Is this some sort of veiled shot at DeVries? Sorry, didn't read all the posts... But he was shooting nearly 50% from the 3, so your comparison, if it was an attempt to compare McGrady and DeVries shoulder issues, is absurd.I had a labrum repair and had the same surgeon that worked on Tracy McGrady. McGrady was shooting even worse than usual and said he had a shoulder injury. He started wearing some kind of adhesive bandage on his shoulder. The surgeon said they couldn’t see any problems on imaging but took a surgical look see because McGrady was insistent. During the surgical look they found no problems at all. The surgeon’s position was that it must have been some kind of psychological coping mechanism to explain his horrific shooting slump. When McGrady had a shooting slump it was worse than bad. His shooting percentages were bad with his normal game.
Of curse not. Jeez he was shooting very good. My God.Is this some sort of veiled shot at DeVries? Sorry, didn't read all the posts... But he was shooting nearly 50% from the 3, so your comparison, if it was an attempt to compare McGrady and DeVries shoulder issues, is absurd.
The correct answer, for those following, is that DeVries was with an entirely new team, and played against Pitt, Gonzaga, Louisville, and Arizona, in those 8 games. It was a step up in size, athleticism, etc... So he was adjusting to being able to finish inside, I'm sure. But obviously he hadn't lost his shooting touch...
We'll find out next season if he was going to adjust and start finishing better inside against better competition. I suspect he was, and will.
He’s more obsessed with IU than most IU fans. Pretty wild and also pathetic.You sure do spend a lot of time thinking about IU and analyzing data of IU players.
So just a side story... Got it.Of curse not. Jeez he was shooting very good. My God.
I spent 20 minutes on the last page responding to the assertions.So just a side story... Got it.
Was just odd because someone in the post was questioning DeVries shooting, and DeVries went down with a shoulder injury, and detractors have questioned how severe that injury was... And there was no other context for the McGrady story.
Shoulder injuries were part of the story and apologise it wasn’t clear.So just a side story... Got it.
Was just odd because someone in the post was questioning DeVries shooting, and DeVries went down with a shoulder injury, and detractors have questioned how severe that injury was... And there was no other context for the McGrady story.
I always hated McGrady-couldn’t stand his style of play and when he was together with Yao-unbearable.So just a side story... Got it.
Was just odd because someone in the post was questioning DeVries shooting, and DeVries went down with a shoulder injury, and detractors have questioned how severe that injury was... And there was no other context for the McGrady story.
Ha ha...no, my bad for not reading further back. He's going to be a good wing for us. But we need some speed and athleticism around him.Shoulder injuries were part of the story and apologise it wasn’t clear.
I was never a big TMac fan myself.I always hated McGrady-couldn’t stand his style of play and when he was together with Yao-unbearable.
DeVries has made 2.5 3s per game over his career.I'm not sure Tucker would even make it in the top 20 of the BT, shooting the 3, Purdue alone has 4 players shooting over 40% from three for their career. Loyer, Heide, Cox and Smith.
So glad to see a 3 pt shot with nice trajectory. I am so tired of the flat fastball 3’s.Ha ha...no, my bad for not reading further back. He's going to be a good wing for us. But we need some speed and athleticism around him.
You can't point out he shot only 9 of 30 for 30% from two and say that is a small sample size and then apply he shot 47% from three in the same sample size, its either both or neither. I can tell you Fletcher Loyer shot 59% for Purdue his first 8 games, but he ended up shooting 45% for the year, something happened, BT games started, they start coaching to take away players strengths. Percentages drop, better completion. Tucker should be an upgrade, but his overall stats are pretty average.Yeah. Last year he only took 30 2’s before going down and hit 9 of them so small sample and well below his career stats.
Loyer shot 59% his first 8 games against Alabama, @Marquette, Nc State and Ole Miss, two those are still playing, it still is just a small sample size. Loyer after 3 years is shooting 44% from 3 and DeVries is shooting 36.7%. Who knows what they are going to next year, but some on here are saying Tucker is lock 1st team BT, just like Ballo, Rice and Carlye were all world last year! Rinse and repeat. And some wonder about expectations? Geesh!Is this some sort of veiled shot at DeVries? Sorry, didn't read all the posts... But he was shooting nearly 50% from the 3, so your comparison, if it was an attempt to compare McGrady and DeVries shoulder issues, is absurd.
The correct answer, for those following, is that DeVries was with an entirely new team, and played against Pitt, Gonzaga, Louisville, and Arizona, in those 8 games. It was a step up in size, athleticism, etc... So he was adjusting to being able to finish inside, I'm sure. But obviously he hadn't lost his shooting touch...
We'll find out next season if he was going to adjust and start finishing better inside against better competition. I suspect he was, and will.
You can't point out he shot only 9 of 30 for 30% from two and say that is a small sample size and then apply he shot 47% from three in the same sample size, its either both or neither. I can tell you Fletcher Loyer shot 59% for Purdue his first 8 games, but he ended up shooting 45% for the year, something happened, BT games started, they start coaching to take away players strengths. Percentages drop, better completion. Tucker should be an upgrade, but his overall stats are pretty average.
See thing is...no one expects this. But its.a.sweet argument for those.wanting to say expectations here are ridiculous.I would say being able to build a “program” is a bigger need. If we expect immediate final fours and championships, we will be doing this again in 3 years
This has to be one of the dumbest post ever.You can't point out he shot only 9 of 30 for 30% from two and say that is a small sample size and then apply he shot 47% from three in the same sample size, its either both or neither. I can tell you Fletcher Loyer shot 59% for Purdue his first 8 games, but he ended up shooting 45% for the year, something happened, BT games started, they start coaching to take away players strengths. Percentages drop, better completion. Tucker should be an upgrade, but his overall stats are pretty average.
Stirtz is probably just as good... And Texas Tech has some DUDES... But I gotta think Tucker, and maybe even a couple more of the WVU guys, were a small part of the decision for Dolson to lock in on DeVries how he did.
Man, I hope he'll be fully healthy. Its been a while since IU has had a guy like him.
Loyer shot 59% his first 8 games against Alabama, @Marquette, Nc State and Ole Miss, two those are still playing, it still is just a small sample size. Loyer after 3 years is shooting 44% from 3 and DeVries is shooting 36.7%. Who knows what they are going to next year, but some on here are saying Tucker is lock 1st team BT, just like Ballo, Rice and Carlye were all world last year! Rinse and repeat. And some wonder about expectations? Geesh!
Slightly bigger than Knecht I believe.
Stirtz is a gamer. A player.Stirtz' #s are better. Tucker's better than anyone we had.
What are you talking about? We don't give a shit what Fletcher frickin Loyer did. The last time I cared to pay attention to him he was smiling and talking shit with our crowd, then proceeding to get DESTROYED, by a mediocre Indiana team...and then losing whatever games out of whatever coming down the stretch.Loyer shot 59% his first 8 games against Alabama, @Marquette, Nc State and Ole Miss, two those are still playing, it still is just a small sample size. Loyer after 3 years is shooting 44% from 3 and DeVries is shooting 36.7%. Who knows what they are going to next year, but some on here are saying Tucker is lock 1st team BT, just like Ballo, Rice and Carlye were all world last year! Rinse and repeat. And some wonder about expectations? Geesh!
Yes!See thing is...no one expects this. But its.a.sweet argument for those.wanting to say expectations here are ridiculous.
They're not. I.csnt speak for everyone. But I can tell you what I expect:
1. Not to lose repeatedly by 15+.
2. Be competitive in the conference (Top 4)
3. Be a legit 2nd weekend threat.
4. Perennial Top 20 program.
That should be expected here. And yes..it can be done quickly. With the right hire.
I was careful to label career and single year stats. You are the one mixing and matching.You can't point out he shot only 9 of 30 for 30% from two and say that is a small sample size and then apply he shot 47% from three in the same sample size, its either both or neither. I can tell you Fletcher Loyer shot 59% for Purdue his first 8 games, but he ended up shooting 45% for the year, something happened, BT games started, they start coaching to take away players strengths. Percentages drop, better completion. Tucker should be an upgrade, but his overall stats are pretty average.
Tracy McLazy?I was never a big TMac fan myself.
Tuckers senior year a Waukee HS he and sandfort brothers along with top ten rated recruit Omaha beliue dominated Iowa HS ranks and won title.Sandfort and Devries played on the same high school team.