ADVERTISEMENT

Confirmation hearings are pathetic

Senator Lujan. I have a series of yes no questions. Beyond fcking stupid. Let him answers. Let’s hear. Not yes no gotcha!!!
There should be a better way. I have no doubts that Harris nominees would be receiving the same treatment from GOP senators had Harris won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BradStevens
There should be a better way. I have no doubts that Harris nominees would be receiving the same treatment from GOP senators had Harris won.
For sure it’s bipartisan. Did you say. Wait sir!!! Did you say. IT’S A YES OR NO QUESTION!!!! Yes or no???

So dumb. Our record reflects that you stated Lyme disease is …. Can you explain to the panel why you said that and what support you have for that statement?

Seeing Larry David’s wife behind him is throwing me off
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Univee2 and dr.jb
For sure it’s bipartisan. Did you say. Wait sir!!! Did you say. IT’S A YES OR NO QUESTION!!!! Yes or no???

So dumb. Our record reflects that you stated Lyme disease is …. Can you explain to the panel why you said that and what support you have for that statement?

Seeing Larry David’s wife behind him is throwing me off
She’s married to both Larry David and RFK, Jr?
 
There should be a better way. I have no doubts that Harris nominees would be receiving the same treatment from GOP senators had Harris won.
Depends on the nominee. Rubio’s hearing wasn’t contentious. Only the controversial nominees get this level of contention. Hegseth, Kennedy, Gabbard and Patel had or will have contentious hearings.
 
Depends on the nominee. Rubio’s hearing wasn’t contentious. Only the controversial nominees get this level of contention. Hegseth, Kennedy, Gabbard and Patel had or will have contentious hearings.

Patel will take those idiots apart... That's the next one I'm spending time listening to... Gabbard probably won't get the vote, nor should she... (I think we can do better at that position).

I'm happily willing to lose on Kennedy and Gabbert to get the rest of them through and working for the USA asap...
 
Depends on the nominee. Rubio’s hearing wasn’t contentious. Only the controversial nominees get this level of contention. Hegseth, Kennedy, Gabbard and Patel had or will have contentious hearings.
What about Pothole Pete, Richard Levine, Myorkas, Austin, etc? None of these people were remotely qualified yet were all confirmed easily and I don’t remember any contentious hearings.
 
What about Pothole Pete, Richard Levine, Myorkas, Austin, etc? None of these people were remotely qualified yet were all confirmed easily and I don’t remember any contentious hearings.
You’re not even watching hearings for your MAGA buddies so there’s no way you watched any of those.
 
Isn't that a staple in every lawyer movie/tv show?
Some are better than others

cf48.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT