I submit an alternative: "I have nipples Focker... can you milk me?"
We used to learn a shit-ton from listening to Russkies and East Germans on open channels.
I don't think it was a plant, or an intentional accident, or double smokescreen, or whatever.
That said, if authentic, how/why was Goldberg added? Who created the group? Was Goldberg added instead of a similar name (Gold-someone) that auto-filled (Jesus, imagine that), OR, was this a case of the group creator using a databased "name" that wasn't actually the accurate recipient?
Who wasn't on the list that was intended? And if that person didn't make the list, how/why was his name/number/handle/whatever replaced with Goldberg? How the hell did Goldberg even get into the "system"? Who had this Goldberg guy listed in the Rolodex as a "trusted US Official", and why?
Your contacts migrate to that app (if you want it). The likely explainer is that it was a boo boo by Waltz. I mean I could not resist the temptation of offering up some ridiculous comment like "I don't think we should let POTUS know. Let's just attack right now. Screw this waiting around shit"I don't think it was a plant, or an intentional accident, or double smokescreen, or whatever.
That said, if authentic, how/why was Goldberg added? Who created the group? Was Goldberg added instead of a similar name (Gold-someone) that auto-filled (Jesus, imagine that
Who wasn't on the list that was intended? And if that person didn't make the list, how/why was his name/number/handle/whatever replaced with Goldberg? How the hell did Goldberg even get into the "system"? Who had this Goldberg guy listed in the Rolodex as a "trusted US Official", and why?
Ain't nobody breaking the navajo chitter chatter. Code Talker was a phenomenal book: https://a.co/d/4vbkoMf
Pig Latin works like a charm. My kids have no idea what it means: et'slay attackyay ethay outhishay tonightAt least use "code".
And other tribes used their own language in the military. These guys and Japanese Americans were legendary heros. Basically shit on by America, they proved their loyalty and more.
The FBI got every single email that passed through her server. This has been established over and over. It's not in doubt, except by you, I've never understood why you deny the known facts. Have you ever bothered to read Comey's statement? It's all addressed after a months long investigation. It very much sounded like he was going to charge her under the "gross negligence" standard, and I think he should have. However, he changed "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless" and then spelled out his recommendation to the DoJ:
www.fbi.gov
Why do you think Trump made the joke about Russia helping fine the missing 32,000 e-mails?The FBI got every single email that passed through her server. This has been established over and over. It's not in doubt, except by you, I've never understood why you deny the known facts. Have you ever bothered to read Comey's statement? It's all addressed. It very much sounded like he was going to charge her under the "gross negligence" standard, and I think he should have. However, he changed "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless" and then spelled out his recommendation to the DoJ:
Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government—but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.
Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI
Director Comey's statement to the press on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.
President Trump wasn't being grossly negligence - he deliberately took those documents (which were marked - unlike the HRC email containing classified information with the exception of two or three which had paragraph markings), actively tried to keep them, lied to the FBI that he returned them, and conspired with an assistant to hide them. I think HRC should have been prosecuted, but she wasn't. I think Trump should have been prosecuted, but he was elected so that's out. I've been 100 percent consistent on handling classified information and have not whined that HRC wasn't prosecuted SO therefore Trump shouldn't be. That was always one of the most ridiculous arguments made throughout this mess.
Hell yah. Did you ever see the Imitation Game with Benedict Cumberbach as Allan Turing? Incredible movie. I knew the story of him being the driving force in cracking Enigma, but had no idea after the war the British government decided that they would like to arrest Turing for being gay --a fact they knew when he was breaking Enigma. They gave Turing the choice--imprisonment or chemical castration. He chose the later and ended up committing suicide. Awful
Goat, let's be honest. We are all pretty pissed off that not one single person from the Water Cooler was added to the chat. We are angry and in mourning for our deserved opportunity to participate in the decision making at issue. This is important stuff here. The Cooler deserved better and we are entitled to let off some steam and post memes
I do know. I also know the circumstances for the bleachbit and destroying a couple of old blackberries and how Trump defenders have distorted those things beyond all recognition. Every email in question was recovered and analyzed by the FBI. They didn't get them from the Russians. That was part of Trump's misinformation tactics he constantly employs and his schtick. The consequences weren't about investigating her more, he'd already completed the investigation (many months of investigation - three years from the start to finish). He was talking about administrative consequences, such as stripping her clearance and removing access.
You're correct. I'll not respond to DANC again on this one. It's a waste of time and it is irrelevant to this situation.
Didn't see the movie, but knew about Turing. Just awful. I'm surprised the British were so against gayness, since it was so common there.
I never said the FBI didn't have them. They had them and buried them. Duh!
And on Ego Man’s side of things, this is about creating an alternative truth.
IIt's not a distractionor deflection at all. It's called precedent. It's kind of a big thing in legal circles.....
I am NOT lying when I tell this story. 6-7 yrs ago, just before I ditch FBook, I made a post that got senserd. I translated it to Spanish and reposted, it also was slammed down. Tried Russian, bamm.
Moving isn't the same as hiding.Trump ordered records moved after subpoena, Mar-a-Lago staffer said – reports
FBI has surveillance footage confirming testimony of employee who spoke to investigators, Washington Post and CNN saywww.theguardian.com
It is true, people always get told they have secure documents and never return them, move them the day before they come to look, and order security footage deleted.
I didn't say I believed it. I said it was an interesting take.
Fck! We can’t event get him to step 1 of the AA
Key words: DOJ alleges
