ADVERTISEMENT

Deranged Jack Smith drops all charges

People get investigated when there is a reason to suspect crimes. They don’t investigate when there is nothing but butthurt Trumpsters who feel aggrieved. Basically sissies.
There are mountains of reasons. Leticia James campaigned on the promise of getting Trump. She had no inside information or any belief that he had done anything wrong. She went through his entire past trying to find a crime and when she couldn't find one she brought the beyond ludicrous civil suit. But let me guess... that's different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
There are mountains of reasons. Leticia James campaigned on the promise of getting Trump. She had no inside information or any belief that he had done anything wrong. She went through his entire past trying to find a crime and when she couldn't find one she brought the beyond ludicrous civil suit. But let me guess... that's different.
I’m talking about the federal cases because that is what you guys were talking about. I’ve always said the New York hush money case was a huge reach and shouldn’t have happened (it was criminal, not civil). The Georgia case was essentially the same as the federal election interference case and not needed and shouldn’t have happened. Both of those look very political. Both federal cases are by the book legitimate. Trump and his friends indicted in those cases are very likely guilty. He’s going to get off. Two systems of justice and all.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
There are mountains of reasons. Leticia James campaigned on the promise of getting Trump. She had no inside information or any belief that he had done anything wrong. She went through his entire past trying to find a crime and when she couldn't find one she brought the beyond ludicrous civil suit. But let me guess... that's different.
Revenge is a reason?

Do you think doing that will advance the common good of the country? Or should Trump not care about that and only do what is in his own individual self-interest? [See what I did there? ;)]
 
I’m talking about the federal cases because that is what you guys were talking about. I’ve always said the New York hush money case was a huge reach and shouldn’t have happened (it was criminal, not civil). The Georgia case was essentially the same as the federal election interference case and not needed and shouldn’t have happened. Both of those look very political. Both federal cases are by the book legitimate. Trump and his friends indicted in those cases are very likely guilty. He’s going to get off. Two systems of justice and all.
The Supreme Court already kicked the Sarbanes Oxley case for the J6 defendants. Why do you continue to insist that the charge is legit for Trump?

The KKK case will meet a similar fate.

In short, Jack Smiths charges in DC are total hogwash. That’s what the DOJ gets when it illegally pulls in an outside activist to play serious attorney.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: twenty02
The Supreme Court already kicked the Sarbanes Oxley case for the J6 defendants. Why do you continue to insist that the charge is legit for Trump?

The KKK case will meet a similar fate.

In short, Jack Smiths charges in DC are total hogwash. That’s what the DOJ gets when it illegally pulls in an outside activist to play serious attorney.
The Supreme Court did not end the sentences or cases for the J6 criminals or Trump. Smith adjusted the case to account for the ruling.

What is the KKK case?

Why do you insist in defending criminal behavior in the J6 criminals and Trump? I seriously don’t understand it.
 
The Supreme Court did not end the sentences or cases for the J6 criminals or Trump. Smith adjusted the case to account for the ruling.

What is the KKK case?

Why do you insist in defending criminal behavior in the J6 criminals and Trump? I seriously don’t understand it.

The KKK case is a fraudulent deprivation of constitutional rights. That statute has never been used, not ever.

I’ve always said the J6 people who broke the law should face charges. I also believe the government must strictly adhere to standards of conduct in any criminal case. Jack Smith comes up short in many respects.
 
Revenge is a reason?

Do you think doing that will advance the common good of the country? Or should Trump not care about that and only do what is in his own individual self-interest? [See what I did there? ;)]

Is this serious? You're trying to debate with a janitor from Goodwill
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT