ADVERTISEMENT

Gamma-ray burst

Marvin the Martian

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Sep 4, 2001
37,515
24,194
113
I suspect everyone has heard that we recorded the largest gamma-ray burst humanity has ever witnessed. Of course, since we haven't had much time in observing them, that alone doesn't mean a whole lot. But it was enormous compared to everything else we have seen.


And we are very lucky it was so far away. Anything like that in our half of the Milky Way and we could be in a world of hurt. From a Facebook group I belong to:

Fortunately for us this event wasn't in our galaxy. If this GRB would have happened in "our side" of the Milky Way galaxy our atmosphere would have immediately turned dark red as the gamma rays quickly depleted much of the Earth's protective ozone layer, allowing an increase in solar UVB radiation to reach the surface and most life on Earth would be either dead or dying. For the "typical" nearest GRBs in the last billion years, global average ozone depletion up to 38% and localized depletion up to 74% occurred. This radiation damages DNA many times normal (well above lethal levels for simple life forms like phytoplankton) and causes severe sunburns to humans. In addition, NO2 produced in the atmosphere would have caused a decrease in visible sunlight reaching the surface, Nitric acid rain would stress portions of the biosphere, and the entire Earth would be heading into a long massive global deep freeze (for thousands of years).​
Any life within a few tens of thousands of light years of this GRB was likely destroyed.​

It is pretty incredible to consider an event that could kill almost all life within something like 20,000 lightyears.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockport Zebra
I suspect everyone has heard that we recorded the largest gamma-ray burst humanity has ever witnessed. Of course, since we haven't had much time in observing them, that alone doesn't mean a whole lot. But it was enormous compared to everything else we have seen.


And we are very lucky it was so far away. Anything like that in our half of the Milky Way and we could be in a world of hurt. From a Facebook group I belong to:

Fortunately for us this event wasn't in our galaxy. If this GRB would have happened in "our side" of the Milky Way galaxy our atmosphere would have immediately turned dark red as the gamma rays quickly depleted much of the Earth's protective ozone layer, allowing an increase in solar UVB radiation to reach the surface and most life on Earth would be either dead or dying. For the "typical" nearest GRBs in the last billion years, global average ozone depletion up to 38% and localized depletion up to 74% occurred. This radiation damages DNA many times normal (well above lethal levels for simple life forms like phytoplankton) and causes severe sunburns to humans. In addition, NO2 produced in the atmosphere would have caused a decrease in visible sunlight reaching the surface, Nitric acid rain would stress portions of the biosphere, and the entire Earth would be heading into a long massive global deep freeze (for thousands of years).​
Any life within a few tens of thousands of light years of this GRB was likely destroyed.​

It is pretty incredible to consider an event that could kill almost all life within something like 20,000 lightyears.
So the question raised by this post . . . is whether the effect of this GRB anything close to the effect a tactical nuclear weapon would have in Ukraine?
 
So the question raised by this post . . . is whether the effect of this GRB anything close to the effect a tactical nuclear weapon would have in Ukraine?

For humanity, an a-bomb in Ukraine is probably worse. But I haven't seen any updates on what happened to our ozone layer. Since I haven't seen the alarmist "we are all going to die" media, I assume no one is worried about that from this event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sope Creek
Bring it...
th_coffee.gif



 
For humanity, an a-bomb in Ukraine is probably worse. But I haven't seen any updates on what happened to our ozone layer. Since I haven't seen the alarmist "we are all going to die" media, I assume no one is worried about that from this event.
For the record, I was being cheeky . . . the article says that all life within tens of thousands of light years would be gone with this GRB. That's more than what a tactical nuke would do, isn't it? ;)

BTW, one of my most consistent fears is what climate change might do to the ozone layer. I haven't seen any reports re: that . . . .
 
Last edited:
BTW, one of my most consistent fears is what climate change might do to the ozone layer. I haven't seen any reports re: that . . . .
I do not think that the common greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides) are inherently damaging to ozone, as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)were determined to be. Recall, CFCs were banned worldwide in the 1970s, a rare display of policy actually following science and showing that human effects on global climate chemistry are both real and are sometimes, at least, reversible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sope Creek
I do not think that the common greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides) are inherently damaging to ozone, as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)were determined to be. Recall, CFCs were banned worldwide in the 1970s, a rare display of policy actually following science and showing that human effects on global climate chemistry are both real and are sometimes, at least, reversible.
. . . and heat? What's the effect of heat on the ozone layer?
 
. . . and heat? What's the effect of heat on the ozone layer?

Studies show the ozone layer is improving. So I am not sure heat has been a problem.

 
Since I haven't seen the alarmist "we are all going to die" media, I assume no one is worried about that from this event.
Did it provide the location of Hunter's laptop, Hillary's emails, Matt Gaetz's child porn lair, the pee tapes, Joe Biden's chinese bank accounts, or anything similar?
 
Did it provide the location of Hunter's laptop, Hillary's emails, Matt Gaetz's child porn lair, the pee tapes, Joe Biden's chinese bank accounts, or anything similar?

You know how it is. If an astronomer says a comet needs to be watched because it comes relatively close to earth in 75 years, the news headline is "Comet on a collision course with earth, we are all doomed".
 
You know how it is. If an astronomer says a comet needs to be watched because it comes relatively close to earth in 75 years, the news headline is "Comet on a collision course with earth, we are all doomed".
Define "relatively close to earth".

And we are all doomed . . . perhaps not by the comet . . . but doomed nonetheless.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT