascists and Hitler.
Good chance something about this election makes it's way before the Supreme Court, which makes me feel slightly better. Still that assumes all votes are counted completely and correctly.
@dbmhoosier what does our oversight look like on the ground? Legal teams in place besides Giuliani? We're going to need it.
Don't be ridiculous. The only elected officials who have tried to avoid certifying election results have been Republicans. Stop projecting.As we get closer is anyone worried? Specifically about the political makeup up the Administrations in the swing states? Are we really to expect Hobbes, Whitmer, Shapiro, Evers and their respective Democrat SoS to certify a close race should Trump win? That Michigan SoS, particularly, appears to have escaped from the looney bin. But seriously, you can't certify, you can't certify fascists and Hitler.
Good chance something about this election makes it's way before the Supreme Court, which makes me feel slightly better. Still that assumes all votes are counted completely and correctly.
@dbmhoosier what does our oversight look like on the ground? Legal teams in place besides Giuliani? We're going to need it.
Good questions. And that dirty hot lawyer. She didn’t know you had to ask for a jury. Probably keep her on the benchAs we get closer is anyone worried? Specifically about the political makeup up the Administrations in the swing states? Are we really to expect Hobbes, Whitmer, Shapiro, Evers and their respective Democrat SoS to certify a close race should Trump win? That Michigan SoS, particularly, appears to have escaped from the looney bin. But seriously, you can't certify, you can't certify fascists and Hitler.
Good chance something about this election makes it's way before the Supreme Court, which makes me feel slightly better. Still that assumes all votes are counted completely and correctly.
@dbmhoosier what does our oversight look like on the ground? Legal teams in place besides Giuliani? We're going to need it.
Not really. Should she win Georgia, I expect Kemp and Raffensberger would certify again. That's really the only one in play for her. I guess Nevada has a Republican Governor, but I'm not sure he's super Trumpy.But you have no concerns about GOP led states certifying a Harris win? I mean, they did it 4 years ago and Trump will be leading the charge to do it again.
I guess congress could restrict in some fashion digital political advertising. And if there’s no nexus between the billionaire and the community restrict giving. If Soros wants to fund a progressive DA here I’m not okay with that. If David steward wants to do it I am okay with it. He’s part of the community. Even if is outsized purse tips the scales to a candidate I hate. That’s life.We're probably going to eventually have to give up on the idea that democracy is a non-negotiable part of government.
Deal with it. What you want isn’t important.How do we deal with social media? Musk bombed my Twitter threads yesterday and I had to scroll through a lot of his pro-GOP and Trump posts. I didn’t want any of that.
Right. The Democrats do their election rigging before votes are counted. The Republicans trying to change things post election is a fools errand.Don't be ridiculous. The only elected officials who have tried to avoid certifying election results have been Republicans. Stop projecting.
We have as good a ground game as Republicans have ever had. Eyes and ears everywhere watching for any shenanigans. And no Shapiro and Whitmer do not want Harris to win.As we get closer is anyone worried? Specifically about the political makeup up the Administrations in the swing states? Are we really to expect Hobbes, Whitmer, Shapiro, Evers and their respective Democrat SoS to certify a close race should Trump win? That Michigan SoS, particularly, appears to have escaped from the looney bin. But seriously, you can't certify, you can't certify fascists and Hitler.
Good chance something about this election makes it's way before the Supreme Court, which makes me feel slightly better. Still that assumes all votes are counted completely and correctly.
@dbmhoosier what does our oversight look like on the ground? Legal teams in place besides Giuliani? We're going to need it.
I thought the same of Shapiro at least. He seems opportunistic. A Trump win sets him up nicely for 2028 run.We have as good a ground game as Republicans have ever had. Eyes and ears everywhere watching for any shenanigans. And no Shapiro and Whitmer do not want Harris to win.
Good. I think Trump should campaign an entire week there and spend his entire ad budget trying to get those 4 NH electoral votes.
Turns out George Orwell wrote nonfiction.I guess congress could restrict in some fashion digital political advertising. And if there’s no nexus between the billionaire and the community restrict giving. If Soros wants to fund a progressive DA here I’m not okay with that. If David steward wants to do it I am okay with it. He’s part of the community. Even if is outsized purse tips the scales to a candidate I hate. That’s life.
Kamala’s profound inadequacies will be apparent shortly after taking office for those who still think she can do the job. Shapiro will still be in the catbird seat unless the public realizes that he is the person who put her in office.I thought the same of Shapiro at least. He seems opportunistic. A Trump win sets him up nicely for 2028 run.
You blew a good chance to prove your point.Doesn't matter. See Fetterman.
I mean...I thought X was a private entity? If you didn't like the feed or censorship, you could always start your own...like Truth Social or something, right?How do we deal with social media? Musk bombed my Twitter threads yesterday and I had to scroll through a lot of his pro-GOP and Trump posts. I didn’t want any of that.