ADVERTISEMENT

SC vs Clemson

I could see the ACC get two teams in. We don’t know yet if the committee punishes a team for losing their conference championship game. Say Clemson beats South Carolina convincingly and passes IU on the seed line but then loses a ACC title game. Does the committee drop teams whose third loss is in their 13th game?
Only way CLEM can get to the ACCCG with a win over SC is if SYR beats MIA. Otherwise it’s MIA.

CLEM’s problem is they lost to LOU.
  • Like
Reactions: Wiedersehen

We are in.

I'm glad we're going to be in but it still strikes me as odd that our "bowl game" after this great year is going to be at an opposing team's stadium that hardly any of us will get to attend. Have to win that one to get a traditional bowl game.
TBH, our team is a warm weather team. Ha. I'm not worried about going on the road after gaining this experience.

SC vs Clemson

In my view we don't have to worry too much about scenarios, we are in as long as we handle Purdue.

I could see the ACC get two teams in. We don’t know yet if the committee punishes a team for losing their conference championship game. Say Clemson beats South Carolina convincingly and passes IU on the seed line but then loses a ACC title game. Does the committee drop teams whose third loss is in their 13th game?

Woodson: "That's on me..." is getting old!

Yes..you can conform whatever narrative you want to, by using specific stats. But giving the whole story, hurts your narrative. I suspect that's why you left out specific facts. So...for the record....

Woodson took over in Atlanta in 2004. They won 13 games that year. That total doubled in 2005. They then won more games every year, culminating at 53 in 2010.

That tells a whole different story doesn't it? Shows a coach who took over a shit team, and built it back to a contender, while never suffering a setback.

In New York...he took over a sub .500 team with a month left in the season, and got them to the playoffs,and then won 54 games the next season. More than any other Knicks team in 20 years.

See the difference?
Sorry but the stats I gave were just the stats. He had experience with a press conference 365 times after a loss and only 315 times after a win. His playoff record was 18-28 and never out of the second round. Sound familiar?
  • Like
Reactions: surjay

Auburn!

Big thanks to the Gators, Sooners and Auburn yesterday!! Was hoping Vandy could have pulled it off at LSU, which they did have their chances. I can’t recall watching so many SEC games at once in years as I did last night!!
I got to thinking to my myself “man, too bad the best in the business, Ron Franklin is no longer around to call ESPN Saturday night games. He would have added to the excitement.”

TIC “okay, sweetheart!”
  • Like
Reactions: asr-9

Woodson: "That's on me..." is getting old!

For full season he had five losing NBA seasons and three winning seasons and overall more lost games than won games. 365 times he had a press conference after a loss.
Yes..you can conform whatever narrative you want to, by using specific stats. But giving the whole story, hurts your narrative. I suspect that's why you left out specific facts. So...for the record....

Woodson took over in Atlanta in 2004. They won 13 games that year. That total doubled in 2005. They then won more games every year, culminating at 53 in 2010.

That tells a whole different story doesn't it? Shows a coach who took over a shit team, and built it back to a contender, while never suffering a setback.

In New York...he took over a sub .500 team with a month left in the season, and got them to the playoffs,and then won 54 games the next season. More than any other Knicks team in 20 years.

See the difference?
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT