Until we pay the assistants enough to stick around the next guy will lose anyone worth keeping.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Until we pay the assistants enough to stick around the next guy will lose anyone worth keeping.
The assistant coach pay wasn't what it needed to be...but it was good enough. His B10 record the last 3 years has been unacceptable. Especially considering how crappy the conference has been behind the top 2-3 teams.Until we pay the assistants enough to stick around the next guy will lose anyone worth keeping.
He's also the guy whose teams looked more prepared before timeouts than after. And whose situational awareness was as bad in year 7 as year 1. We've been bad for 130 years and I loved having a coach who loved the program, but unfortunately a HC he isn't.Yes, he had a chance. He's the one that held onto Hiller too long. He's the one that hired Walt Bell and retained him into this year.
A million dollars would have made Wommack think long and hard.He had 7 years of chances.
DeBoer and Wommack both got head coaching gigs. I highly doubt we could have matched their new salaries.
A million dollars would have made Wommack think long and hard.
You make a good point about that the AD should have vetoed both of these, especially the Bell hire. I don't remember a hire being as universally thought to be a mistake than that one. There was no defense of that, especially at that time.Allen made plenty of chances. He was given a long wrong way, but just made too many bad hires. Hillier, Sheridan (the least bad of the bad), the guy from Georgia, Wilt as DC, Walt Bell (the worst of the terrible hires), Guerreri (the second worst). He also made a couple of great hires Bostad, Deboer, and Rod Carey. The reality is if he had hired Carey instead of Bell, he wins 6 games last year and 6 games this year and has an extension. You just can't miss as many times on coordinators as he did. And in fairness a good AD should have vetoed the Bell and Guerreri hires.
Maybe, but maybe not. A young guy with ambition to become a head coach is going to be driven by more than money. Wommack had a great opportunity placed in front of him at S. Alabama. In the final analysis, the difference in a pay bump as a DC in the Big Ten vs. a head coaching position at another FBS school probably wasn't going to dissuade him from taking the step up.A million dollars would have made Wommack think long and hard.
Maybe not, or it might land him a better gig in a couple more years.Maybe, but maybe not. A young guy with ambition to become a head coach is going to be driven by more than money. Wommack had a great opportunity placed in front of him at S. Alabama. In the final analysis, the difference in a pay bump as a DC in the Big Ten vs. a head coaching position at another FBS school probably wasn't going to dissuade him from taking the step up.
Some hires an AD would have a tough time evaluating. Sheridan for instance. You just wanted to keep a good thing going. You can understand that hire. But Bell was so obviously a bad hire. And at a time that we badly needed a good DC he hired one who ran his last team into the ground. A good AD should have said said "find me somebody with a track record of success." Most of the bad hires had either no experience as Coordinators or track records of failure.You make a good point about that the AD should have vetoed both of these, especially the Bell hire. I don't remember a hire being as universally thought to be a mistake than that one. There was no defense of that, especially at that time.
I also agree that things would look different had Carey been the OC the past couple years. I don't know what Allen missed out on from limited NIL funds.
I do think Allen had plenty of chances. IU will never have the resources of the top 3 Big Ten east teams but it should be competitive with most of the rest of them. PU, NW, MN, Rutgers - none of them have significant resource advantages.
Correct. It wasn't the salary for either of them. It was the title.He had 7 years of chances.
DeBoer and Wommack both got head coaching gigs. I highly doubt we could have matched their new salaries.
He is just 6-6 this year so far.Maybe, but maybe not. A young guy with ambition to become a head coach is going to be driven by more than money. Wommack had a great opportunity placed in front of him at S. Alabama. In the final analysis, the difference in a pay bump as a DC in the Big Ten vs. a head coaching position at another FBS school probably wasn't going to dissuade him from taking the step up.