We have a verdict -- Guilty on ALL counts
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
So that matters to you now? Priceless.
But not the last time.. Ok We all get it.. AT ALL COST.
I've never advocated someone who isn't the nominee being placed on the ballot.
You are right, he fixed the judges and has them in his pockets. He lies, He cheats, and anyone else would go to jail but everyone still sins his praises. 2 Tier justice system.
You got Trump Devotion Syndrome bad. It has you deranged. Your Lord T isn’t the savior of the party, he’s the destroyer.
The Dems just did...again. Do what the Dems do. The issue with what Murt is saying is that the Dems have all the power in the swing states...MI, PA, WI, AZ. Trump couldn't cheat there if he wanted to. His chance to cheat or stop the cheating was 2020 but he had Bushy Bill Barr in there as his AG who hid the Hunter laptop from him and refused to stop all the illegality in the swing states before the election even began which he could've done. Trump's biggest mistake ever.
That said. Don't worry we're going to win big.
Trump is the only Republican who can win 2024. If you don't know that you're nuts.
No, it is you who are blind and nuts. Put Haley, Christie, or Scott at the top of the ticket and you win in a landslide. Independents like me would jump at the chance to not vote to Kamala. We just need someone not named Trump.
You forgot racist too.. We all know it’s your favorite word.
Mitt Romney won independents by double digits. Doesn't mean much. Again don't worry. We have God on our side. We can't lose. MAGA 🍊
Total chills?? God you guys have mastered the cringe factor with your slavish devotion. It's embarrassing.
No we have trump on our side. The guy who can’t beat anyone at this point. And you can’t get worse than Harris walz. Sucks.
She’s brutal but I would take her in a heartbeat over Harris walzThe Democratic party says "Hold my beer..."
You better or she'll have you sleeping with the fishes.
I will never vote for a 3rd party candidate that is not viable. I'd stay home instead. I will hold my nose and vote Kamala. That's how little I think of Trump.
Shame on both parties. It didn't have to be this way.
I legitimately do not understand this attitude. What exactly is it about Trump that makes him the ONLY one who can win the election?
He's certainly at the top of the list of Republicans that could lose this race.
Did you not see 2022? MAGA would 100% stay home if the nominee was anyone but Trump. I warned everyone that would happen if he didn't get an audit of 2020. He's absolutely the only one that can win this year.
Someone, please argue about this kind of thinking not being cult like.
There are hundreds of state and federal prosecutors in the U.S.
All of them had political connections (i.e. Republican or Democrat) when they were elected or appointed to their offices.
There is no law or rule that says a person can not be prosecuted by a prosecutor from the other party.
Why would anyone stay home? You think people’s issues and grievances would magically go away if Trump isn’t the nominee? You think his policies are so different from anyone else’s?
Hell no. That’s really really dumb. Conservatives are going to vote republican whether Trump is the nominee or not.
We’d actually GAIN voters if Trump weren’t the candidate, just because he’s such an asshole.
this is the dumbest logic. can't win with him or without him lol. he's hte only fool capable of losing to harris out of all of the candidates.
Looks like you are wrong again:
When Wisconsin ballots will show Kamala Harris after Biden's exit
The official certification process and potential changes to the ballot will depend on the outcome of the Democratic National Convention.
www.wisn.com
Harris is not relegated to being a write-in candidate in Wisconsin. The deadline is not even here yet.
Or:
Dems: We have a candidate who is old and senile. KICK HIM OUT.
Reps: We have a candidate who is old and senile. RALLY AROUND HIM.
Agreed.
It is also true that bias by Republican prosecutors should not be a factor in refusing to file charges against fellow Republicans.
However you want to phrase it, fact is we spent months here openly rooting for the parties to both do what the Dems actually did.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
that's why the judge/jury have to rule on it. If found guilty, then looks like the prosecutor had a legit case.
Bias shouldn't be a factor either way (see Judge Cannon for example of biased judge).
Last edited by a moderator:
But they do have to be legally appointed as Smith never was. See the docs case. This is going nowhere.
Let’s not lose sight of WHY the Dems did what they did.
What had to have been glaringly obvious to those around him for some time suddenly became glaringly obvious to the whole world. Joe is toast mentally. And suddenly everyone knew it.
They were collapsing in the polls. They had no choice.
If it weren’t for the disastrous debate, Joe would still be the nominee.
So let’s not give the Dems TO much credit here.
I'm in no way trying to imply that they did this to save the republic. They did it to win. The Repubs could have made the same move (although it would have been much more difficult to pull off), and then they'd be the driver's seat right now, by a country mile.
