ADVERTISEMENT

Question For Lawyers and Constitutional Scholars

You got yer US Constitution.
You got yer Executive Branch.
You got yer Legislative Branch.
You got yer Judicial Branch.

You got yer state Constitution.
You got yer Executive Branch in a state.
You got yer Legislative Branch in a state.
You got yer Judicial Branch in a state.

You got Marbury v Madison that says ”The federal Court interprets the law and the Constitution. that’s why we are here.”

So now you have states putting questions on the upcoming ballot, which - while worded different - in effect say, “Dear Voter - please read the Constitution and vote yes or no - tell us if it does or does not provide/protect a right to abortion.”

Can a state legislature or a group of petition signers “legally” get such a question on the ballot, cut the courts out of the interpretation role, and use this process to interpret a Constitution?

Yes, to some extent in some places it will depend on language of the state Constitution, and without reading 50 of them, I guess it is possible for this process to have been written into a Constitution. Moreover, it would be, um, “controversial?” to suggest that “The People” have no such DIRECT role in “helping” a court and/or legislature in interpreting a Constitution. (they have multiple indirect roles - letting folks who write and interpret a Constitution, but to vote on what it means? Can a voter Constitutional interpretation be, urp, UN-Constitutional?

Could Lincoln free slaves through a war power that the Constitution did not specify? He thought he could. He did it. He felt it was “approved” by voters who kept him in office the next election, but there was no “ballot” asking voters to say “Does the Constitution allow a President to issue an Emancipation Proclamation?”

Will such a ballot ever be treated as anything but advisory? Will The People, in their righteous indignant ignorance rise up against a ruling that says “STFU, your court will tell what this means - your job is electing and lobbying your elected?

Any explanation on the penalty/no penalty?

At 1:38 of final drive Illini called for too many men on field. I was listening on Illini Radio in car at this point. Ref mic didn’t work. Just watched the play b4 that and the subsequent play. Didn’t look like IU subbed in (but maybe I missed someone off screen). Illini clearly had some 14-15 guys on field. So penalty should have stood. Did I miss something??

Also on last drive Carpenter’s snaps were often low. Haven’t watched full replay, but Were his snaps that low all night?? If so, that’s an issue.

Illini D was as good as advertised, but IU’s D played well too it looks like. Reviewing stats, looks like Hiller and Bell need to step it up in the run game, but good to be 1-0.

Portal Transfer Impact (14 portal transfers played)

Yesterday’s victory was brought to you by the transfer portal. At least 14 played.

The defensive depth brought in allowed the Illini only 3 more points after the early Illini 3rd quarter TD
This depth was key while Cam Jones went to the locker room.
Linebacker and DL by committee looks like a plan this fall
Newcomer Tevis, lined up at DT, had two monster stops

2021 Transfer DJ Mathews had a big game too.

2022 Parker Hanna was a D II LT … held up at RT after Bedford left the game … looked better than Caleb in pass pro to me

Transfer Portal Additions (since 2021 fall camp)

  1. CBJonathan Haynes (Ole Miss)
  2. DTPatrick Lucas (Ole Miss)
  3. DLLaDarrius Cox (Ole Miss)
  4. LBBradley Jennings, Jr. (Miami, Fla.)
  5. WREmery Simmons (North Carolina)
  6. RBShaun Shivers (Auburn)
  7. RBJosh Henderson (North Carolina)
  8. DEJH Tevis (California)
  9. QBConnor Bazelak (Missouri)
  10. LBJared Casey (Kentucky)
  11. LB/DE Myles Jackson (UCLA)
  12. OTParker Hanna (West Texas A&M)
  13. WRAndison Coby (Tennessee)
  14. CBBrylan Lanier (Alabama)
  15. DB – Louis Moore (Navarro C.C.)
from INDIANA — Box Score Tackle Chart … There were 10 IU TFLs to Illini 6
# Name
4 Cam Jones
21 Noah Pierre
44 Aaron Casey
23 Jaylin Williams
1 Devon Matthews
0 Dasan McCullough (sixth most tackles)
92 Alfred Bryant
19 Josh Sanguinetti
5 Bradley Jennings Jr
31 Bryant Fitzgerald
9 Brylan Lanier
8 Jared Casey
3 Tiawan Mullen
47 JH Tevis
41 Beau Robbins
51 Patrick Lucas Jr.
99 Nick James (lots of DL played)
10 Myles Jackson
17 Jonathan Haynes
16 Jordan Grier
94 Demarcus Elliott
91 LeDarrius Cox
50 Sio Nofoagatoto'a
88 AJ Barner
7 D.J. Matthews Jr.

IU FB NFL Active Roster Report after final roster cuts

McFadden and Hendershot made the final cut, today.

From https://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-depth-charts/active-nfl-players-by-college/indiana/90728

TeamPlayerPosChart Pos / Chart StringRos. StatusDraft Status
logo_thumb_BUF.gif
Saffold, RodgerOGLG - 1stActive10 02 033
logo_thumb_CAR.gif
Thomas, IanTETE - 1stActive18 04 101
logo_thumb_DAL.gif
Hendershot, PeytonTETE - 3rdActive22 CFA
logo_thumb_NYG.gif
McFadden, MicahILBMLB - 2ndActive22 05 146
logo_thumb_NYJ.gif
Feeney, DanOG/OCLG - 2ndActive17 03 071
logo_thumb_TEN.gif
Westbrook-Ikhine, NickWRSWR - 1stActive20 CFA

Tamar Bates - Will determine how far this team goes

After hearing how Tamar Bates shot in the fan fest I am beginning to think this team's success will depend on Tamar being able to hit open shots and become the scorer we thought he was when he came in last year. We have not addressed the shooting issues from last year with a transfer so the solution will have to come from within. We know Kopp can shoot in practice but seems to have trouble hitting them when the pressure is turned up during the game. My hot take is Big Ten title and sweet 16 run depend on Tamar finding a shot and becoming a scorer. If not Tamar then where does the production come from?
  • Like
Reactions: Cavanagh

Final Thoughts on Illinois

On paper Indiana should win this game. It's at the Rock, Illinois has had one winning season in the last 10 (3 in 19) playing the Big Ten West, and looking at the last five recruiting classes it's a clean sweep. I looked at Rivals and 247 and Indiana won all five classes according to both. IU also had double the four star recruits. Illinois is no juggernaut on offense and defense should be the strength of this Hoosier team. With the return to the vision zone and in all likelihood more aggressive play calling on D, this defensive group should keep Indiana in a lot of games all year.

Illinois is inexperienced in the interior of their offensive line so it would not surprise me to see Coach Allen test them with some A Gap blitzes and some stunts early. (Remember the Double A Gap blitzes under Womack?)

If Indiana can keep Illinois from getting north of 175 yards on the ground that would bode well for them. RB Brown is going to get some yards but make him earn everything - nothing cheap. Clean tackling in Game One is always a concern.

Isaiah Williams is their most explosive WR from what I've seen but I trust our secondary to keep him from going off too much.

It's nothing earth shattering but this game will probably come down to Line play and turnovers. Can we keep their run game in check and get pressure in passing situations? Can our Offensive Tackles (Bedford and Haggard) keep Illinois from getting pressure off the edge? Can our interior OL get some push and establish a running game? Will there be some diversity in the run game or are we just going to run inside zone for two yards all night? Illinois runs a 3-4 so some good interior runs early will establish some play action opportunities later on. And from what I've seen Indiana RB Shivers may relish the opportunity for some physical inside runs.

Illinois has a pretty good secondary so I will be curious to see if our WRs can make some plays against them. They will have to or it could be a long night. And of course the elephant in the room is who will be throwing the ball? Whoever it is just take care of the ball and don't try to do too much. If Illinois starts to get aggressive with blitzes hit them with a screen or slip TE Barner in where the LB blitz came from. Sometimes I think we make offense too much rocket science, take what is there. Who cares about being the smartest guy in the room, go with what works.

If I remember right Illinois missed a couple field goals last week so if he misses again early it could get into his head and be a factor in what will likely be a close game.

This is a big game and a great opportunity to create some positive momentum going forward. Go Hoosiers!

Rhett Lewis was great in the booth last night

The former Hoosier football player took over for Buck Suhr as the color commentator working with Don Fischer.

Don occasionally gets lost and doesn't remember what down it is or sometimes even who has the ball. Rhett Lewis worked very well with Fish and it certainly did not seem like it was their first broadcast together.

Most notable to me was in the last half minute of the game when the Hoosiers got down to the one yard line and Fish said they've got to spike the ball. And Lewis just flat out said no.

Poorly ref’s game

Way too many huddles to confer and slowed the game down big time. And that mysterious no call on the final drive when clearly the ref had given Bazelak the ok to snap the ball and Bazelak had the ball snapped to catch Illinois with too many men on the field. And then no one told the white hat that his mic wasn’t working as he “explained” the blown call. Finally in fairness, that was a catch by the Illinois receiver in the end zone. Didn’t game back to Indy until 2:30 last night. FS1 time stoppages and ref huddles sucked!
  • Like
Reactions: 11TOP
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT