Like TB I am no fan of EO's, especially when used to circumvent and take decisions out of the hands of our elected representatives, but I don't agree with TB's call to limit the EO to such a degree. The number on a annual basis never eclipsed 50 per prior to Teddy Roosevelt. They mushroomed to hundreds per year for the next half century (albeit coinciding with two world wars, the stock market crash, the great depression etc), but didn't drop below 50 per year until the Reagan administration and have stayed under that number since. Now, how we interpret the 14th in relation to our current issues with birth tourism and anchor babies is anybody's guess.
On a side note, is using babies for anchors the best use for babies? Or when considering their natural buoyancy, the best choice for an anchor? Also, wouldn't hiring babies as anchors already be covered under our myriad child labor laws? TIA for you consideration
On a side note, is using babies for anchors the best use for babies? Or when considering their natural buoyancy, the best choice for an anchor? Also, wouldn't hiring babies as anchors already be covered under our myriad child labor laws? TIA for you consideration
![coffee-gif.gif](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.ibb.co%2FeUJAfq%2Fcoffee-gif.gif&hash=dba54535a5f9eeca4fe1004901d2bb66)