Senator Lujan. I have a series of yes no questions. Beyond fcking stupid. Let him answer. Let’s hear. Not yes no gotcha!!!
Last edited:
There should be a better way. I have no doubts that Harris nominees would be receiving the same treatment from GOP senators had Harris won.Senator Lujan. I have a series of yes no questions. Beyond fcking stupid. Let him answers. Let’s hear. Not yes no gotcha!!!
For sure it’s bipartisan. Did you say. Wait sir!!! Did you say. IT’S A YES OR NO QUESTION!!!! Yes or no???There should be a better way. I have no doubts that Harris nominees would be receiving the same treatment from GOP senators had Harris won.
She’s married to both Larry David and RFK, Jr?For sure it’s bipartisan. Did you say. Wait sir!!! Did you say. IT’S A YES OR NO QUESTION!!!! Yes or no???
So dumb. Our record reflects that you stated Lyme disease is …. Can you explain to the panel why you said that and what support you have for that statement?
Seeing Larry David’s wife behind him is throwing me off
Warren is the worst. Heard some of her crap driving to and from the hardware store.Warnock what a dumb dickhead. I only want yes or no.
You’re asking questions that aren’t a yes or no answer. I
She’s made over $5M from big pharma. She’s a fraud.Warren is the worst. Heard some of her crap driving to and from the hardware store.
Chick behind her is a knockoutShe’s married to both Larry David and RFK, Jr?
Depends on the nominee. Rubio’s hearing wasn’t contentious. Only the controversial nominees get this level of contention. Hegseth, Kennedy, Gabbard and Patel had or will have contentious hearings.There should be a better way. I have no doubts that Harris nominees would be receiving the same treatment from GOP senators had Harris won.
at least there's no "thank you for the question senator" nonsenseSenator Lujan. I have a series of yes no questions. Beyond fcking stupid. Let him answer. Let’s hear. Not yes no gotcha!!!
Depends on the nominee. Rubio’s hearing wasn’t contentious. Only the controversial nominees get this level of contention. Hegseth, Kennedy, Gabbard and Patel had or will have contentious hearings.
What about Pothole Pete, Richard Levine, Myorkas, Austin, etc? None of these people were remotely qualified yet were all confirmed easily and I don’t remember any contentious hearings.Depends on the nominee. Rubio’s hearing wasn’t contentious. Only the controversial nominees get this level of contention. Hegseth, Kennedy, Gabbard and Patel had or will have contentious hearings.
You’re not even watching hearings for your MAGA buddies so there’s no way you watched any of those.What about Pothole Pete, Richard Levine, Myorkas, Austin, etc? None of these people were remotely qualified yet were all confirmed easily and I don’t remember any contentious hearings.
Warnock what a dumb dickhead. I only want yes or no.
You’re asking questions that aren’t a yes or no answer. I
@Joe_Hoopsier put warnock on our team. Send guest invitation to Auburn. Thx.
Warnock what a dumb dickhead. I only want yes or no.
You’re asking questions that aren’t a yes or no answer. I
Some are better than othersIsn't that a staple in every lawyer movie/tv show?