Only the “haves” in any of those conferences would leave, as we’ve already seen (A&M, UT, OU, SC, UCLA), and only the “haves” will leave going forward if there’s a better deal that awaits them. The “have nots” understand they’re taking out more than they contribute, and they’ll remain in place for every second that such a scenario exists for them.
We’re a “have not” inasmuch as we contribute less from a revenue perspective than we withdraw. We’ll never voluntarily walk away from that, and we’ll go kicking and screaming if someone tells us to leave (which they won’t). The middle ground that is very likely to occur at some point is that revenue will be distributed in a manner somewhat consistent with what any member contributes.