ADVERTISEMENT

Gabbard a Terrorist

Go Tulsi Go. Expose these frauds. The one Democrat that I thought might of been different was Obama but apparently he is the worst one of them all. He is probably at the top of the list of reasons there is such a big divide in this country.

Oh the irony. He has had it with unregistered voters. F off dude. Your current presidential candidate didn't even receive a primary vote. Maybe if your party could run a fair primary, people would come out and vote. Tell us what you really mean that your fed up with the people not listening to your propaganda BS about Democracy is at risk. BTW Mr Ex-President Dumbass. Go Tulsi Go!!!!!! I respect the hell out of Tulsi Gabbard in the world where you think women get no respect.

 
Yea, his "trigger" has always went off much quicker than mine. :)

Shooting Old West GIF by Robert E Blackmon
 
I believe you're a fraud, so I doubt that what I'm going to share with you change your opinion, but do advise.

The report that TG was placed on the TSA's "Open Skies" program came from UncoverDC. Their source is Sonya Hightower LaBosco, who has publicly gone on record confirming the truth of the allegations. Ms. LaBosco is the Executive Director of AMNC, which is a national advocacy group for Federal Air Marshals (FAMs).. She states that according to several of her members FAMs were first assigned to the Gabbard 'detail' on July 23rd, with their first flight being July 25th. Both Gabbard and her husband are on the list. As per TSA practice, neither were told that they had made the list. The original story by UndercoverDC included a photo of TG that came from the "Target Package" used by the FAMs to surveil Gabbard.

Quiet Skies focuses on suspected domestic terrorists. UndercoverDC had previously broken stories about other Quiet Skies targets. including an infant son of an individual who had attended the J6 protests, and 2 other individuals who had attended the protests or had been in DC on that date. None were ever charged with any crime. LaBosco and AMNC President David Londo have testified concerning their concerns that TSA has been violating the rights of conservatives in a "big domestic surveillance grab".

TG has stated that she and her husband found that their boarding passes were marked with "SSSS" which stands for "Quad S", the mark of the beast for TSA. She did not know why until the story came to public light, but she knew she had just lately been experiencing extensive and intrusive searches, including searched by dogs. She did not know that there were FAMs on her flight assigned to her and her husband. She said that on another flight she was unable to get through security with military ID, as she had done in the past. She inquired, and a TSA agent commented on the SSSS marker. She said the agent asked "Why are you Quad S? You're in the military" to which she replied "That's exactly what I'm wondering". It is important to note that LaBosco did not speak to Gabbard prior to the UncoverDC story being published.

On August 11th, 3 Hawaiian house representatives sent a letter accusing the TSA of including TG on the Quiet Skies watchlist, and accusing TSA of harassment of TG and her husband on multiple flights. They asked that she be withdrawn from the list immediately and that full public transparency be provided. As far as I can tell, there has been no reply.

On August 8th Congressman Tim Burchett wrote the TSA administrator requesting a meeting to discuss the report. There has been no meeting.

Congressman James Comer, Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, also sent a letter to the TSA. Comer asked that certain specific materials be delivered to the Committee, a briefing with the Committee no later than August 30th, and receipt of the documents and communications requested by September 6th. As far as I'm aware, none of that has occurred. Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has made similar demands and requests. On 8/22, Rand Paul, ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Govt Affairs Committee inquired about the Gabbard case and other reports of TSA abuse of the Open Skies program. He requested that relevant listed documents be delivered to the Committee by Sept. 4th. There is no indication of compliance with the request.

There has been NO denial of the allegations by the TSA. I have not seen one media report denying the allegations, although there may have been 100+ reporting them.

Admiral, are you ok with this state of affairs? How do you square it with your highly developed sense of honor?
rear Admiral Gilligan's alleged sense of honor has principles...

Like all reach-around republicrats, he has those principles...if you don't like them, he has other principles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
rear Admiral Gilligan's alleged sense of honor has principles...

Like all reach-around republicrats, he has those principles...if you don't like them, he has other principles.
You've become quite the little ankle biter. You must be proud. I'm still waiting for the link to the site he copied all that from. I'm wondering if it's a Russian propaganda site like the ones you visit. You didn't answer the question about whether you got paid for sharing Russian propaganda or if they just consider you a useful idiot who will do it without pay. Which is it?
 
You've become quite the little ankle biter. You must be proud. I'm still waiting for the link to the site he copied all that from. I'm wondering if it's a Russian propaganda site like the ones you visit. You didn't answer the question about whether you got paid for sharing Russian propaganda or if they just consider you a useful idiot who will do it without pay. Which is it?

Is this good enough for you to collect my winnings?

Trump’s intel pick was placed on government watch list for overseas travel and foreign connections

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Hoopsdoc1978
So you went from betting 1000 dollars that she wasn’t put on any list to “well, it’s not a terrorist watch list”.

😂

Fascinating.
Nope. Any list? The assertion was she was put on the Terrorist Watchlist which I knew was nonsense. She wasn’t, and I was right. This isn’t hard. Nothing fascinating about it except you want to say she was on a list she obviously wasn’t on and clearly wouldn’t be.
 
Quiet Skies is not the Terrorist Watch List, as she claimed, and is explained in that article. No. Did anyone actually accept the bet. If so, they can owe me.

Weasel. I took the bet. Now you are being a weasel. Whatever. If you man up, admit you are wrong, send the $1000 to Tunnels to Tower. They are my go to charity. Let the board decide who's right in this bet.
 
Weasel. I took the bet. Now you are being a weasel. Whatever. If you man up, admit you are wrong, send the $1000 to Tunnels to Tower. They are my go to charity. Let the board decide who's right in this bet.
Read the first post in this thread and my response. It was about the Terrorist Watchlist. I said no way was she on that list and I’m right. The article proves I was right. Why is it so hard to admit when you’re wrong? I’ve never understood that.

I give to various charities. You can send $10000 to an Alzheimer’s charity. My MIL had Alzheimer’s before she died and my FIL had dementia.
 
Just read post #1, #20, and #25. Pretty clear.
I’ve read the exhibit to post 1 which notes flights and tsa noted in posts 24 and 25.

I have to take my daughter shopping now for food for her and her crew’s Friendsgiving so will take the matter under advisement.

Aloha in the meantime I’d encourage you to revisit settlement talks.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
I’ve read the exhibit to post 1 which notes flights and tsa noted in posts 24 and 25.

I have to take my daughter shopping now for food for her and her crew’s Friendsgiving so will take the matter under advisement.

Aloha in the meantime I’d encourage you to revisit settlement talks.
The only thing that matters is whether she was on the Terrorist Watchlist (which is an FBI list) as she claimed and I knew she wasn’t. She wasn’t. The article my friend ribbont posted explains this. Case closed.
 
Read the first post in this thread and my response. It was about the Terrorist Watchlist. I said no way was she on that list and I’m right. The article proves I was right. Why is it so hard to admit when you’re wrong? I’ve never understood that.

I give to various charities. You can send $10000 to an Alzheimer’s charity. My MIL had Alzheimer’s before she died and my FIL had dementia.

You wrote $10,000. You want that or $1,000, which was our bet? I've already given $1,500 to ALZ this year but if you really believe you won and want me to give 10k, no sweat off my back. I just want you to admit you were wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
The only thing that matters is whether she was on the Terrorist Watchlist (which is an FBI list) as she claimed and I knew she wasn’t. She wasn’t. The article my friend ribbont posted explains this. Case closed.
Since they don't publish the FBI no fly list and there's no due process involved with it, how do you know she's not either still on it or was on it before being removed?

JK, sorta.
 
Post 25 states what list is referenced. Quiet skies. You should settle
I clearly referred to the Terrorist Watchlist, which was mentioned repeatedly, including the OP. That is what I talked about and had in mind. It was in my first post. It’s not my problem others don’t know the difference between the lists. Hell, I may have been on Quiet Skies list after three Middle East business trips. I did get extra scrutiny on both ends of a trip to and from Phoenix - and I have TSA PreCheck so I thought it unusual. Nothing to hide or worry about. However, I don’t know I was on it.

It’s clearly easy to get confused about exactly what we’re talking about here at times.
 
Last edited:
I clearly referred to the Terrorist Watchlist, which was mentioned repeatedly, including the OP. That all I talked about. It was in my first post. It’s not my problem others don’t know the difference between the lists. Hell, I may have been on Quiet Skies list after three Middle East business trips. I did get extra scrutiny on both ends of a trip to and from Phoenix - and I have TSA PreCheck so I thought it unusual. Nothing to hide or worry about. However, I don’t know I was on it.

It’s clearly easy to get confused about exactly what we’re talking about here at times.
The op is flights. The ones in the other posts were also flights referenced in the attached articles .
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
You wrote $10,000. You want that or $1,000, which was our bet? I've already given $1,500 to ALZ this year but if you really believe you won and want me to give 10k, no sweat off my back. I just want you to admit you were wrong.
Typo. I trust you and I both give more than that per year. Look, I always had the Terrorist Watchlist in mind because it was in the OP and what I referred to. I’m sure she was never on it.

We can just stand down and move on. Tough loss by the Hoosiers today. Puck Furdue.
 
The op is flights. The ones in the other posts were also flights referenced in the attached articles .
The quote that started it all:

“So Tulsi goes on Fox and criticizes Kamala and goes on Terrorist watch list next day. Who the hell is the dictator?”
 
Frankly, didn’t read it. Terrorist Watchlist is an actual thing. She wasn’t on it.
I ask once again. How do you know she isn't/wasn't on it?

Still just kind of kidding, but that thing has a life of its own. They've admitted that there aren't enough people to keep it clean and well maintained. Add in the fact that there isn't due process in the additions to it or the process to get off it and it's a great example of our executive branch gone bad.
 
I ask once again. How do you know she isn't/wasn't on it?

Still just kind of kidding, but that thing has a life of its own. They've admitted that there aren't enough people to keep it clean and well maintained. Add in the fact that there isn't due process in the additions to it or the process to get off it and it's a great example of our executive branch gone bad.
She meets no criteria to be on the FBI’s Terrorist Watchlist. It’s ridiculous on its face.
 
Domestic terrorist gov watch list. The article was attached. And done so repeatedly. Flights.
Quiet Skies isn’t a terrorist watchlist - domestic or otherwise.

The Terrorist Watchlist included actual terrorists and suspected terrorists.

Why make it so complicated?
 
Quiet Skies isn’t a terrorist watchlist - domestic or otherwise.

The Terrorist Watchlist included actual terrorists and suspected terrorists.

Why make it so complicated?

I don’t think you’re without defenses but the article was linked multiple times and I believe your knee jerk reaction was to deny she was placed on any gov list. The quiet skies program has been the gravamen of this entire thread. My inclination is to rule against you. As I said I’ll take this under advisement so that I can read the thread more closely but if a settlement is to be had I’d pursue it now
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC

I don’t think you’re without defenses but the article was linked multiple times and I believe your knee jerk reaction was to deny she was placed on any gov list. The quiet skies program has been the gravamen of this entire thread. My inclination is to rule against you. As I said I’ll take this under advisement so that I can read the thread more closely but if a settlement is to be had I’d pursue it now
That’s fine, However, my reaction was directly to the words “Terrorist Watch List.” This is a fact.

We’re probably all in government lists of various types, but I doubt any of us are on a terrorist list. Well, not sure about one or two . . . 😉
 
Weasel. I took the bet. Now you are being a weasel. Whatever. If you man up, admit you are wrong, send the $1000 to Tunnels to Tower. They are my go to charity. Let the board decide who's right in this bet.
You knew he wasn't going to pay up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jet812
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT