If thats what you call himNobody is coming because we have a coach for next season. End of story.
So your saying Mike Woodson is a better coach then Jamie Dixon.He's lost 12 games or more 10 seasons in a row. You'd be demanding to fire him after year 2.
If thats what you call him
You don't see Woodson's warts clearly. Quit lying. But yes, the names being floated are likely remote possibilities at best.All 3 have signed contract extensions rather than take jobs at Ohio State, Louisville or Michigan.
So when we move on from Woody, whenever that is, some of you are going to be very disappointed with who is actually interested in the job/who we get.
And this isn’t a ‘we should keep Woodson’ post because I wasn’t a fan of the hire to begin with and I see the warts clearly.
No, I'm saying you don't know what you're talking about, because you're proposing we hire a guy that can't even meet your standards. You are a bleating goat, mad because IU won't poison itself to make you happy.So your saying Mike Woodson is a better coach then Jamie Dixon.
Well, if he’s on ONE LIST from some guy no one has ever heard of, then chalk it up!
Mike Woodson doesn't meet my standards. He can't recruit Jamie Dixion would be ten time better at Indiana Then Woodson.No, I'm saying you don't know what you're talking about, because you're proposing we hire a guy that can't even meet your standards. You are a bleating goat, mad because IU won't poison itself to make you happy.
Thanks for making yourself clear. Everyone was wondering when you'd finally take a side.Mike Woodson doesn't meet my standards. He can't recruit Jamie Dixion would be ten time better at Indiana Then Woodson.
UCLA wanted him but you know he isn't a good coach.
Report: Jamie Dixon Out as UCLA HC Candidate Because of Conflict over TCU Buyout
Jamie Dixon is not expected to be hired as the UCLA head coach despite a report earlier in the week that the Bruins had chosen the TCU Horned Frogs coach to fill their vacancy, according to Ben Bolch of the Los Angeles Times ...www.google.com
I’d take Dixon over Woodson 100 times out of 100, BUT HE’S NOT COMING HERE.Mike Woodson doesn't meet my standards. He can't recruit Jamie Dixion would be ten time better at Indiana Then Woodson.
UCLA wanted him but you know he isn't a good coach.
Report: Jamie Dixon Out as UCLA HC Candidate Because of Conflict over TCU Buyout
Jamie Dixon is not expected to be hired as the UCLA head coach despite a report earlier in the week that the Bruins had chosen the TCU Horned Frogs coach to fill their vacancy, according to Ben Bolch of the Los Angeles Times ...www.google.com
Jamie Dixon wouldn't last 2 years here. You know, toxic fans and all. Crean 2.0.I’d take Dixon over Woodson 100 times out of 100, BUT HE’S NOT COMING HERE.
Who did we play to get those 19 wins?..you know who else had 19 wins..MSU. The MSU we beat and is a 9 seed. Straw man argument and NET told the real storyThanks for making yourself clear. Everyone was wondering when you'd finally take a side.
How does one coach become "ten times better" than another? Woodson is winning, what 19 games a year? Would "Dixion" win 190 games a year? Dang, that would be awesome.
UCLA was universally ridiculed for their amateurish search, where Dixon was among several coaches who turned them down publicly. I'm sure you'd love it if IU looked just as stupid.
We sucked but the NET sucked more. Last year the NET loved Purdue and they got beat by a 300 ranked team.Who did we play to get those 19 wins?..you know who else had 19 wins..MSU. The MSU we beat and is a 9 seed. Straw man argument and NET told the real story
I didn't say 19 wins was impressive. I just asked how we determine one coach is ten times better...because that is an objectively stupid and unprovable claim. If it was 12, the point would be the same.Who did we play to get those 19 wins?..you know who else had 19 wins..MSU. The MSU we beat and is a 9 seed. Straw man argument and NET told the real story
Jamie Dixon wouldn't last 2 years here. You know, toxic fans and all. Crean 2.0.
Indiana has so many resources that Dixon would be great. Not saying he is coming butThanks for making yourself clear. Everyone was wondering when you'd finally take a side.
How does one coach become "ten times better" than another? Woodson is winning, what 19 games a year? Would "Dixion" win 190 games a year? Dang, that would be awesome.
UCLA was universally ridiculed for their amateurish search, where Dixon was among several coaches who turned them down publicly. I'm sure you'd love it if IU looked just as stupid.
Thanks for making yourself clear. Everyone was wondering when you'd finally take a side.
How does one coach become "ten times better" than another? Woodson is winning, what 19 games a year? Would "Dixion" win 190 games a year? Dang, that would be awesome.
UCLA was universally ridiculed for their amateurish search, where Dixon was among several coaches who turned them down publicly. I'm sure you'd love it if IU looked just as stupid.
Elite? Give me a break.
Dixon is way better then Crean. He was elite at Pitt he decided to go back to his Alma matter. With Indiana resources he would be elite not saying is coming but the guy can coach. Before he got there TCU was 50-89 under Trent Johnson. Billy Tubbs was the last coach before Dixon to take TCU to the tournament in 1997. To be honest Dixon is doing what Collins is doing at Northwestern.
TCU Horned Frogs men's basketball - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
He damn near got ran out at PITT. Hes a good coach but he’s not a fit. Not many are. My fear is the fans have too big of expectations. We aren’t that special. We show up. That’s about it.Elite? Give me a break.
Dixon is a good coach, unlike Crean.Jamie Dixon wouldn't last 2 years here. You know, toxic fans and all. Crean 2.0.
He was at Pitt won over 70 percent in the big east do you realize how bad a program TCU was? They are the Northwestern of the south.Elite? Give me a break.