Two things on that
First, I agree with all of that. Memory is clearly a tricky thing. I'd just add that storytellers are particularly prone to this as well as convenient embellishment for the sheer sake of storytelling. Whether it's entirely willful is almost besides the point. That just goes with the territory. When BW goes on the Tonight Show, etc., he's in entertaining storyteller mode. NBC benefitted from his stretching of the anchor role to one of entertainer. It's easy for me to draw the distinction, but I understand how others think it undermines his credibility.
Also, at least by job description, he's not just news reader. As managing editor, I think he has influence or control over which stories go on air. That likely includes some content controls as well.
If they really wanted him back, I think they could have done things far differently without undermining his credibility or the network news need for accuracy. They've clearly chosen a different path, though.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
First, I agree with all of that. Memory is clearly a tricky thing. I'd just add that storytellers are particularly prone to this as well as convenient embellishment for the sheer sake of storytelling. Whether it's entirely willful is almost besides the point. That just goes with the territory. When BW goes on the Tonight Show, etc., he's in entertaining storyteller mode. NBC benefitted from his stretching of the anchor role to one of entertainer. It's easy for me to draw the distinction, but I understand how others think it undermines his credibility.
Also, at least by job description, he's not just news reader. As managing editor, I think he has influence or control over which stories go on air. That likely includes some content controls as well.
If they really wanted him back, I think they could have done things far differently without undermining his credibility or the network news need for accuracy. They've clearly chosen a different path, though.
Posted from Rivals Mobile