Also, one very interesting finding was the report was unsure who is correct @mcmurtry66 or @Baller23Boogie.
Covid Report
- Thread starter snarlcakes
- Start date
Also, one very interesting finding was the report was unsure who is correct @mcmurtry66 or @Baller23Boogie.
I don't know about all that. Distance did not help, 6 feet wasn't close to enough. But masks, several studies suggest they help. Here is one:
as.cornell.edu
Masks protect better than distancing, study finds
New research shows the maximum risks of being infected by the coronavirus for different scenarios with and without masks.
as.cornell.edu
The dems locking down all the young people when it was not needed actually ended up blowing up in their faces when it came to the 2024 election. They did not forget what was done to them.
Yeah, I definitely remember my kids school making both my kids miss school because one had a fever, which I understand. What I still don't understand is why the kid who was cleared of covid with a doc note got to go back to school just because she had a doc note and the kid that showed absolutely no sign of being sick was home 4 days longer because she didn't have a note saying she was good.
That's not a dem that made that decision.
100% accurate. Science should rule. Which is also why RFK shouldn’t be anywhere near public policy
How conveniently that seems to be forgotten
Since you posted this I’m going to assume this is false but if actually true the parents should be tarred and feathered. But once again since 99% of your posts are lies and nonsense I doubt the validity
Because there was no limiting principle to leftist Covid insanity. This is the logical conclusion.
Evil individuals spent three years telling people they could design a society that offered a life of zero risk. And that zero risk was worth every sacrifice governments asked of you.
In hindsight they were utterly and completely wrong.
Then one day Putin invaded Ukraine and there was no covid anymore.
I just assumed they were from CA or NY. My bad. You damn well know there are Dems here who have done something similar.
How do you know distance didn't help if 6 feet wasn't close enough? How far is far enough?I don't know about all that. Distance did not help, 6 feet wasn't close to enough. But masks, several studies suggest they help. Here is one:
Masks protect better than distancing, study finds
New research shows the maximum risks of being infected by the coronavirus for different scenarios with and without masks.
My foot hasn't looked quite right since I took the jab:
You continue to embarrass yourself daily, but yet you lack any self awareness.
It’s true but heartrending and not here. Kids were sleeping in cribs. Dolls defaced. Kids wearing three masks. Covid was part of a much broader part of psychosis. Just absolutely heartrending.
You know, if you are trying to convince people that you don't have a foot fetish, this is not helping.My foot hasn't looked quite right since I took the jab:
Reality rules. Science should be a human endeavor trying to figure that out.
Scientific method should rule decisions regarding scientific questions. Not that difficult.
True, but bias must be recognized as well. Improperly applied science has yielded incorrect conclusions many times, so let’s not pretend it’s infallible. The problem with science is scientists, folks like Shooter that have an agenda & tailor results to fit it….
I'm wondering if the son of a bitch has any responsibility for the flat lies he posted on here.
No one who understands the scientific method believes it's infallible. It provides a method to get as close to the "truth" as is possible at the time, and is refined and revised as time marches on. Newton was "wrong", per Einstein, and Einstein was "wrong", per quantum mechanics.
Exactly. Which is why the shouting down of any dissent during covid was so deplorable.
"Shouting down dissent" has nothing to do with it. Those who doubted the consensus view at the time (not in hindsight) were unable or unwilling to use the scientific method to refine, revise or supplant that view. They were the ones doing the "shouting".
Your foot fetish is really getting out of hand!My foot hasn't looked quite right since I took the jab:
No, there were many looking at the data in real time, suggesting that only the infirm & elderly were at risk. There was no evidence to suggest minors needed vaccines, or shouldn’t be allowed in hotels, etc without vaccination cards, yet that’s what we had.
This isn't remotely correct. I posted a video about what our current NIH director, Jay Bhattacharya, went through for authoring and supporting the Great Barrington Declaration. You should watch it.
He was attacked for not "following the science." It was horseshit.
The people attacking Bhattacharya were doing the conflating.
I must really get under your skin. It’s tough having an educated MD outsmart you isn’t it?
No. It shouldn't rule decision making. It should do what it does and provide needed information.
You seem to have a need for constant validation for your big brain. Actual smart people don't go around talking about how smart they are.
Correct. And then conspiracy theorist imbeciles should ignore scientific studies and do whatever Qanon tells them to do
