You just keep digging the hole.
Now you're justifying political persecutions for people you don't like.
Don't claim to believe in the Constitution.
We have a verdict -- Guilty on ALL counts
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
Now you're justifying political persecutions for people you don't like.
Don't claim to believe in the Constitution.
Your candidate is the one who called for it to be suspended.
Link? Your party is the one that keeps violating it repeatedly.
“But your Honor, I only killed her so that other guy couldn’t have her”!
Checks out I guess.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Outrage as Trump's 2022 post demanding suspension of constitution over 'fraudulent elections' resurfaces
In his 2022 post, Donald Trump suggested terminating all constitutional rules and regulations to overturn the 2020 presidential election results
Take your pick. No doubt you will parse the language and claim it doesn't mean what it says.
Oh, from 2 years ago when he was talking about a specific issue - the election.
Abraham Lincoln suspended habeus corpus - was he calling for the suspending the entire Constitution?
If you're comfortable with prosecuting political opponents, don't whine if it happens when a Republican is President.
Trump's Nov. 26 hush money sentencing called off: report
Donald Trump’s Nov. 26 sentencing in his New York hush money case was adjourned by the court as the judge weighs how to handle the prosecution in the wake of the former president’s reelection victory.
www.audacy.com
I suppose we'll all have to 'deal with it,' though I think it means different things to different people.
Just so we're on the same page, you do believe that 1) Trump cheated on Melania with Stormy Daniels and 2) He paid her hush money.
Given that Michael Cohen's prison sentence was largely based on these two facts, I just wanted to know where you're coming from.
Trump's Nov. 26 hush money sentencing called off: report
Donald Trump’s Nov. 26 sentencing in his New York hush money case was adjourned by the court as the judge weighs how to handle the prosecution in the wake of the former president’s reelection victory.
He paid her money. Not a crime. He did not sleep with her. Trump is a massive germaphobe and she's not his type. Now Karen McDougal...
She was his type:
Stoll, how would you go about writing off breast in plants as a business tax defuction for a "client" ?
Why would he pay her money if he didn't sleep with her?
Just to be nice? Doesn't seem like that kind of guy to me.
To spare Melania. The media was going to run with it even though they knew it was bs.
Why would Stormy deny that there was any sex? Just to be nice?
Stormy did not deny that a meet-up for sex occurred.
I think that she remarked that he couldn't tell if his tiny McMurt-like 2 inch mushroomy needle dick made it in or not. It was apparently a decent attempt, as she offered to give a description of some supposedly identifying characteristics of his tiny little member.
Not only did she not deny it, she testified in court to it happening. Your retelling is pretty much what she said.
She's MY type!She was his type:
No jail time no punishment whatsoever. Nothing. Oh and he's being sworn in as POTUS in 10 days. And the case will 100% be reversed on appeal. And the Marxist judge wished him godspeed and good luck.
So yeah.
Convicted felon. It is the least serious case and it shouldn’t have gone to trial IMO, but he was convicted and is a felon. Can’t even vote in Florida now.
It’s pretty amazing that in the long history of this country, no former president had EVER been criminally prosecuted until this case.
Which resulted in no punishment of ANY KIND.
If there was ever a shred of doubt whatsoever about what this case represented, it can certainly be put to bed now.
Complete political hackery of the very worst kind.
Which resulted in no punishment of ANY KIND.
If there was ever a shred of doubt whatsoever about what this case represented, it can certainly be put to bed now.
Complete political hackery of the very worst kind.
The judge decided not to award a sentence or other punishment because Trump is about to be President. He telegraphed this several days ago.
I don’t think the case should have gone to trial, but it did.
Also, Nixon was about to be indicted when Ford pardoned him. Clinton was disbarred because of his perjury.
Last edited:
So had he lost they might have actually sent a former President to Rikers for a made up crime while they let murderers roam the streets in NYC? Wow. That doesn't really help your case.
What? That makes no sense. I’m not making a case. I don’t know what his sentence would be.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Eliminating DEI/CRT/anti-racism in university administration- Latest: JamieDimonsBalls
-
