Point being conservatives are much more willing to part with their own money on their own terms to help the less fortunate. Democrats are much more willing to demand others part with their money.
Lol. Show me.
Point being conservatives are much more willing to part with their own money on their own terms to help the less fortunate. Democrats are much more willing to demand others part with their money.
Following scientific data collection and coding procedures, we identify 421 effect sizes from 31 empirical studies. Our meta-analysis results suggest that political conservatives are significantly more charitable than liberals at an overall level,Lol. Show me.
it’s the obsession with not paying taxes.
And Sex reassignment surgery.And have abortions.
As long as white is in the equation, I’m for it.Giving money to grouops to fight for the use of conversion therapy or money to white natiinalist is not charity imo.
Neither of those causes are funded by registered charities numbnuts.Giving money to grouops to fight for the use of conversion therapy or money to white natiinalist is not charity imo.
Neither of those causes are funded by registered charities numbnuts.
It would be much more cost effective to make no charitable donations at all, even with deductions. But of course you know that….. presumably.Did we say anything about registered charities? Oh wait, that’s how you get a tax deduction so I see why that’s so important to them. Haven’t get something in return.
It would be much more cost effective to make no charitable donations at all, even with deductions. But of course you know that….. presumably.
Yes given the study I linked only collects data from donations to registered charities, it is extremely pertinent.
You’re floundering. Admit you were wrong and move along dimwit.Not at all. Most philanthropy does not involve 501(c)s nor is it linked to political parties.
You’re floundering. Admit you were wrong and move along dimwit.
When confronted with data that conservatives are more charitable, you resort to bullshit obfuscating. You're pathetic.I’m not wrong in at all dole. I think even you are smart enough to realize this.
When confronted with data that conservatives are more charitable, you resort to bullshit obfuscating. You're pathetic.
I don’t like your post, but I like your delivery!Just because you are dumb doesn’t mean you can’t be genuine. Have some dignity.
Lack of shelter is not the problem with U.S. homeless. We know this intuitively because the amount of people sleeping on the street in Chicago during the winter falls to about zero while you can’t walk to Walgreens in the summer without stepping over half a dozen vagabonds.
Homeless does not and should not equal sleeping on the street.
And mean and bitter. Yep, no chance to be happy.they’ll become pubs.
And brokenAnd mean and bitter. Yep, no chance to be happy.
Please stop subtweeting me you cowardly kunt.In 20 years I might have seen 5 people sleeping on the streets in Atlanta. You see panhandlers on the exits and street corners now and then. There are a few “camps” that you pretty much have to know where they are to see them. It’s weird that the homeless are a walking hazard on Michigan Ave. I wouldn’t have thought that.
Please stop subtweeting me you cowardly kunt.