Can you answer the question? Do you pay for sex with hookers?
I've answered it 5 times already, Obsessed Stalker.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you answer the question? Do you pay for sex with hookers?
And I deleted all those posts for you, so your whining rings a little hollow.(rolleyes)
Your BFF is chasing me around the entire board crying, "You're a loser who has sex with hookers and they laugh at you."
Really? So you do pay for sex and you think that the hookers love you. Thanks for clearing it up.I've answered it 5 times already, Obsessed Stalker.
You most definitely can be a Knight fan and detest Trump. I think anyone here can attest to the fact that I am both of those.Well, first of all, he lies on here non-stop.
Second, IIRC, he was a raging Bobby Knight worshiper....and Knight LOVES Trump. You can't really be a yuge Knight fan and not like Trump too as both are flaming narcissists.
Third, he acts exactly like Trump. Throws out constant personal attacks then cries like a little school girl when given back to him. His ego is just as massive.
So, yes, his idol.
Damn. I wondered who beat me to that one.
I bet he has to pay double their normal rate.Can you answer the question? Do you pay for sex with hookers?
And I deleted all those posts for you, so your whining rings a little hollow.
Really? So you do pay for sex and you think that the hookers love you. Thanks for clearing it up.
This is the greatest thread I've ever witnessed on the Water Cooler.Really? So you do pay for sex and you think that the hookers love you. Thanks for clearing it up.
I'm not inclined to be concerned for you when you respond to good faith posting with personal attacks.Did you PM him a warning to stop like you've done with me more than once?
Of course not.....because he keeps doing it.
I'm done with him. He's not a challenge.I'm not inclined to be concerned for you when you respond to good faith posting with personal attacks.
It's time to rein things back in. Put each other on ignore if you can't stay civil.
socialism
I'm done with him. He's not a challenge.
I loved Trump's comments about Venezuela and socialism....
...and, what's more, I love the tepid response they drew.
I don't know that the man truly believes that (I certainly hope he does). And I strongly doubt he wrote the words. But I'm damn glad he said them.
That naughty word. It always gives you that thrill up your leg Time to bomb!
So to quote the South Park underwear gnomes, the steps to follow are now:I loved Trump's comments about Venezuela and socialism....
...and, what's more, I love the tepid response they drew.
I don't know that the man truly believes that (I certainly hope he does). And I strongly doubt he wrote the words. But I'm damn glad he said them.
No. Venezuela should (but, alas, won't) be looked upon as yet another object lesson for why socialism is such a bad and destructive force.
What's so tragically ironic about it is that it's always sold on the premise of actually helping the poor. The people there are having to eat their pets, for chrissakes. And it's among the most resource-rich nations on the planet.
I thought he was the Peace President and Hillary was the War-Monger.....
Your conclusion from trump's comments on Venezuela was "socialism led to the downfall of Venezuela?" Do I have that right?
My conclusion was that he gave socialism the condemnation it deserves in the place it perhaps most needs to be said.
Reagan couldn't have put it any better -- I particularly enjoyed his pointing out that its failure wasn't the result of doing socialism wrong, but of doing it right.
And how about calling Kim rocket man? So presidential, as usual. His advisors asked him not to, but of course, he thinks he is so clever with his nicknames. Our national embarrassment.I loved Trump's comments about Venezuela and socialism....
...and, what's more, I love the tepid response they drew.
I don't know that the man truly believes that (I certainly hope he does). And I strongly doubt he wrote the words. But I'm damn glad he said them.
And how about calling Kim rocket man? So presidential, as usual. His advisors asked him not to, but of course, he thinks he is so clever with his nicknames. Our national embarrassment.
I didn't watch the speech, so I'm just taking for granted your comments about it. To which I respond: to what end?My conclusion was that he gave socialism the condemnation it deserves in the place it perhaps most needs to be said.
Reagan couldn't have put it any better -- I particularly enjoyed his pointing out that its failure wasn't the result of doing socialism wrong, but of doing it right.
No. Venezuela should (but, alas, won't) be looked upon as yet another object lesson for why socialism is such a bad and destructive force.
LOL. How exactly is Venezuela "socialist"????
Un-checked capitalism is just as bad.
The rich have never been richer and if those "evil liberals" had done nothing, they'd have even more money....and STILL think they need more.
And our country would be even more polluted and even more workers hurt/killed from unsafe conditions because regulations "cost jobs."
Oh, I agree. That's why I've never advocated unchecked capitalism -- but, rather, the checked variety.
Why pick on socialism? Venezuela was poor and miserable even before socialism took over. For every miserable socialist county, one can easily counter with equally miserable capitalist counterparts.No. Venezuela should (but, alas, won't) be looked upon as yet another object lesson for why socialism is such a bad and destructive force.
What's so tragically ironic about it is that it's always sold on the premise of actually helping the poor. The people there are having to eat their pets, for chrissakes. And it's among the most resource-rich nations on the planet.
Yet the two things we hear more than anything from Righties (besides immigrants and gays are bad) is a) more tax cuts for the super rich b) get rid of all regulations because it's "costing us jobs"
I mean, Trump just made it legal to kill bears while they are hibernating.
Reducing regulations -- particularly bad ones -- is hardly the same thing as eliminating regulation in toto.
.
LOL. Yathink???And I strongly doubt he wrote the words.
Righties, especially Trump, have gone WAY overboard rolling back regulations.
Heck, right before the hurricanes hit, he canned a regulation to protect people from hurricanes.
And the reason the damage from them is SO bad is because Righties said, "Screw regulations. Build wherever you want to. Who gives a crap if it's in a major flood zone and you don't put in protections? If it gets flooded out, the Feds will pay for it."
You're kidding yourself if you don't think these guys would get rid of virtually every single regulation out there if they could.
Heck, I've had debates with "Libertarians" who openly bragged there should be zero regulations and let "the market" take care of anything bad that happened.
I'm not kidding myself. Nobody I've ever discussed these matters with is in favor of zero regulations or zero taxes -- which is what unfettered capitalism would entail. And I've discussed it with gobs of libertarians.
That's a howling non sequitur.
That just shows how capable capitalist he is. I wish I could do that!As far as taxes, Trump hasn't paid taxes in about 20 years because of special write-offs he and his rich buddies get.
Why pick on socialism? Venezuela was poor and miserable even before socialism took over. For every miserable socialist county, one can easily counter with equally miserable capitalist counterparts.