The UN Council on Human Rights is a specific example of a largely useless international effort which has run amok. The Paris accords is another example of a vague and ineffectual effort that is there for its own sake. Making large and mostly vague multi-lateral deals with many diverse interests is not necessarily better than a series of bi-lateral or tri-lateral arrangements with stronger and clearer mutual interests.
The USMCA is an improvement in many ways over NAFTA, including leveling the playing field for manufacturing and stiffening intellectual property rules. I don't share your view that TPP would be an effective counterweight to China. China quickly and easily figured out how to take advantage of NAFTA; a situation which the USMCA also addresses. Would the TPP be different from NAFTA in that respect?
We're not doing bilateral deals. That's the point. NAFTA 2.0? Give me a break....it's the same deal with some slight ratio changes related to the auto industry, and a new name. Don't be a sucker. And I don't give a hoot about the useless UN.....that's not what we are talking about.
We're on the entirley wrong path with no solutions in sight.
Xi and Trump Should Swallow Their Pride and Join the TPP
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/2...-their-pride-and-join-the-tpp-trade-us-china/
Last edited: