ADVERTISEMENT

Drake Bulldogs

Has McCollum taken any team to an NCAA Tourney?

If he has, what’s his record in that tourney?

Has a McCollum team ever been to an Elite 8?

Has McCollum ever been named conference Coach of the Year, for a major D1 conference?

How many D1 programs did he serve as an assistant for?

They both started their careers at the same time, Arch just had a better track due to many factors - he came from a well-known basketball family, and played for NC State, an ACC basketball school. He then was an assistant at Western Kentucky, NC State, AZ State, Ohio State, and Arizona before he got the Dayton job, where he went 139-63, .688, 4 trips to the tourney in 6 years and an Elite 8.

Ben may be a better coach, but he hasn’t proven that yet and doesn’t have Archie’s pedigree at this point. As I just showed you - it’s not even close
Yes. He's won 4 NCAA tourneys. Just not the one you like to watch. And then he took his D2 kids to a mid major and went 30-3.

You know Archie failed, right? That ought to tell you that being an assistant and having one good run over 8-9 days in a tournament with a program that was good before he got there isn't a signifier of future success.

And if you know that, then why would you require it again from our next coach? No one here is saying we'd take McCollum over Stevens. We aren't getting Stevens, or Donovan, or Pearl or Few.

No one with a quality high major program is going to hop-to because it says Indiana on our jersey. May could've, and didn't. Otz could, but apparently isn't.

Beard is a 911 call away from another for cause firing.

Oh whatever, this argument is stupid. Keep living in fairytale land. I'm going to bed.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GThomas
Mid-major, no P4 experience. Major risk. And if Arch was a major risk, what’s that make McCollum?

This argument is so reminiscent of 8 years ago when we all convinced ourselves that Arch was a grand slam hire. And, that was a guy that had major success in the A10, 4 years straight NCAA tourney appearances with an Elite 8.
Is it possible that, maybe, McCollum and Archie are actually different people? Different type of coaches that run different schemes? Is it possible to fathom that?

Asking for the people that think not all coaches are the same people?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GThomas
Is it possible that, maybe, McCollum and Archie are actually different people? Different type of coaches that run different schemes? Is it possible to fathom that?

Asking for the people that think not all coaches are the same people?
My memory is a bit cloudy, but wasn't Butler considered mid-major not that long ago? Whatever happened to that coach?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iulb
My memory is a bit cloudy, but wasn't Butler considered mid-major not that long ago? Whatever happened to that coach?
Butler is in over their heads in the Big East. They can't complete moneywise. That's the reason Matta's staying on. They can't afford todays coaching salaries.
 
Is it possible that, maybe, McCollum and Archie are actually different people? Different type of coaches that run different schemes? Is it possible to fathom that?

Asking for the people that think not all coaches are the same people?
Sure, but listen to what you asked? Total risk isn’t it? It’s why I bring Arch up, because he wasn’t a risk was he?

I do know one thing though, Drake is #364 this year. You sure that will fly with Indiana fans that want a modern offense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUgradman
A few years, preferably at more than one program.

Crean is a great example of why this is so important. He did a great job of getting IU back to relevance and those were great years, but he couldn’t sustain it. It takes a “big person” to handle a blue-blood level program, beyond x’s & o’s.

Pitino, Pearl, Izzo, fill in the blank. Long-term success at the P4 level.
Izzo was literally a career assistant before he was named head coach to replace Jud Heathcoat. He was hired at MSU after spending zero time as a head coach and 12 seasons on the bench as an assistant. He had never run any college program when he was hired. IU is not getting some big name coach with multiple stops at a P4 level. If they are out there, they are good where they are at.
 
After reading about McCollum, I am convinced he is the best option for us to try at this time. Some people posted concerns about his team's slow pace of play, but when I read the article from The Athletic that was linked here, it sounds like his teams just pass up bad shots for good shots for good shots until they get a great shot. Here is a quote from the article that convinced me he is the one:

"If there’s a singular moment that defines why McCollum has been able to sustain what he’s built and why he’s a smart bet to win at D-1, it happened in the days leading up to his first national title. His opponent in that 2017 championship game was Fairmont State. McCollum watched Fairmont beat Bellarmine 79-68 in the semifinal. He turned to one of his graduate assistant coaches and said, “At least we finished second.”

Fairmont State was a full-court pressing team whose opponents were averaging 17.7 turnovers per game. Its athleticism seemed overwhelming. McCollum didn’t sleep for two nights trying to figure out a plan of attack. Eventually, he widened his lens. Fairmont coach Jerrod Calhoun (now the head coach at Youngstown State), was part of the Bob Huggins tree. So McCollum studied Huggins’ Press Virginia squad, looking for a press breaker that worked against the Mountaineers. He remembered then-Oklahoma State coach Brad Underwood had worked for Huggins as well. And on Feb. 4, 2017, the Cowboys scored 82 points in 63 possessions at West Virginia, the highest efficiency all season against the defense that caused more turnovers than any other in D-1 that year. McCollum copied OSU’s press breakers and taught them to his team the day of the game. Northwest Missouri had only 12 turnovers and won 71-61.

McCollum is constantly going down rabbit holes to try to find anything — book, podcast, EuroLeague offense — that can make his system better."

I remember when we had Coach Knight there was a sense that we could beat anybody because our coach would prepare our team so well. This is the sense I get from Coach McCollum - he will prepare his team to compete with and beat teams with better athletes. That is what we used to have with RMK. I want that again.

For those who would prefer a well-established, proven coach who has already had great success, I have a sincere question: what are the data points where that has happened previously? Roy Williams to UNC? Bill Self from UofI to Kansas? Kelvin Sampson from Oklahoma to IU? These are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head. What other examples are there of great, proven coaches who have left an established, successful program to go to another school? Coaches who meet all of your criteria?
 
After reading about McCollum, I am convinced he is the best option for us to try at this time. Some people posted concerns about his team's slow pace of play, but when I read the article from The Athletic that was linked here, it sounds like his teams just pass up bad shots for good shots for good shots until they get a great shot. Here is a quote from the article that convinced me he is the one:

"If there’s a singular moment that defines why McCollum has been able to sustain what he’s built and why he’s a smart bet to win at D-1, it happened in the days leading up to his first national title. His opponent in that 2017 championship game was Fairmont State. McCollum watched Fairmont beat Bellarmine 79-68 in the semifinal. He turned to one of his graduate assistant coaches and said, “At least we finished second.”

Fairmont State was a full-court pressing team whose opponents were averaging 17.7 turnovers per game. Its athleticism seemed overwhelming. McCollum didn’t sleep for two nights trying to figure out a plan of attack. Eventually, he widened his lens. Fairmont coach Jerrod Calhoun (now the head coach at Youngstown State), was part of the Bob Huggins tree. So McCollum studied Huggins’ Press Virginia squad, looking for a press breaker that worked against the Mountaineers. He remembered then-Oklahoma State coach Brad Underwood had worked for Huggins as well. And on Feb. 4, 2017, the Cowboys scored 82 points in 63 possessions at West Virginia, the highest efficiency all season against the defense that caused more turnovers than any other in D-1 that year. McCollum copied OSU’s press breakers and taught them to his team the day of the game. Northwest Missouri had only 12 turnovers and won 71-61.

McCollum is constantly going down rabbit holes to try to find anything — book, podcast, EuroLeague offense — that can make his system better."

I remember when we had Coach Knight there was a sense that we could beat anybody because our coach would prepare our team so well. This is the sense I get from Coach McCollum - he will prepare his team to compete with and beat teams with better athletes. That is what we used to have with RMK. I want that again.

For those who would prefer a well-established, proven coach who has already had great success, I have a sincere question: what are the data points where that has happened previously? Roy Williams to UNC? Bill Self from UofI to Kansas? Kelvin Sampson from Oklahoma to IU? These are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head. What other examples are there of great, proven coaches who have left an established, successful program to go to another school? Coaches who meet all of your criteria?
When was the last time IU had a cerebral coach?
 
The best head coaches are chameleons: they adapt to their roster and situations, they can beat you with whoever their players are, and they get the most out of their players. They win, period. I can't predict the future. But, if BM is a coaching savant, he can adapt. Maybe BM just hasn't had the opportunity to get behind the wheel of an Indy racecar yet.
 
The best head coaches are chameleons: they adapt to their roster and situations, they can beat you with whoever their players are, and they get the most out of their players. They win, period. I can't predict the future. But, if BM is a coaching savant, he can adapt. Maybe BM just hasn't had the opportunity to get behind the wheel of an Indy racecar yet.
Well said.
 
Have you done any research or just throwing shit against the wall until something sticks?

Did you look at the posts for PPG for McCollum coached teams.

IU North said his teams are fun to watch.
Fun to watch they have the 365th tempo they shoot less threes then Indiana per game
 
Have you done any research or just throwing shit against the wall until something sticks?

Did you look at the posts for PPG for McCollum coached teams.

IU North said his teams are fun to watch.
Don't sweat it, man. Some think BM is Archie 2.0 ... and have put Beard on a coaching pedestal for some reason. Opposing viewpoints. Oh well.
 
Don't sweat it, man. Some think BM is Archie 2.0 ... and have put Beard on a coaching pedestal for some reason. Opposing viewpoints. Oh well.
I have not put beard on a pedestal at all but some have put mccullom on one. If dolson wants to tie himself to an unproven d1 coach so be it but he better win and win right away.
 
I have not put beard on a pedestal at all but some have put mccullom on one. If dolson wants to tie himself to an unproven d1 coach so be it but he better win and win right away.
I wasn't referring to you. If it came off that way, I apologize ... I was referencing the "Beard or bust" people. I'm probably guilty of putting BM on a pedestal, as are some others. Some people do the same with Beard.

I don't think there's malice involved ... some are just so dug in it can get combative, perhaps unintentionally. I'm guilty of that, at times ... but I understand all viewpoints. I understand the pro and con BM arguments, just as I understand the pro and con Beard arguments. If it's Beard, I'll get on board.
 
Don't sweat it, man. Some think BM is Archie 2.0 ... and have put Beard on a coaching pedestal for some reason. Opposing viewpoints. Oh well.
I have not put beard on a pedestal at all but some have put mccullom on one. If dolson wants to tie himself to an unproven d1 coach so be it but he better win and win right away.
I wasn't referring to you. If it came off that way, I apologize ... I was referencing the "Beard or bust" people. I'm probably guilty of putting BM on a pedestal, as are some others. Some people do the same with Beard.

I don't think there's malice involved ... some are just so dug in it can get combative, perhaps unintentionally. I'm guilty of that, at times ... but I understand all viewpoints. I understand the pro and con BM arguments, just as I understand the pro and con Beard arguments. If it's Beard, I'll get on board.
Didn't mean me just if beard is the best we can do I prefer him over a guy with one year of d1 experience. Robbie Hummel seemed very happy with us hiring mccollum which means he thinks he'd be a bust. To big a risk imo.
 
I looked at Div2 coaches that won a national Div2 championship to gauge their later success in Div1. Oops. Out of 50 odd coaches, and some with multiple championships, it looks like Bruce Pearl is the only D1 success story.
 
I looked at Div2 coaches that won a national Div2 championship to gauge their later success in Div1. Oops. Out of 50 odd coaches, and some with multiple championships, it looks like Bruce Pearl is the only D1 success story.
While BM is not my favorite choice, can I mention Bo Ryan’s 4 National Championships in D3 at UW-Platteville?

Pretty much in this order of whom I felt are realistic targets, I’ve wanted TJO, Beard, McCasland, Collins, Brownell.

Finally, Goodman’s a goof. Robbie Hummel needs a better podcast partner.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT