ADVERTISEMENT

Elon/Twitter/and stories from the sh!tter?

I don't think he knows any better. He really is that dumbfounded. For 3 years the msm went off about Russia collusion, the dossier, and the fisa warrants and now we see emails of the press colluding with the dnc, Clinton campaign, fbi, doj, cia trying to frame a United States citizen and sitting president. And it all gets buried.
Are you pretending? Is this an act?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zizkov and Ohio Guy

I hope every lib employee that doesn’t want free speech for the right is sent directly to the unemployment line.
Is there a list of high profile people that have been banned from Twitter for their tweets?

Follow up question, are you a supporter of people agreeing to rules and abiding by them?

ANother follow up, when people don't follow the rules and are suspended or warned for their activities violating the terms of their agreement, do you support those people continuing to violate their agreement without repercussions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
I try to avoid it. But I'm reading this one, and your responses to Ohio make no sense at all.
Of course it doesn't to you!!!!!!! You only watch your Bullsh!t sources. For the last 8 months anyone and everyone with top secret clearance has already seen the damning evidence and told the public about it. But, it doesn't get reported. Well now Durham got the emails released. The msm along with Hillary, several intelligence agencys, and Big Tech screwed up which is something many of us on the right already knew, but since the msm kept up its agenda you all just kept following along like a bunch of goobers. There have already been several people FIRED in intelligence agencies, which led to the Durham investigation in the first place. Not reported.

 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Where is it buried? How did you find out about it? Are you an internet super sleuth? And are you sure that's all true?
No its all "fake news". Its only been circling for about 6-8 months and lately its heating up because Durham keeps filing stuff. Nobody reports it. If you follow the story you can find things here and there. Lets put it this way. IF this was Trumps guys setting all this up against Hillary OR Biden and using the msm to hide it and keep everyone off the trail while using the FBI DOJ and CIA as weapons, THIS would be the biggest news on the planet. But the msm is directly involved so its not reported. Its sickening. If it was Trump that did this I would want him skewered. ITS HILLARY. The same one who we all were sick of getting away with murder. Why do you think we voted for TRUMP!
 
Last edited:
Of course it doesn't to you!!!!!!! You only watch your Bullsh!t sources. For the last 8 months anyone and everyone with top secret clearance has already seen the damning evidence and told the public about it. But, it doesn't get reported. Well now Durham got the emails released. The msm along with Hillary, several intelligence agencys, and Big Tech screwed up which is something many of us on the right already knew, but since the msm kept up its agenda you all just kept following along like a bunch of goobers. There have already been several people FIRED in intelligence agencies, which led to the Durham investigation in the first place. Not reported.

WTFF are you even talking about?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Zizkov and Ohio Guy
Of course it doesn't to you!!!!!!! You only watch your Bullsh!t sources. For the last 8 months anyone and everyone with top secret clearance has already seen the damning evidence and told the public about it. But, it doesn't get reported. Well now Durham got the emails released. The msm along with Hillary, several intelligence agencys, and Big Tech screwed up which is something many of us on the right already knew, but since the msm kept up its agenda you all just kept following along like a bunch of goobers. There have already been several people FIRED in intelligence agencies, which led to the Durham investigation in the first place. Not reported.

So you basically get your news from a source that allows anyone to publish, regardless of proving that it's factual.

I'll stick with the msm over this garbage.
 
So you basically get your news from a source that allows anyone to publish, regardless of proving that it's factual.

I'll stick with the msm over this garbage.
So I post an article with links of the "ACTUAL" filings, and past reports, and this new filing, and you reply with this BS? You know looking at your posts it doesn't surprise me one bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
So I post an article with links of the "ACTUAL" filings, and past reports, and this new filing, and you reply with this BS? You know looking at your posts it doesn't surprise me one bit.
So this source is also where the woman I saw earlier on TikTok that thinks Joe Biden is dead and there are actually multiple actors wearing Joe Biden masks acting as though they are him, including Jim Carrey and James Woods....is this where she gets her news?
 
So this source is also where the woman I saw earlier on TikTok that thinks Joe Biden is dead and there are actually multiple actors wearing Joe Biden masks acting as though they are him, including Jim Carrey and James Woods....is this where she gets her news?
Can you believe that a news source would actually do this? An msm news source? No way!

 
Can you believe that a news source would actually do this? An msm news source? No way!

I'm not sure what that clip has to do with anything I said or posted. You may not have seen, but I really don't care about Twitter until they start banning #iubb or making changes on how i get my sports news, because that's literally all that I use it for.
 
I give him maybe 90 minutes after his account is freed up.
If nothing else, Trump will continue posting through his surrogates, as he has always done.

My real hope is that we eliminate publishers' immunity for electronic libel, slander, defamation, invasion of privacy, intimidation and conspiracy etc. published by Twitter and other services. "Free speech" never really protected communications in these categories anyway.

If electronic immunity is eliminated so that posters and Twitter are financially liable for their actions, I would have no problem if Musk makes Twitter wide open (even though I don't really believe what he is saying are his true intentions).

And, traditionally, the publishers (i.e. broadcasters and print media in the old days) were just as liable for their republishing of slanderous material (i.e. letters-to-the-editor) as the original defamatory speakers and writers. So, this wouldn't be anything new.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
On a personal level for those twitter employees, I get the uncertainty and uneasiness about Musk taking over. Anyone who's ever had a new boss come in, have your company merge or have major shake up at the leadership level at your job can relate.

It's kind of a dick move to revel in them sincerely wondering if they'll have a job or not.
When a new owner takes over, it is inevitable that many effective, loyal employees get fired, demoted, reassigned, lose pay or are insulted/demeaned into quitting. I am not surprised they are nervous.

But some of these Twitter employees quoted above sound like they thought they were not even working in the real world, like they thought Twitter was something other than just another capitalist simply because it was in the IT world.
 
If nothing else, Trump will continue posting through his surrogates, as he has always done.

My real hope is that we eliminate publishers' immunity for electronic libel, slander, defamation, invasion of privacy, intimidation and conspiracy etc. published by Twitter and other services. "Free speech" never really protected communications in these categories anyway.

If electronic immunity is eliminated so that posters and Twitter are financially liable for their actions, I would have no problem if Musk makes Twitter wide open (even though I don't really believe what he is saying are his true intentions).

And, traditionally, the publishers (i.e. broadcasters and print media in the old days) were just as liable for their republishing of slanderous material (i.e. letters-to-the-editor) as the original defamatory speakers and writers. So, this wouldn't be anything new.
Third party publishers. Not publishers
 
So this source is also where the woman I saw earlier on TikTok that thinks Joe Biden is dead and there are actually multiple actors wearing Joe Biden masks acting as though they are him, including Jim Carrey and James Woods....is this where she gets her news?

Yes.

This is all what we should all be paying attention to, but the "sensible," respectable," "integrity-maintaining" and "not-batshit-crazy" media refuses to cover it. It's all right there in Hillary's emails, which have been forwarded to Hunter's laptop. I'm pretty sure Hunter's laptop was buried with the real Joe Biden, but Jim Carrey and James Woods do such a good job impersonating him no one bothers to look there. Maybe John Durham will.
 
Yes.

This is all what we should all be paying attention to, but the "sensible," respectable," "integrity-maintaining" and "not-batshit-crazy" media refuses to cover it. It's all right there in Hillary's emails, which have been forwarded to Hunter's laptop. I'm pretty sure Hunter's laptop was buried with the real Joe Biden, but Jim Carrey and James Woods do such a good job impersonating him no one bothers to look there. Maybe John Durham will.
Cry more.

 
You’re really bad at this. It’s like you guys really want to refute things with all the far right talking points about twitter, can’t find anyone to reply to but you’re going to reply anyway.

Again, there isn’t any teeth gnashing about Elon Musk buying twitter here.
 
You’re really bad at this. It’s like you guys really want to refute things with all the far right talking points about twitter, can’t find anyone to reply to but you’re going to reply anyway.

Again, there isn’t any teeth gnashing about Elon Musk buying twitter here.
Is that because you truly don’t care about Twitter or don’t believe much is going to change or that any changes will have minimal to no effect on your goings on there?

It looks like you posted an account in this thread so I would think you care about Twitter at least somewhat.

Given that you really, really don’t care about the political implications of the Musk takeover, would you willing to admit to the gaslighting that Gadde, other Twitter employees and many Democrats partook in re: banning exclusively right leaning figures from Twitter?

It would be a nice moment of honesty from guys like you and Goat and might help to heal our partisan divide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Is that because you truly don’t care about Twitter or don’t believe much is going to change or that any changes will have minimal to no effect on your goings on there?

It looks like you posted an account in this thread so I would think you care about Twitter at least somewhat.

Given that you really, really don’t care about the political implications of the Musk takeover, would you willing to admit to the gaslighting that Gadde, other Twitter employees and many Democrats partook in re: banning exclusively right leaning figures from Twitter?

It would be a nice moment of honesty from guys like you and Goat and might help to heal our partisan divide.
Playing into your fantasy and endorsing your incorrect use of the term gaslight is required to heal the partisan divide? No thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
Is that because you truly don’t care about Twitter or don’t believe much is going to change or that any changes will have minimal to no effect on your goings on there?

It looks like you posted an account in this thread so I would think you care about Twitter at least somewhat.

Given that you really, really don’t care about the political implications of the Musk takeover, would you willing to admit to the gaslighting that Gadde, other Twitter employees and many Democrats partook in re: banning exclusively right leaning figures from Twitter?

It would be a nice moment of honesty from guys like you and Goat and might help to heal our partisan divide.
As a lib, I don't care who owns Twitter. I'm sure there are some outrageous and embarrassing posts of outrage, but yeah, I don't care.

That's because I believe him that he's probably going to just let it be basically an unmoderated platform. That's fine. If Twitter turns into a dumpster fire like other unmoderated platforms than so be it.

I'm mainly curious if he's going to start pushing levers and turn it into his personal echo chamber. I don't believe he will but it's his business now so he has that right.

Part of that curiosity is that he hasn't shown much restraint when it comes to personal criticism with his businesses. He's famously banned certain outlets, has very strict NDA (particularly with social media) releases, etc which again, makes me curious on how he's going to handle memes, conspiracy theories and dirty laundry being published on Twitter about him cuz you know he's going to be targeted and pushed as the now defender of free speech.

So I'm curious how that will unfold.

Still, my belief now is it will become like an unmoderated board and turn into an entertaining dumpster fire where the majority of the content will be up to the individual to have to figure out the BS level.....that's probably not a good thing but, not my problem.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC and larsIU
Playing into your fantasy and endorsing your incorrect use of the term gaslight is required to heal the partisan divide? No thanks.
Disproportionately targeting right wing Twitter posters and their beliefs and telling them it’s for apolitical reasons is gaslighting. You don’t have to admit that is what Twitter was doing, that’s fine. But it's what was happening, and why Musk decided to buy the company.
 
Last edited:
As a lib, I don't care who owns Twitter. I'm sure there are some outrageous and embarrassing posts of outrage, but yeah, I don't care.

That's because I believe him that he's probably going to just let it be basically an unmoderated platform. That's fine. If Twitter turns into a dumpster fire like other unmoderated platforms than so be it.

I'm mainly curious if he's going to start pushing levers and turn it into his personal echo chamber. I don't believe he will but it's his business now so he has that right.

Part of that curiosity is that he hasn't shown much restraint when it comes to personal criticism with his businesses. He's famously banned certain outlets, has very strict NDA (particularly with social media) releases, etc which again, makes me curious on how he's going to handle memes, conspiracy theories and dirty laundry being published on Twitter about him cuz you know he's going to be targeted and pushed as the now defender of free speech.

So I'm curious how that will unfold.

Still, my belief now is it will become like an unmoderated board and turn into an entertaining dumpster fire where the majority of the content will be up to the individual to have to figure out the BS level.....that's probably not a good thing but, not my problem.
Be funny if he just flooded the shit out of it with Tesla ads
 
Disproportionately targeting right wing Twitter posters and their beliefs and telling them it’s for apolitical reasons is gaslighting. You don’t have to admit that is what Twitter was doing, that’s fine. But it's what was happening, and why Musk decided to buy the company.
Disproportionately and exclusively are very different adverbs.

Even the milder version, I can't say Twitter was doing, because I don't know that they were.
 
You’re really bad at this. It’s like you guys really want to refute things with all the far right talking points about twitter, can’t find anyone to reply to but you’re going to reply anyway.

Again, there isn’t any teeth gnashing about Elon Musk buying twitter here.


Twitter stepped on their dick in the last POTUS election. They deserve the scorn. Hunter Biden’s behavior and business was and is a completely legitimate political discourse and reporting topic. Particularly how he was so deeply intertwined in internationally sensitive areas.
 
Last edited:
As a lib, I don't care who owns Twitter. I'm sure there are some outrageous and embarrassing posts of outrage, but yeah, I don't care.

That's because I believe him that he's probably going to just let it be basically an unmoderated platform. That's fine. If Twitter turns into a dumpster fire like other unmoderated platforms than so be it.

I'm mainly curious if he's going to start pushing levers and turn it into his personal echo chamber. I don't believe he will but it's his business now so he has that right.

Part of that curiosity is that he hasn't shown much restraint when it comes to personal criticism with his businesses. He's famously banned certain outlets, has very strict NDA (particularly with social media) releases, etc which again, makes me curious on how he's going to handle memes, conspiracy theories and dirty laundry being published on Twitter about him cuz you know he's going to be targeted and pushed as the now defender of free speech.

So I'm curious how that will unfold.

Still, my belief now is it will become like an unmoderated board and turn into an entertaining dumpster fire where the majority of the content will be up to the individual to have to figure out the BS level.....that's probably not a good thing but, not my problem.

So just another water cooler? We beat them to market by years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TommyCracker
Cue Cougar's Crumblin Down.

What's happening here John?

For some reason the truth is coming out from all sides.

That's not supposed to happen we control the narrative.

Elon Musk says hey!

 
I love that Josh Hawley also doesn't know what 'free speech' is.
It's kind of maddening that people who should know better say stuff like that. But without railing against the perceived quashing of free speech, far right conservatives go against a central tenant that gets them elected and what most far right conservatives spend most their time talking about - victimhood.
 
It's kind of maddening that people who should know better say stuff like that. But without railing against the perceived quashing of free speech, far right conservatives go against a central tenant that gets them elected and what most far right conservatives spend most their time talking about - victimhood.
Ohhh Lord the "really really interested" guy is back and brought up elected.

Lets see now...how many conspiracies have turned out to be true lately? How bout all of them. Here's whats coming soon. I know you really really thought 81 million people voted for this sh!t. You're delusional.

 
Ohhh Lord the "really really interested" guy is back and brought up elected.

Lets see now...how many conspiracies have turned out to be true lately? How bout all of them. Here's whats coming soon. I know you really really thought 81 million people voted for this sh!t. You're delusional.

You need help dude. Like, I know you're a religious nut, but that ain't helping you with your mental health. Seek some real help, not that magical fantasy stuff
 
Ohhh Lord the "really really interested" guy is back and brought up elected.

Lets see now...how many conspiracies have turned out to be true lately? How bout all of them. Here's whats coming soon. I know you really really thought 81 million people voted for this sh!t. You're delusional.

You know, if you think about it a different way, to the Dem's this was safely the most secured election win ever. The answer just is not the same "Safe and secure" as the question is being asked.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT