When you state someone is using a trope, you are not wanting a discussion but an argument. I gave you one. And you replied passive aggressively, so your stupid reply received a stupid answer. Be better. And get Trump out of you head. My goodness, I never mentioned him.
364 million verdict against the trumpster
- Thread starter kurt cloverdales
- Start date
When you state someone is using a trope, you are not wanting a discussion but an argument. I gave you one. And you replied passive aggressively, so your stupid reply received a stupid answer. Be better. And get Trump out of you head. My goodness, I never mentioned him.
It wasn't a yabbut. It was directly responsive to your rant. Maybe I misread your point. Again, sorry. Not trying to get in any arguments. Like I said, you probably know more than me about banking. I was just trying to add to the discussion about "victims." I'll bow out now. Cheers.
The State Of New York admits the case it was political through the mouth of its Attorney General.
Based on your posts, I think you would agree that this case was at least an unusual and unique application of the statute and is using the statute in a way the legislature did not intend.
It’s at least an abuse of the law for political purposes. Why would anyone defend that? Being technically free of legal fault does not mean the case was a wise use of government power.
Maybe I took it the wrong way. Still pissed about IUBB.
I stopped watching a couple of years ago. My blood pressure is lower and I sleep better.
I posted it for the entertainment value.i don't buy into that in the least. i genuinely have never disliked a president more than biden. the disaster that he's been has only been mitigated by manchin/sinema and losing the house. and i've voted dem far more than republican. i liked obama unlike many of my brethren conservatives and LOVE clinton. but biden brought progressive hell to the country right out of the gate and we're still paying the price for it
Biden year-end rating worst of modern-day presidents seeking reelection at this point: Gallup
President Biden’s year-end approval rating is worse than any other modern-day president seeking reelection’s has been at this point in the campaign cycle, a new survey found. According to Dec…thehill.com
I was responding to your Post No. 536 which says nothing about "James using her position to go after Trump and judge willing to join her." All your Post No. 536 talks about is claiming that even though Trump committed a wrong by inflating his financial statements, it is the responsibility of the banks to guard against his wrongdoing.
I'm glad you can admit that Trump committed a wrong, but you are wrong to give Trump a free pass for his wrongdoing like that. If a Republican government attorney dared to file the same suit against Trump, the same thing would happen -- Trump would immediately attack that attorney creating animosity and then claim he/she took action only because he/she was was biased against him.
Trump is not a victim, should be held accountable and doesn't get to handpick the babysitters that try to correct him.
It is when you’re weaponizing the legal system to go after your political enemies. It did not end well for Navalny but many on hear must think that’s ok
He must have a timing issue. None of these suits were brought before he was running for President. Very convenient.The fact that you are fine with what Trump did is what is wrong with this country.
So any judge that goes against trump is a biased liberal?
I guess if ever get in trouble with the law, I will just say the judge is a biased conservative.
You are if you can leverage that into $2.5 billion
Any Federal case brought in DC or NYC has ver liberal bias. To say there is Republican representation is a fraud.
NYC votes 85% Democrat. None of the verdicts or ridiculous awards would happen outside of there or DC. DEI is just sanctioned reverse discrimination that has created a golden goose of jobs for thousands of people so many have much to loose if that scam gets dismantled.
So you think Trump has had no lawsuits against him prior to being president?
That is adorable.
Some of the suits had to do with people coming forward, others arose when illegal acts were found during an investigation.
But since he was president, apparently you think his illegal activities should just be ignored.
Isn't it also politicization when Republican officeholders ignore Trump's actions to protect him?
The "weaponization" argument is not a good one.
Lol In that case any liberal stuck in court in a conservative area can cry bias and walk free?
And Trump had admitted trumpers in at least one of his juries that actually went with guilty after hearing evidence.
But all of the keyboard warriors on here who don't care to see the evidence think they know better.
I am for getting rid of any bias, across-the-board. Biden crime family says hello.
Lmao. You haven't proven bias
How about the bias of conservative politicians that have spent 3+ years trying to find a crime that Joe committed and still coming up empty handed? If Joe wasn't president, then no one would keep trying to find dirt for that long.
Biden crime family....you are hilarious. Hunter is the only one that has legal issues. No where comparable to the Trump crime family. If Republicans weren't biased, then they would be investigating Jared's dealings with Saudi arabia
James used selective prosecution to go after Trump for the sole purpose to "get him". She didn't do it because he harmed anyone, just because he is Trump.
How many other cases are pending against companies or individuals violating the statute? Is Trump the ONLY one who has inflated his assets in the entire existence of the statute? Heck, the lawsuit was so selective that now Hochul is telling others to not to worry, we are not coming for you.
And it IS the responsibility of the bank to protect itself and its shareholders against fraud. It is the fiduciary responsibility of the officers and the board to protect the entity from fraud. Hence, the due diligence.
I am not giving a free pass to Trump. I just want him to be treated fairly like everyone else. And to use a statute in a way it has never been used before and likely will never be used again with damages for no victims is an abuse of power.
Digressions is a very good poster. The board is better when he is active. We will all disagree on certain issues but having someone that will discuss issues as opposed to just dropping insults is needed.
You are in absolute denial. Is the laptop still Russian disinformation? Convenient timing of misinformation when the election was in play. The fact that Hunter is the only family member facing any charges speaks to bias rot in DOJ and FBI. Not to mention how all this got slow rolled and serious charges against him were allowed to expire.
It wasn’t a disagreement, it’s a basic misunderstanding of how economics work. To be fair to Digressions 99% of leftist are clueless (and most people on the right).
The fact that he’s Donald Trump and you don’t think anyone should pity him doesn’t mean he wasn’t openly targeted for political reasons.
Please read my post again.
How would the price of a good/service know where the increase in discretionary income came from?
A thought experiment: let's say you put your house up for auction. In auction house A, the potential buyers all have $100 dollars in their pocket. In auction house B, the potential buyers all have $10 million in their pocket.
Which auction house would you want to sell your house in? Obviously, B. It is necessarily the case. And it wouldn't matter where/how the patrons got the difference. Tax cut, stimulus, or giving hand jobs down the street.
The notion that tax cuts aren't inflationary is ridiculous. And what's worse is that an entire stage of people who want to be the Republican nominee for POTUS don't understand that either.
Sure it does. You may want more tin foil for your hat before inflation causes prices to go up. Nutso
You do realize that the fbi is led by a conservative appointed by Trump and majority of agents are conservative. But your defense is they are biased the opposite direction. Sure. Or the much more likely option that Trump is guilty as hell and Biden isn't as guilty as you wished.
i'm not sure how you're framing this makes sense re discretionary income. the free cheese, or bread really, artificially stimulates demand without stimulating supply. a better scenario is that you only have two houses available. A and B and now people have more money than ever to spend on them
So, if people get a $1000 in stimulus checks they buy goods and services? If they get a $1000 dollars in tax cuts they invest it? If they get a $1000 in inheritance, how do they spend that? If they get a $1000 scratch off, how do they spend that?
If they get a $1000 wage increase, how do they spend that? I'm sure you watched the you tube video of Jerome Powell I posted last year, when he talked about raising interest rates for fear of the wage inflation cyclone? I assume you agree with us that rising wages are inflationary?
Trump is NOT my hero.
I would just like you guys to acknowledge this is political and personal what the democrats are doing.
I bet a prosecutor so inclined could go after every democrat in the house and senate and find a grand jury to charge them for something.
I have heard of CPA firms being sued for preparing misstated financial statements for a client.
I’ve never heard of an individual being prosecuted for overestimating values on their personal financials.
I’ll bet most members of the congress and senate along with the president have understated their assets on their public filings, hiding their true net worth. None are being investigated or prosecuted.
How does it matter if the "more money" came from stimulus or giving handjobs?
Edit: What bearing does the "where" have on the price of the house?
Last edited:
I would just like you to admit that trump is guilty and the judge and jury weren't biased for coming to that conclusion after actually hearing the evidence.
The only thing remotely political might have been the prosecutor's decision to take the case, but going after someone that committed a crime is hardly wrong.
Will you admit that Republicans going after Biden is entirely political and a complete waste of taxpayer money given that they still have nothing to show for it after 3 plus years of trying. Otherwise we would be seeing impeachment charges on Biden
I don't know what you teach ... But I sure as hell can assume it's not economics.
I get your point, but on the micro level I don't thing $20 more in your take home pay is as "stimulating" as a $1000 check all at once. Joe sixpack likes that big hit. That's why so many set up their withholding to give them a big refund.
@Digressions this is what i was going to write. tax cuts don't apply to everyone. people not working. people who don't owe etc. added to what mark perfectly stated
It's actually the opposite. A $20 tax cut per week is almost certainly to be fully spent. While a $1k one time check is more likely be a combo of spent and saved/pay down debt. There has been a lot of research on this and it always comes to the same conclusion.
Stimulus increases money supply. The handjob causes the same supply of money to change hands. Unless of course….Uncle Sam is the one receiving the hand job
And I understand your point, but inflation(at least the inflation that we're discussing) happens in the aggregate.
In my example, it was $1000 and $1000. Apples to apples. The candidates didn't discuss the particulars of their proposals, but every dollar that is put into the economy would increase the aggregate supply of discretionary income and necessarily be inflationary. The source doesn't matter.
So, handjobs can be described as stimulating?
Wrong. Gun control is a topic I take very seriously and have personal reasons to do so. You made a silly joke about it. Trump will never be out of my head until your party and our country can move on from him.
Latest posts
-
What the hell are schools supposed to do to stop the war in Gaza
- Latest: mcmurtry66
-
-
