Since you ask...
150- 30 round mags, in 15 different, well placed bug out bags. Wolverines !!
Biden gets one right.
- Thread starter CO. Hoosier
- Start date
150- 30 round mags, in 15 different, well placed bug out bags. Wolverines !!
I don’t believe I’ve ever brought it up either.
Seems like I see it just as much when it’s the anti 2A people saying the 2nd is obsolete and unnecessary because it was, in theory, meant to be a protection against a tyrannical government. And since the government today would have no problem taking on the population anyway, there’s no need for it.
That’s the argument anyway.
As for Marks question, if it’s never gonna happen, then why bring it up, I would say this. When you go camping in bear country, there’s a 99.99 percent chance that no bears are going to bother you.
That doesn’t mean you don’t take precautions.
Would you rather walk naked into a cattle car, or die defending yourself with pre planning?
And you are totally wrong.
This paragraph is stupefyingly contradictory.
“I’m not a control guy but I don’t think you need that.”
Ah OK. I have maybe 100. Waiting for next time they go for $300-$500 a 10 pack.Since you ask...
150- 30 round mags, in 15 different, well placed bug out bags. Wolverines !!
I thought you meant guns. I'll reevaluate when my bumper drags the ground on range day. In the meantime I've got the cabinet above the sink to fill before the wife reclaims it. I guess it's Rural King on Fridays for 2 boxes 556 and a box of handgun ammo a week for a bit.
Put a false wall in the cabinet, tell her it's only for spices and that there is a structural member behind it. Chicks love technical lingo. ! ! !
Well you can think youre right all you want. I think youre wrong. The fact is I don't care and don't intend on giving anything up. Frankly, I've had enough of people trying to tell me what to do and what rules I should follow.
You were the one that put in your two cents on numbers, so the question is to you, not me. I wasn’t asked the question, you were based on this statement:
“I'd probably draw the line at anything capable of taking a high-capacity magazine.”
So, again what is “high-capacity”?
So? That ban expired in ‘04, almost 20 years ago. This argument is now handled by state and local jurisdictions. And since I’m in a normal jurisdiction I’m getting some of these…
600 Round Glock Assault Magazine
This "versatile" assault magazine can handle any job.
It’s only 600 rounds, so I’m thinking about doubling that with a couple of modifications
Good of you to come back and try to debate the Neanderthal and micropenis crowd.
What a fag. When all else fails insult intelligence and the phallus. The hallmark of no argument.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASo? That ban expired in ‘04, almost 20 years ago. This argument is now handled by state and local jurisdictions. And since I’m in a normal jurisdiction I’m getting some of these…
600 Round Glock Assault Magazine
This "versatile" assault magazine can handle any job.www.military.com
It’s only 600 rounds, so I’m thinking about doubling that with a couple of modifications
Barrel hot, no touchie. ... OUCH shit, holy crap.. oh man... get some butter.
The irony is Twenty and Mark, who thanked this post, are two of the ones who cry the most about how awful this board is.
I like 10. It gives a knowledgeable person in an active shooter situation a chance to count rounds and know when the magazine is empty.
We all expected you to be the one to come to the defense of those alleged to possess a micropenis. Do you a have a club? Regular meetings? Or just meet up every Jan 6?
It was actually a very cordial conversation. Twenty can get emotional about some topics. It’s weird.
One little joke about a micropenis and everyone runs for their shelter
I take this place about as seriously as a my (current) wife took me on our first date.
Last edited:
A few more attempts like this to restrict the Constitution is all it would take for major violence. And yes, the military would fracture. Their job is to defend the Constitution - not a government. You should know that, and know the difference.
Judge’s order blocking Biden-Big Tech censorship spurs free-speech debate
A federal judge’s momentous Fourth of July order barring the federal government from colluding with Big Tech to suppress speech triggered an object lesson in how one person’s free expression is another person’s misinformation.
www.washingtontimes.com
OH THAT...A few more attempts like this to restrict the Constitution is all it would take for major violence. And yes, the military would fracture. Their job is to defend the Constitution - not a government. You should know that, and know the difference.
Judge’s order blocking Biden-Big Tech censorship spurs free-speech debate
A federal judge’s momentous Fourth of July order barring the federal government from colluding with Big Tech to suppress speech triggered an object lesson in how one person’s free expression is another person’s misinformation.
Just another conspiracy theory............................................................ Proven correct. THey just keep adding up, don't they?
Always have insurance. It is clear that is what the purpose of the 2A was for. Specifically it was for exactly what Wakeboarder (Ranger) and Biden have said, it was to protect the citizenry against standing armies in the wrong hands. That paradigm doesn't currently exist. It has been something that has come up in just about every other country on the planet, including the one we belonged to until we didn't. Why? Because some percentage of Gravy SEALS of their day got fed up with their ruling class and started shooting their military grade rifles of the day.
"It won't happen here." It is literally why there is a here to begin with. "Things change." Do they? Technology does but people are people. Everywhere. The Japanese were raping and murdering their way across Asia within 2 generations of me. The Germans were genociding across Europe. The Russians, the Vietnamese, the Cambodians, the Serbians, and on and on. People do horrible shit to other people and the most effective way to do that is by seizing control of government. An armed populace is the last bulwark against that if all the normal levers have failed.
"It won't happen here." It is literally why there is a here to begin with. "Things change." Do they? Technology does but people are people. Everywhere. The Japanese were raping and murdering their way across Asia within 2 generations of me. The Germans were genociding across Europe. The Russians, the Vietnamese, the Cambodians, the Serbians, and on and on. People do horrible shit to other people and the most effective way to do that is by seizing control of government. An armed populace is the last bulwark against that if all the normal levers have failed.
But this is exactly how the system was set up to work. Checks and balances and all that. I don't understand why people see violence as the answer.A few more attempts like this to restrict the Constitution is all it would take for major violence. And yes, the military would fracture. Their job is to defend the Constitution - not a government. You should know that, and know the difference.
Judge’s order blocking Biden-Big Tech censorship spurs free-speech debate
A federal judge’s momentous Fourth of July order barring the federal government from colluding with Big Tech to suppress speech triggered an object lesson in how one person’s free expression is another person’s misinformation.
You think the system was set up for the Executive branch to go against the Constitution?
This is one judge. It's not like there are bunch of judges ruling this way.
I'd say conservatives are doing quite well at the judicial level these days. You're not the ones up in arms about the Supremes.
If you think it's fine for the Executive branch to try to block freedom of speech and we have to depend on one Federal judge to stop it, that's scary.
No I don't think that. What I think is we are in overly armed populace itching for a reason to pull the trigger.
Big tech is lefty. If government and big tech work together they can control the flow of information to younger generations whose primary source of information is online. They want to influence the minds of the youth. Getting them young is the most basic Marxist strategy.A few more attempts like this to restrict the Constitution is all it would take for major violence. And yes, the military would fracture. Their job is to defend the Constitution - not a government. You should know that, and know the difference.
Judge’s order blocking Biden-Big Tech censorship spurs free-speech debate
A federal judge’s momentous Fourth of July order barring the federal government from colluding with Big Tech to suppress speech triggered an object lesson in how one person’s free expression is another person’s misinformation.
Joe Rogan Weighs In on 2020 Election: 'How Much Voter Fraud Was There?'
Joe Rogan Weighs In on 2020 Election: 'How Much Voter Fraud Was There?'
rumble.com
Going to post a new thread on this, but not seeing much mentioned on here about this, or at least enough. Our Federal Government involved in changing general public thought - this used to be a joke in my childhood about the Evil Soviet Union and their Communist Propoganda, but now it exists as our current WH is a source.
Your side resorts to violence on a regular basis, why don’t you think it’s an answer?
Here's an example.
So? That ban expired in ‘04, almost 20 years ago. This argument is now handled by state and local jurisdictions. And since I’m in a normal jurisdiction I’m getting some of these…
600 Round Glock Assault Magazine
This "versatile" assault magazine can handle any job.
It’s only 600 rounds, so I’m thinking about doubling that with a couple of modifications
It isn't the answer. It is the last line of defense. The absolutely last tool to pull out of the belt.
That 600 rd mag video is satire. Pretty sure it was poking fun at an article.
The fact that something like that has to be explained, explains EVERYTHING.
I swear to God people think guns and ammo are weightless.
and that every blast of every round creates heat. 600 rounds would make an AR look like that dropping barrel that Elmer Fudd used to experience on looney Tunes.
And to close, Looney Tunes sums up the entire argument. I say I say, fvcking nuts they are my boy.
They're easily duped - that's been proved many times over.
Similar threads
