they need to run the idiots off of the campuses across the country.
At some time during the Vietnam War a small group of protesters occupied a building on the campus of Notre Dame.they need to run the idiots off of the campuses across the country.
are these dumbasses pro hostage taking? or for raping and murdering people? if this was the US at war, maybe I could understand. but once again what is a university president supposed to do about two waring faction half a world away.At some time during the Vietnam War a small group of protesters occupied a building on the campus of Notre Dame.
Fr. Hesburgh issued an ultimatum, leave within one hour or expulsion. Most left, those who remained were expelled.
College presidents need to grow a pair. Hesburgh had 'em even though he wasn't supposed to use 'em.
Protest all you want but your protests should not affect my life or any others that don't want anything to do with the protests.The IU protestors want IU to divest from companies involved with the US military and to stop its partnership with Crane.
I do find the turning of tables on free speech interesting. Many of the same people who are for free speech all the time suddenly want these protestors locked up.
Do I think the protestors are, at a minimum, naive? Sure. But as long as they aren't calling for direct violence they have rights. Be careful in suppression of indirect calls, many of you cheering on Israel killing Palestinians (or Ukrainians killing Russians) would lose your right to speech if that is the standard.
Protest all you want but your protests should not affect my life or any others that don't want anything to do with the protests.
Similar to the Vietnam war, these protestors are contemptible and easy to hate.At some time during the Vietnam War a small group of protesters occupied a building on the campus of Notre Dame.
Fr. Hesburgh issued an ultimatum, leave within one hour or expulsion. Most left, those who remained were expelled.
College presidents need to grow a pair. Hesburgh had 'em even though he wasn't supposed to use 'em.
The explanation was it was the tents. Below are the rules as published, structures were allowed as long as removed by 11PMI agree... But how are protesters in Dunn Meadow... Literally THE place for protesting at IU affecting anyone's life? Sounds like it was a similar situation yesterday at Ohio State....
Do you think all the protests are spontaneous student expressions about the ME war, or are they engineered by Jew hating interests who have said for decades they intend to end Israel as a state?they need to run the idiots off of the campuses across the country.
I agree. If Nazis and the KKK can demonstrate, so can these people.The IU protestors want IU to divest from companies involved with the US military and to stop its partnership with Crane.
I do find the turning of tables on free speech interesting. Many of the same people who are for free speech all the time suddenly want these protestors locked up.
Do I think the protestors are, at a minimum, naive? Sure. But as long as they aren't calling for direct violence they have rights. Be careful in suppression of indirect calls, many of you cheering on Israel killing Palestinians (or Ukrainians killing Russians) would lose your right to speech if that is the standard.
Do you think all the protests are spontaneous student expressions about the ME war, or are they engineered by Jew hating interests who have said for decades they intend to end Israel as a state?
I think it’s astounding that symbols like the swastika and confederate battle flags are banned on some campuses yet those same campuses celebrate the presence of Palestinian paraphernalia including specific support of Hamas. Those celebrations perversely prolong the conflict by sending the message to the Jew-hate ME community that they have support in America.
Your three points are obviously true. So what? I never said otherwise.So much lumping.
- not everyone one who supports Palestinians hates Jews (some are jewish)
- not everyone who wants Israel to stop taking Palestinian land by force wants Israel to disappear
- not everyone who supports Palestinians supports Hamas
and no, they don't "perversely" prolong anything. LOL. WTF. the actual conflict is deeper and more nuanced than dumb college kids on campuses or dumb old guys on Indiana basketball boards.
my dude, I'm gathering this conflict is just a new fad for you. just an outfit you put on after 10/7, like many of the kids on the streets. So much talk, so little understanding....
You’d probably find a handful if people out of a campus of 25,000 who support Hitler and more who deny the Holocaust. But those people are condemned. The Hamas supporters are accepted if not celebrated.
You’d probably find a handful if people out of a campus of 25,000 who support Hitler and more who deny the Holocaust. But those people are condemned. The Hamas supporters are accepted if not celebrated.
You are begging the question.makes one think the Israel-Palestine conflict isn't as cut-and-dry as Nazism....
Regulating time, location, and manner of speech is not anti-free speech.If you find yourself coming up with exceptions for speech you don't like, then you don't really support free speech.
Vance gets it. You have the right to protest peacefully. You do not have the right to turn our college campuses into the next San Francisco.Ben Sasse get's it. Lay out the rules and consequences clearly, then let them go about their protest.
Hence the "No littering" rule in the Florida flyer. You sure you're responding to the right person?Vance gets it. You have the right to protest peacefully. You do not have the right to turn our college campuses into the next San Francisco.
Yes. UF had a good response.Hence the "No littering" rule in the Florida flyer. You sure you're responding to the right person?
Imagine if you couldn't fall asleep in Dunn Meadow.Ben Sasse get's it. Lay out the rules and consequences clearly, then let them go about their protest.
Has nothing to do with the President. It’s the university president and state police, perhaps, but not the feds. IU had protests yesterday and Whitten called in the state police. State police threatened to arrest if they continued and today they showed up again. Whitten backed down this morning and is now allowing protests to continue as long as they don’t campout overnight in Dunn Meadow.
The President and Feds weren't involved in Kent State either. Song lyrics aren't usually considered historically accurate and "Tin soldiers and Nixon coming" in the song Ohio by CSN&Y is not accurate. Nixon didn't activate the Ohio National Guard and send them to Kent State, the Governor of Ohio called them up at the request of the Kent Mayor and sent them to Kent State.Has nothing to do with the President. It’s the university president and state police, perhaps, but not the feds. IU had protests yesterday and Whitten called in the state police. State police threatened to arrest if they continued and today they showed up again. Whitten backed down this morning and is now allowing protests to continue as long as they don’t campout overnight in Dunn Meadow.
This ain’t Nixon and Kent St with the national guard coming in. Feds learned their lesson with killing student protesters.
This is true.I agree. If Nazis and the KKK can demonstrate, so can these people.
Besides, the more exposure they get, the less popular they become.
You know, because they’re lunatics.
Marvin, I don't mind free speech. In fact we should all be for it because it is in the Constitution. What I am against the thuggery and intimidation of these protestors. Did you see that video where they were keeping a professor from going where he wanted to go? Free speech has nothing to do with impeding other's freedoms from movement. So whether we are talking about lying in the street and stopping traffic or keeping individuals from walking where they want to go then I am not for them.The IU protestors want IU to divest from companies involved with the US military and to stop its partnership with Crane.
I do find the turning of tables on free speech interesting. Many of the same people who are for free speech all the time suddenly want these protestors locked up.
Do I think the protestors are, at a minimum, naive? Sure. But as long as they aren't calling for direct violence they have rights. Be careful in suppression of indirect calls, many of you cheering on Israel killing Palestinians (or Ukrainians killing Russians) would lose your right to speech if that is the standard.
Did you see that video where they were keeping a professor from going where he wanted to go?
I stand corrected and blame the Canadian then.The President and Feds weren't involved in Kent State either. Song lyrics aren't usually considered historically accurate and "Tin soldiers and Nixon coming" in the song Ohio by CSN&Y is not accurate. Nixon didn't activate the Ohio National Guard and send them to Kent State, the Governor of Ohio called up them up at the request of the Kent Mayor and sent them to Kent State.
No not IU. It might have been Columbia.Was that at IU, I have not seen it.
I agree with a lot of what you've said here. I actually started typing out a longer post sharing some more thoughts, but I thought I'd share (possibly re-share?) this Sam Harris podcast as there is very little here I disagree with. Sam toes the line of being bluntly critical of jihadists and their sense of martyrdom and religious fanaticism while also leaving the door open for debate over Israel's retaliatory strikes on Gaza. In the end though, he's very clear - Hamas, Hezbollah and jihadists in general are clear in their intentions, are definitely an existential threat to Israel and need to be reckoned/dealt with.so much lumping...
- not everyone one who supports Palestinians hates Jews (some are jewish)
- not everyone who wants Israel to stop taking Palestinian land by force wants Israel to disappear
- not everyone who supports Palestinians supports Hamas
and no, they don't "perversely" prolong anything. LOL. WTF. the actual conflict is deeper and more nuanced than dumb college kids on campuses or dumb old guys on Indiana basketball boards.
my dude, I'm gathering this conflict is just a new fad for you. just an outfit you put on after 10/7, like many of the kids on the streets. So much talk, so little understanding....
As twenty pointed out, time location manner must be viewpoint-neutral.Regulating time, location, and manner of speech is not anti-free speech.
They told them yesterday they could stay, as long as they took down the tents.Has nothing to do with the President. It’s the university president and state police, perhaps, but not the feds. IU had protests yesterday and Whitten called in the state police. State police threatened to arrest if they continued and today they showed up again. Whitten backed down this morning and is now allowing protests to continue as long as they don’t campout overnight in Dunn Meadow.
This ain’t Nixon and Kent St with the national guard coming in. Feds learned their lesson with killing student protesters.
Here’s your president looking to repeat Kent St:
And those regs must reasonably advance other important interests, such as the orderly conduct of a school board meeting.As twenty pointed out, time location manner must be viewpoint-neutral.
Several of the protestors are professors. In the IU clip I saw yesterday the person speaking to police was a professor.Marvin, I don't mind free speech. In fact we should all be for it because it is in the Constitution. What I am against the thuggery and intimidation of these protestors. Did you see that video where they were keeping a professor from going where he wanted to go? Free speech has nothing to do with impeding other's freedoms from movement. So whether we are talking about lying in the street and stopping traffic or keeping individuals from walking where they want to go then I am not for them.
van pastor hangs out on the fringes of the web, he's gullible and naive. in other words, probably didn't happen.Was that at IU, I have not seen it.