I get it. The hope harkens back again to the article I keep referencing. That Musk shining a big light will influence congress to be more discerning to assuage bitching from their own constituentsBut it is Congress that makes the decision. If Congress votes to over fund the military, it is over funded. There is no,"but a businessman would not spend but 75%" clause in the Constitution. We went DEEP in debt during the Revolution. Do you recall Washington surrendering to save money? A businessman may well have told Japan if they paid damages we would call it square. If money is your only objective building that military, the most powerful in world history, was a waste no business man would accept
Or look at our military strategy, since WW2 it has been "steel, not blood". We invest heavily to guarantee casualties are lower. Fire superiority and airpower rule American strategy. But it is far cheaper to take the Russian route, let the privates die en masse.
We aren't a business. But the next time a hurricane hits Florida, let's tell them it isn't profitable to send aid. And to point it out, St Louis will be destroyed when New Madrid let's go. Sorry, I don't see how I can recoup my taxes by sending you aid. But best wishes.
As for the hurricane that’s part of what we do or don’t prioritize. But we can’t subsidize everything. That UPenn article says 20 years. We have to start making painful decisions. Twenty noted how we can raise more revenue. That’s easier to do, an easier sell I think, with concurrent cuts