It‘s a President’s conference though, with massive academic and research ties and traditions. And IU has never had much leverage in any form or fashion.I would never say never. The landscape is changing dramatically. IU has very little leverage.
It‘s a President’s conference though, with massive academic and research ties and traditions. And IU has never had much leverage in any form or fashion.I would never say never. The landscape is changing dramatically. IU has very little leverage.
We do have players that will be difference making in games - look at the power and speed Shivers has, DJ Matthews [if he is healthy], Lucas is very fast and good so he may play this year, we brought in very good WRs Camper etc , Lucas has shown he is fast and shifty, Barner has speed for a TE and very good hands. Shiver has experience against SEC defenses and ran over Alabama's defensive players.We have two new coordinators, four new coaches, and tons of new faces in our two deeps on both sides of the ball. Offensively, we’ve torn it down to the studs for the most part and rebuilt it with talent that’s probably decent but not difference making. You’re right, one quarter might not be enough. On the other hand and very much in hindsight, it only took five minutes last Fall in the first game against Iowa to see that we weren’t nearly the team Coach Allen, the players and many fans thought we were going to be, either.
Hope you’re right, but none of those players have shown difference making ability. Maybe the fresh start will do Shivers some good, but he averaged one carry a game for AU last year, and he’s small. Hope he gets 10-15 touches a game.We do have players that will be difference making in games - look at the power and speed Shivers has, DJ Matthews [if he is healthy], Lucas is very fast and good so he may play this year, we brought in very good WRs Camper etc , Lucas has shown he is fast and shifty, Barner has speed for a TE and very good hands. Shiver has experience against SEC defenses and ran over Alabama's defensive players.
I agree.
Time to get out of the Big Ten and join the AAC. It is more of a fit for a smaller program like IU.
Let's judge the team by how long it takes the announcer to yell,IN ONE QUARTER!!!
We might have two possessions in that quarter.
Everyone always talks about the biggest improvement in a season being between games 1 and 2.
ONE FRICKING QUARTER!!!!
No wonder we have the dumbest fan base in the B1G when it comes to football.
It’s not necessarily the personnel I worry about. I think you can win with this group, at least ,500 is really what should be the floor..We do have players that will be difference making in games - look at the power and speed Shivers has, DJ Matthews [if he is healthy], Lucas is very fast and good so he may play this year, we brought in very good WRs Camper etc , Lucas has shown he is fast and shifty, Barner has speed for a TE and very good hands. Shiver has experience against SEC defenses and ran over Alabama's defensive players.
IU has leverage in several areas. Research, global ties, funding, large affluent alumni base, elite academic offerings and Hoops prominence among others.I would never say never. The landscape is changing dramatically. IU has very little leverage.
The academic factor isn’t that big of a deal anymore. There are all sorts of new alignments that have nothing to do with academics nor geography. We’re getting further away from the academic side of it, not closer to it.IU has leverage in several areas. Research, global ties, funding, large affluent alumni base, elite academic offerings and Hoops prominence among others.
You are not wrong in the global sense but BIG will be very very slow to give up their charter as a research-based organization/alliance. Some university might leave but none are going to be booted.The academic factor isn’t that big of a deal anymore. There are all sorts of new alignments that have nothing to do with academics nor geography. We’re getting further away from the academic side of it, not closer to it.
There’s no interest on IU’s part to leave the BiG. It’s not now nor has it ever been under consideration. The BiG ten has a similar view. We’re a member in good standing and we’ll remain so. But we have little leverage here to flex what muscles we have be they academic or athletic. In the conference hierarchy, we’re mid-pack at the very, very most in either category, as we are in any other relevant peripheral issues.The academic factor isn’t that big of a deal anymore. There are all sorts of new alignments that have nothing to do with academics nor geography. We’re getting further away from the academic side of it, not closer to it.
Double DITTOYou are not wrong in the global sense but BIG will be very very slow to give up their charter as a research-based organization/alliance. Some university might leave but none are going to be booted.
The academic factor isn’t that big of a deal anymore. There are all sorts of new alignments that have nothing to do with academics nor geography. We’re getting further away from the academic side of it, not closer to it.IU has leverage in several areas. Research, global ties, funding, large affluent alumni base, elite academic offerings and Hoops prominence among others.
See my previous response.The academic factor isn’t that big of a deal anymore. There are all sorts of new alignments that have nothing to do with academics nor geography. We’re getting further away from the academic side of it, not closer to it.
It sure sounds like Ordy's post in the past.You know this is Ordy, don't you?
The academic factor isn’t that big of a deal anymore. There are all sorts of new alignments that have nothing to do with academics nor geography. We’re getting further away from the academic side of it, not closer to it.
And only 5 seasons of 6 wins or more (3 where IU actually finished with a winning record) since Mallory was fired back in 1996 doesn't help either.Twenty-three non losing seasons of football over the last 80 years can kinda skew the forecasters a little. Sad to say, the writers have been downers on IU football for good reason. It has been too safe of a bet just to predict a losing season. Here is hoping CTA can get that trend corrected. He at least has given us some much needed hope.
Go Hoosiers!
82
sounds about right. LEO
Has IU last in the East.
The swamp up north is 2nd in the West.
I can't wait for these ridiculous divisions to be history.
IU being last in the East sounds right. Always does. Usually has been.
Has IU last in the East.
The swamp up north is 2nd in the West.
I can't wait for these ridiculous divisions to be history.
When the SEC dumps Vandy and the Mississippi schools thenNo chance we’ll ever leave the Big Ten willingly, and it’s just as likely we’ll never be asked to leave.
Well I have to say that my post did NOT age well at all.
Has IU last in the East.
The swamp up north is 2nd in the West.
I can't wait for these ridiculous divisions to be history.
I mean...Well I have to say that my post did NOT age well at all.