Pulling out all the classics today!You're thinking of Mary Jane Rottencrotch.
Pulling out all the classics today!You're thinking of Mary Jane Rottencrotch.
She gives!You're thinking of Mary Jane Rottencrotch.
Suzie Creamcheese sounds like a girl who might put out. Fifty cents a feel perhaps?
There's a jazz-fusion local band well known in the Seattle area that goes by the name Smegma. I've seen them on YouTube but haven't been to one of their live shows. I imagine they'd really stink if you were down front. The acoustics are never as good so close to the Dual Showman's reverb.Her nickname around school was Suzie Headcheese.
Back in high school we called a one of our coaches who was a real a-hole, Coach Smegma... but obviously not to his faceThere's a jazz-fusion local band well known in the Seattle area that goes by the name Smegma. I've seen them on YouTube but haven't been to one of their live shows. I imagine they'd really stink if you were down front. The acoustics are never as good so close to the Dual Showman's reverb.
Boys will always be boys when it comes to cheesedicks! One of you should have placed an anonymous box of Ritz on his desk...get him think 'n while stink'n, trying to figure out what might spread well on salted cracker.Back in high school we called a one of our coaches who was a real a-hole, Coach Smegma... but obviously not to his face
How many millions did Tom Allen make? Wonder how much he gave to NIL?
Yeah, and? How is that any different than setting up a 'charity' and encouraging giving to that?Coaches and anyone in the athletic department cannot contribute to NIL collectives.
Can you imagine the giant loophole that would exist? The university could pay a coach double his salary with the agreement that they give half of it to NIL.
I still think the NCAA could put a damper on the worst part of this corruption with a couple of simple rules: A one-year sit-out for ALL transfers, including grad transfer ( no forfeiture of eligibility so the player is not permanently deprived); and no NIL money for any year in which an athlete is not eligible. This stops the tampering with players still enrolled at another school and prevents the poachers from using NIL as a means to plug n play.Yeah, and? How is that any different than setting up a 'charity' and encouraging giving to that?
It's all bullshit anyway - schools are finding a way to give indirectly to NIL - this would just be another way.
Except the NCAA can't enforce the no NIL rule you're proposing. They rolled over and gave up on that.I still think the NCAA could put a damper on the worst part of this corruption with a couple of simple rules: A one-year sit-out for ALL transfers, including grad transfer ( no forfeiture of eligibility so the player is not permanently deprived); and no NIL money for any year in which an athlete is not eligible. This stops the tampering with players still enrolled at another school and prevents the poachers from using NIL as a means to plug n play.
Right. Even the major leagues have rules on free agency. What we have now is just a free-for-all.I still think the NCAA could put a damper on the worst part of this corruption with a couple of simple rules: A one-year sit-out for ALL transfers, including grad transfer ( no forfeiture of eligibility so the player is not permanently deprived); and no NIL money for any year in which an athlete is not eligible. This stops the tampering with players still enrolled at another school and prevents the poachers from using NIL as a means to plug n play.
To me, a scholarship offer is like a contract the pros would sign, now that NIL is in effect.Except the NCAA can't enforce the no NIL rule you're proposing. They rolled over and gave up on that.
They're too busy trying to figure out how to punish Cleveland State for whatever Harbaugh has been up to the last two years...To me, a scholarship offer is like a contract the pros would sign, now that NIL is in effect.
I don't see why the NCAA couldn't require certain items in a scholarship 'contract', like the pros do, regarding when a player can enter free agency.
Surely the NCAA has some creative lawyers who can figure this out.
Can you imagine how long a coach would last at IU if he was suspended for 6 games in one season?They're too busy trying to figure out how to punish Cleveland State for whatever Harbaugh has been up to the last two years...
They could enforce the transfer stuff, but they washed their hands of players getting paid and hoped for the best in court. They lost. They can't keep a kid from getting NIL money. No more screwing kids like they did to that UCF punter with the youtube channel.To me, a scholarship offer is like a contract the pros would sign, now that NIL is in effect.
I don't see why the NCAA couldn't require certain items in a scholarship 'contract', like the pros do, regarding when a player can enter free agency.
Surely the NCAA has some creative lawyers who can figure this out.
Yeah, the NIL ship has sailed. I just think the NCAA should enforce the rules they have and I do think a scholarship should be treated like a contract. That would stop a a lot of this silliness.They could enforce the transfer stuff, but they washed their hands of players getting paid and hoped for the best in court. They lost. They can't keep a kid from getting NIL money. No more screwing kids like they did to that UCF punter with the youtube channel.
That's why I support the policies I suggested earlier in the thread. I'm all for NIL, especially given how much the universities and coaches earn off of these kids and the way the athletes have been completely isolated from the student experience. I just think that immediate eligibility and NIL in combination is a license by the "haves" to constantly poach from the "have-nots" to fill their roster needs and feeds all kinds of tampering. Sitting a year and not being allowed to profit for that year might make kids think harder about jumping ship, and might discourage top programs from poaching from other schools to immediately improve their next season. It also lessons the likelihood that schools who make the initial investment of giving a kid a scholarship, provide him a year or more of academic credit, and develop him as a player get stuck watching that investment vanish. That's why restrictions on free agency and compensation to teams that lose players is legal in the pro's. It's also why employers in other professions are allowed to place non-compete clauses in the contracts of employees who might jump to competitors and cause loss to the original employer.They could enforce the transfer stuff, but they washed their hands of players getting paid and hoped for the best in court. They lost. They can't keep a kid from getting NIL money. No more screwing kids like they did to that UCF punter with the youtube channel.
How do you know this? Source?... They can’t impose things without them being collectively bargained. ...
I don't see that as saying what you said. At all.