bet if cuomo had said the opposite, stoll would have ignored it.Wait, you suddenly VALUE Cuomo's opinion? Why is that?
At least the JURISTS thought so 🤣🤣🤣bet if cuomo had said the opposite, stoll would have ignored it.
Case was brought and Trump was found guilty. Apparently the prosecutors had a good case afterall
Yeah - it’s funny how that works. And notice that Maher and Cuomo were talking political strategy, not whether or not he was guilty - which he 100% was.Wait, you suddenly VALUE Cuomo's opinion? Why is that?
How do you know he was 100% guilty? When and how did he direct the accountant to post the expense to Legal? If he directed the accountant to post to Legal why wasn’t he called?Yeah - it’s funny how that works. And notice that Maher and Cuomo were talking political strategy, not whether or not he was guilty - which he 100% was.
Jury said so. You know the people that actually heard all of the evidence and not internet warriors that are just pissed that their cult leader was convicted.How do you know he was 100% guilty?
There's this thing called a grand jury, this thing called a trial, this thing called a jury, and this thing called a unanimous verdict of "beyond a reasonable doubt" by that jury of peers.How do you know he was 100% guilty?
Grand Jury is a joke. Jury of his Peers is a joke.There's this thing called a grand jury, this thing called a trial, this thing called a jury, and this thing called a unanimous verdict of "beyond a reasonable doubt" by that jury of peers.
It's a system that serves us well, though I guess you'd prefer dictatorship.
Grand Jury is a joke. Jury of his Peers is a joke.
Didn’t happen.unanimous verdict of "beyond a reasonable doubt"
“If his name was not Donald Trump and if he wasn’t running for president … I’m the former AG of in New York, [and] I’m telling you that case would’ve never been brought.”Yeah - it’s funny how that works. And notice that Maher and Cuomo were talking political strategy, not whether or not he was guilty - which he 100% was.
What crime did he commit?Yeah - it’s funny how that works. And notice that Maher and Cuomo were talking political strategy, not whether or not he was guilty - which he 100% was.
The jury didn’t hear all the evidence.actually heard all of the evidence
The JURISTS?Jury said so. You know the people that actually heard all of the evidence and not internet warriors that are just pissed that their cult leader was convicted.
Are you not paying attention?
I am sorry but I don’t think Trump was down in the basement with the accountants telling them where to post expenses. With my mom and pop businesses, the owners aren’t sitting with the bookkeepers telling them where to post expenses in Quickbooks.“If his name was not Donald Trump and if he wasn’t running for president … I’m the former AG of in New York, [and] I’m telling you that case would’ve never been brought.”
“That’s what is offensive to people, and it should be because if there’s anything left, it’s belief in the justice system,” he added.
He was talking about faith in the justice system. Sure, Trump was “guilty”, but as far as I know, there has NEVER been a case brought like this before. They got very “creative” in elevating these charges to felonies.
Thats what he’s referring to when he talks about faith in the justice system.
Google or search this forum. It has been explained over and over.What crime did he commit?
I am sorry but I don’t think Trump was down in the basement with the accountants telling them where to post expenses. With my mom and pop businesses, the owners aren’t sitting with the bookkeepers telling them where to post expenses in Quickbooks.
Why don’t you explain in your own words. No links just your words.Google or search this forum. It has been explained over and over.
Are NDAs legal deductions?You don't think Trump knew anything about how his company was being run or how his misdeeds were being covered up. Yet you think he can run a country? LMAO
Paying off a prostitute to shut her up to help your election chances is not a legal expense.Are NDAs legal deductions?
You are cringe-level stupid.Wait, you suddenly VALUE Cuomo's opinion? Why is that?
What? Bernie who?You are cringe-level stupid.
The 'fact in the matter' is not any opinion, it is fact.
Cuomo accurately pointed out that President DJT was trailing Bernie in fundraising until the lawfare in NewYork became a money machine.
For that factual reason, Cuomo's opinion was that the case should not have been brought.
Not a crime even if your primary reason for doing so was to help with the election.Paying off a prostitute to shut her up to help your election chances is not a legal expense.
Maybe they should investigate you if you are this clueless on the subject.
Yes it is. Being ignorant of the crime doesn't make it not a crime.Not a crime even if your primary reason for doing so was to help with the election.
Was Trump’s NDA regarding sexual harassment or abuse?Paying off a prostitute to shut her up to help your election chances is not a legal expense.
Maybe they should investigate you if you are this clueless on the subject.
If you say I am in a cult it’s a lie. Do it again and I will ban you.Apparently stoll is abusing his mod powers again. Shocking
And saying it is a cult is not a lie. It fits the definition.
If you say I am in a cult it’s a lie. Do it again and I will ban you.
Then a court of appeals will over turn. It's how our system works.Grand Jury is a joke. Jury of his Peers is a joke.
'Weekend at ________'s'.What? Bernie who?
Say it one more time and you’re gone. You’re not going to come on here and say members are in a cult.Anyone who sits here defending trump 24/7 is in something that fits that description. so what synonym would you like me to use instead?
I didn't say it in that post. I asked what synonym i should use instead so i don't offend dictator mod.Say it one more time and you’re gone. You’re not going to come on here and say members are in a cult.
He seemed pretty important when he was being discussed as a Presidential candidate.Cuomo give this interview from jail?
This guy's opinion and $5 won't get you a small mocha cookie crumble.
I was banned two times for using the correct name of a failed candidate. About a month I think in total.Say it one more time and you’re gone. You’re not going to come on here and say members are in a cult.
Agree and from here on out I plan on it.I was banned two times for using the correct name of a failed candidate. About a month I think in total.
No explanation, nothing.
You don't need any justification at all to do what you feel necessary.
That's a lie. You were given multiple warnings and a detailed explanation.I was banned two times for using the correct name of a failed candidate. About a month I think in total.
No explanation, nothing.
You don't need any justification at all to do what you feel necessary.
Was that before or after he covered up all the nursing home deaths for political reasons? I think at that point, the sexual harassment was well underway, too, but hadn't been made public yet.He seemed pretty important when he was being discussed as a Presidential candidate.