ADVERTISEMENT

Shooting at Greenwood Mall

376

THREE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX.

The guy in Greenwood just outclassed them all.
Responding to my own post, so meta.

But, just spitballing here. The dude in Greenwood. Do we know if he's off duty law enforcement? I only ask b/c shouldn't he be the type who SHOULD be law enforcement? Calm (apparently), collected and accurate. Made what seems to be a good decision in a very stressful situation and did so without injuring anybody other than the assailant.
 
Well, our perceptions of downtown Indy are very different.
Chicago...well, I don't live there, so I can't offer a response.
Moved to Indianapolis in 1972. Being downtown was scary at night as the streets were vacant of people.

Now as Yogi Berra might say, "Nobody goes downtown, because it is too crowded".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulk VanderHuge
Moved to Indianapolis in 1972. Being downtown was scary at night as the streets were vacant of people.

Now as Yogi Berra might say, "Nobody goes downtown, because it is too crowded".
And yet, the rate of new housing construction (apartments, houses, townhomes, condos, renovations) continues at a furious pace, and properties for sale don't last long. Those builders must know something.
 
Responding to my own post, so meta.

But, just spitballing here. The dude in Greenwood. Do we know if he's off duty law enforcement? I only ask b/c shouldn't he be the type who SHOULD be law enforcement? Calm (apparently), collected and accurate. Made what seems to be a good decision in a very stressful situation and did so without injuring anybody other than the assailant.
As opposed to these guys...
 
I’m not sure who you hang out with but I’m around a lot of gun owners and I’ve not seen or heard any of them posture to the point you are stating. Inmho that is way overblown. Are there instances of people like this? Yes but it’s not rampant among them. This is why it’s hard to engage discussion because people dismiss guys like me. My first reaction is not to use force. It’s quite the opposite and most if not all people I know are the same.
There are lots of studies on gun ownership and the things that gun owners over and underestimate

they overstimate
-their skills
-their safety consciousness
-the likelihood of using the weapon to prevent a crime

they underestimate
-the likelihood that the weapon will be used against someone in their household, by accident or by unexpected behaviors of a family member
-the likelihood that their weapon will be stolen
-the likelihood that their weapon will be used against them
--the likelihood that the weapon will not be accessible in the timeframe needed to provide protection
 
And yet, the rate of new housing construction (apartments, houses, townhomes, condos, renovations) continues at a furious pace, and properties for sale don't last long. Those builders must know something.
I have lived in the Indy Metro area for over 20 years now (either within the city limits itself or the major suburbs surrounding). My wife has lived here her whole life. There are some things that have improved and some that have gotten worse. The development downtown is really quite something. It continues and there are quite a bit of things that are cool about living in this area.

That being said, there has been a noticeable uptick in crime...particularly murders since I moved here back in 2001. And that stuff is starting to spread to the outlying areas as well. I have been in Hamilton County in various places for 17 years.

It felt more "safe" downtown in 2001 when things were just really starting to ramp up from an improvement standpoint then it does now. Then again, you have a gunman shooting up the Greenwood Mall. The fact of the matter is that we have raised a society with a too large percentage of sociopaths. And we see the damage they wreak every night when we turn on the evening news. Missed in the Greenwood shooting was another one in Beech Grove park last night.

Downtown Indy is generally "safe" as long as you stay within a certain area centered around the circle and then up and down certain corridors.
 
You know, this one had an ending that saved lives (at least initially). No one can deny that.

My concern is that the young man gets a bunch of positive publicity which prompts a bunch of yahoos to carry guns to be a wild west good guy.

The net result is more lives lost.

The only answer is less guns...not more guns.
Agreed. How do people know who the good guy and the bad guy is when multiple people pull out their guns? Was he allowed to be carrying at the mall?
 
Agreed. How do people know who the hood guy and the bad guy is when multiple people pull out their guns? Was he allowed to be carrying at the mall?
I think that legally you can carry at the mall but the mall has a policy that requests you do not. So the Mall could have asked him to leave or put him on a no trespass list but I don't think there would be any legal penalties for the guy. I could be wrong on that though.
 
I’m not sure who you hang out with but I’m around a lot of gun owners and I’ve not seen or heard any of them posture to the point you are stating. Inmho that is way overblown. Are there instances of people like this? Yes but it’s not rampant among them. This is why it’s hard to engage discussion because people dismiss guys like me. My first reaction is not to use force. It’s quite the opposite and most if not all people I know are the same.
Waisting your time with Shooter.

I too know many gun owners. I’ve never seen one of them display their gun. I did have a surgeon and his wife sitting in my office. I noticed a gun strapped to his ankle when his pants leg pulled up a little. He noticed the look on my face when I saw it. He calmly explained in todays environment he felt he needed the protection. His wife also had a weapon in her purse. Both had attended a week long camp where they learned to use their weapons. In the last year or so I’ve been amazed to learn many clients and friends have guns they carry in their vehicles. I didn’t learn of their guns by them brandishing them and making cocky statements. It’s almost always when having a quiet discussion about these mass shooting that they will quietly mention they have concealed weapon in their vehicle.
 
Waisting your time with Shooter.

I too know many gun owners. I’ve never seen one of them display their gun. I did have a surgeon and his wife sitting in my office. I noticed a gun strapped to his ankle when his pants leg pulled up a little. He noticed the look on my face when I saw it. He calmly explained in todays environment he felt he needed the protection. His wife also had a weapon in her purse. Both had attended a week long camp where they learned to use their weapons. In the last year or so I’ve been amazed to learn many clients and friends have guns they carry in their vehicles. I didn’t learn of their guns by them brandishing them and making cocky statements. It’s almost always when having a quiet discussion about these mass shooting that they will quietly mention they have concealed weapon in their vehicle.
That to me would be the point. You don't want people to know. Open carry just makes you a target.
 
Responding to my own post, so meta.

But, just spitballing here. The dude in Greenwood. Do we know if he's off duty law enforcement? I only ask b/c shouldn't he be the type who SHOULD be law enforcement? Calm (apparently), collected and accurate. Made what seems to be a good decision in a very stressful situation and did so without injuring anybody other than the assailant.
Yeah I was immediately interested in his background. Former military , etc?
 
  • Like
Reactions: larsIU
There are lots of studies on gun ownership and the things that gun owners over and underestimate

they overstimate
-their skills
-their safety consciousness
-the likelihood of using the weapon to prevent a crime

they underestimate
-the likelihood that the weapon will be used against someone in their household, by accident or by unexpected behaviors of a family member
-the likelihood that their weapon will be stolen
-the likelihood that their weapon will be used against them
--the likelihood that the weapon will not be accessible in the timeframe needed to provide protection
Lol. I carry for my protection not for others. Things the left are good at are assuming…every gun owner is a criminal… gun owners shoot at everything….gun owners worship the weapon. I’m not sure why every time I say I carry I automatically become some imbecile in your(s) eyes? I’m the guy the leftists anti-gun guys hate because I do none of those things. You won’t catch me in a gun store more than 1-2 times a year. You won’t catch me waving my guns in the air. You won’t catch me letting kids play with them. You won’t catch me leaving them out without trigger locks. One thing is very clear though…you won’t catch me unarmed/helpless ever again.
 
Waisting your time with Shooter.

I too know many gun owners. I’ve never seen one of them display their gun. I did have a surgeon and his wife sitting in my office. I noticed a gun strapped to his ankle when his pants leg pulled up a little. He noticed the look on my face when I saw it. He calmly explained in todays environment he felt he needed the protection. His wife also had a weapon in her purse. Both had attended a week long camp where they learned to use their weapons. In the last year or so I’ve been amazed to learn many clients and friends have guns they carry in their vehicles. I didn’t learn of their guns by them brandishing them and making cocky statements. It’s almost always when having a quiet discussion about these mass shooting that they will quietly mention they have concealed weapon in their vehicle.
The problem they see is”gun owner” which becomes “gun worshiper”. They have no use for people like me.
 
I have lived in the Indy Metro area for over 20 years now (either within the city limits itself or the major suburbs surrounding). My wife has lived here her whole life. There are some things that have improved and some that have gotten worse. The development downtown is really quite something. It continues and there are quite a bit of things that are cool about living in this area.

That being said, there has been a noticeable uptick in crime...particularly murders since I moved here back in 2001. And that stuff is starting to spread to the outlying areas as well. I have been in Hamilton County in various places for 17 years.

It felt more "safe" downtown in 2001 when things were just really starting to ramp up from an improvement standpoint then it does now. Then again, you have a gunman shooting up the Greenwood Mall. The fact of the matter is that we have raised a society with a too large percentage of sociopaths. And we see the damage they wreak every night when we turn on the evening news. Missed in the Greenwood shooting was another one in Beech Grove park last night.

Downtown Indy is generally "safe" as long as you stay within a certain area centered around the circle and then up and down certain corridors.
I pretty much agree.
The murder rate has ramped up, there is no doubt of that...the stats are right there. I don't own a gun, and neither do my friends/family, or other people i hang out with, and we're not out drinking/getting high at 2 o'clock in the morning on the near east or far east side (or even the Canal), so I feel pretty safe to walk to the Central Library, on the Cultural trail, the Monon, or over to White River State park. Not saying nothing will ever happen, but I feel like I have reduced the odds to almost nil. Downtown Indy is certainly not the "dangerous shithole" 76-1 wants everyone to believe. Greenwood Park Mall, on the other hand...

And I say all this as a person who is very happy that the man at the GPM had a gun, and was able to use it in an expert fashion.
 
I pretty much agree.
The murder rate has ramped up, there is no doubt of that...the stats are right there. I don't own a gun, and neither do my friends/family, or other people i hang out with, and we're not out drinking/getting high at 2 o'clock in the morning on the near east or far east side (or even the Canal), so I feel pretty safe to walk to the Central Library, on the Cultural trail, the Monon, or over to White River State park. Not saying nothing will ever happen, but I feel like I have reduced the odds to almost nil. Downtown Indy is certainly not the "dangerous shithole" 76-1 wants everyone to believe. Greenwood Park Mall, on the other hand...

And I say all this as a person who is very happy that the man at the GPM had a gun, and was able to use it in an expert fashion.
I’ve felt more unsafe downtown Bloomington(not bad) at night than in Indy. More Police presence in Indy around those areas. Generally safe. Downtown Chicago is the same.
 
Things the left are good at are assuming…every gun owner is a criminal… gun owners shoot at everything….gun owners worship the weapon.
I am ASSUMING absolutely nothing and...

I am absolutely NOT arguing that people should not be allowed to own (non-AR15) style guns, if they are trained and are mentally stable.

What I am pointing out are the cold hard STATISTICAL FACTS, that if you own a firearm, these are the most likely people to be shot by that firearm, most to least

-nobody (that's good!)
-the gun owner
-a family member of the gun owner
-a non-criminal friend /neighbor / buddy of the gun owner
-an invader

More intensive and frequent training is needed. It should be tough enough that a lot of average Joes wouldn't be able to pass.
 
Last edited:
I pretty much agree.
The murder rate has ramped up, there is no doubt of that...the stats are right there. I don't own a gun, and neither do my friends/family, or other people i hang out with, and we're not out drinking/getting high at 2 o'clock in the morning on the near east or far east side (or even the Canal), so I feel pretty safe to walk to the Central Library, on the Cultural trail, the Monon, or over to White River State park. Not saying nothing will ever happen, but I feel like I have reduced the odds to almost nil. Downtown Indy is certainly not the "dangerous shithole" 76-1 wants everyone to believe. Greenwood Park Mall, on the other hand...

And I say all this as a person who is very happy that the man at the GPM had a gun, and was able to use it in an expert fashion.
Indy has a 42nd and Post problem. You start going south of Ft. Ben on Post Rd and you are driving through one of the worst areas in the state froma gun violence perspective. It isn't all there, but it is the epicenter. For people who have to travel through areas to get to downtown Indy, the area they have to traverse is going to inform their view of Indianapolis.

This is anecdotal, but when the crime in Indy stuff starts to pop up on social media (usually comments to news articles), some of the most vocal about how bad Indianapolis is are people posting from Greenfield. And that makes sense. They have to travel E. Washington which runs through areas to its immediate north and south which are among the worst for shooting in the state. Yeah, the zoo looks great over there but I turn on my TV and every night there are people getting shot up in the neighborhoods I have to drive through to get there.

Coming from the north you hit that area around the fairgrounds. From the West is that Lafayette Square area. Not as terrible if rolling through Speedway. The south you are coming through Beech Grove which is a little enh, but not much on the shootings side. I know it is completely anecdotal but I think those areas outside of downtown impact how people feel about downtown. The troubles around the canal not withstanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulk VanderHuge
I am ASSUMING absolutely nothing and...

I am absolutely NOT arguing that people should not be allowed to own (non-AR15) style guns, if they are trained and are mentally stable.

What I am pointing out are the cold hard facts, that if you own a firearm, these are the most likely people to be shot by that firearm, most to least

-nobody (that's good!)
-the gun owner
-a family member of the gun owner
-a non-criminal friend /neighbor / buddy of the gun owner
-an invader

More intensive and frequent training is needed. It should be tough enough that a lot of average Joes wouldn't be able to pass.
Should be taught in places you would dispute. Used to be taught at home and school but that would be to easy and shot down. See the problem with guys like me is I’m a conundrum to you. I’m the middle guy who you cant grasp. You are looking for an argument from me. An argument I don’t fit. You have no idea what an average Joe looks like. You also assume none of us have been through safety courses. Guess what? Most of us do.
 
you have no idea what an average Joe looks like.
I am relying on studies that analyzed MILLIONS of gun owners in the USA. The stats are not my opinions. They aren't anyone's opinions. Such studies can give an understanding of the "average gun owner"
You also assume none of us have been through safety courses.
Where? Totally false. I am merely saying that in many places there is not enough training, both in depth and in frequency. Taking a course 20 years ago probably doesn't help anyone, now. There have also been many cases of a person buying an AR15 for the first time and mowing down people DAYS later. The shooter in such cases obviously did not have weeks of training. He had a 10 minute pep talk, if even that.
Guess what? Most of us do.
Good for you. What about the shooters, in mass shootings. Were they well-trained and screened? This is a case where we need a high bar, because the outlier nutjob does such tremendous damage. We then need laws tough enough to deter the outlier nutjob, while inconveniencing responsible people like you to the smallest extent possible.
 
Waisting your time with Shooter.

I too know many gun owners. I’ve never seen one of them display their gun. I did have a surgeon and his wife sitting in my office. I noticed a gun strapped to his ankle when his pants leg pulled up a little. He noticed the look on my face when I saw it. He calmly explained in todays environment he felt he needed the protection. His wife also had a weapon in her purse. Both had attended a week long camp where they learned to use their weapons. In the last year or so I’ve been amazed to learn many clients and friends have guns they carry in their vehicles. I didn’t learn of their guns by them brandishing them and making cocky statements. It’s almost always when having a quiet discussion about these mass shooting that they will quietly mention they have concealed weapon in their vehicle.
Many of the people I know own guns and many of them carry. You would have a very difficult time knowing that they carry I would almost bet you would have zero clue. The general perception of gun owners is terrible and threads like this reinforce to me what I believe to be true.

Thank goodness for the guy in the mall, whether he was off duty cop or just a calm cool and collected guy who IMO did the right thing. The biggest driver of emotion in America is fear, if you take away fear generally bad things happen. I don't think these individuals (mass shooters) have a fear of death so they act the way they do, the real safety a gun brings to individuals like me is that the other millions of criminals still have fear, and if they don't know what I have then fear has to exist and hopefully keeps them away from me. Take away guns for law abiding citizens and you take a lot of fear away from criminals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 76-1
Take away guns for law abiding citizens and you take a lot of fear away from criminals.
It's a good thing that almost nobody wants to take away guns (non-AR15s, anyway) from mentally stable law abiding 21+- yo citizens.
 
Last edited:
Let’s think this through. Because we have a societal problem of people with guns killing is mass shooting incidents, we need more people with guns to kill the mass shooters. That’s pretty messed up.
I was at my local coffee shop last week listening to two old dudes talk while I waiting for my coffee. One dude said people who don’t own guns in the neighborhood feel safer because of the people who own guns.

Yes, my former gun nut, liberal-hating, homophobe, and Q conspiracist next door neighbor made me feel much safer.
 
There are lots of studies on gun ownership and the things that gun owners over and underestimate

they overstimate
-their skills
-their safety consciousness
-the likelihood of using the weapon to prevent a crime

they underestimate
-the likelihood that the weapon will be used against someone in their household, by accident or by unexpected behaviors of a family member
-the likelihood that their weapon will be stolen
-the likelihood that their weapon will be used against them
--the likelihood that the weapon will not be accessible in the timeframe needed to provide protection
In my experience this is pretty spot on. When I talk with my gun-owning friends, they're often dumbfounded and incredulous that I'd even bring up things in the 'underestimate' column as even remote possibilities.

All of them say things like, "do you actually think someone is going to take MY gun and use it against ME?" They usually follow it up with something patronizing about when the shit hits the fan (and they fully expect that day to come), I can come hide in their basement or something like that.

I'm sort of realizing I have some arrogant pricks for friends. But hey, they're my arrogant pricks...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
There was also a shooting at a Beech Grove park, just up from Greenwood. 1 was killed, 3 wounded, shooter(s) got away. There were two or three in the car according to witnesses. A vigil was taking place. EMS crews were delayed getting to the park because they were already responding to the mall.
 
That’s the conundrum. Less guns in that moment equals more victims. It hurts me to say and imply what that means. Plus…anyone making arguments about this deterring insane people is just dumb. I’ll take a legal trigger happy guy over nothing at all at this point. Sad to say.
I don't think anyone is saying gun laws will deter insane people once they have have a gun. I think most people are in favor of making it infinitely harder for an insane person to get a gun though.

There seems to be this large scale of accessibility that needs adjusted. No one can buy things like a rocket launcher or a howitzer tank for personal use, that's the high mark. The low mark is that most anyone can purchase the types of guns commonly used in mass shootings.

The thing we collectively need to find common ground on is how do we raise that low mark so people who shouldn't have guns don't have them. No one is suggesting that once an insane person has a gun and is intent to use it that their own personal Jiminy Cricket is going to kick in because of a new law proposed/enacted.
 
Should be taught in places you would dispute. Used to be taught at home and school but that would be to easy and shot down. See the problem with guys like me is I’m a conundrum to you. I’m the middle guy who you cant grasp. You are looking for an argument from me. An argument I don’t fit. You have no idea what an average Joe looks like. You also assume none of us have been through safety courses. Guess what? Most of us do.
Victor, one of the problems with a forum such as this one is that we don't see each other as a conundrum. Instead we pin a label on each other without hesitation.

Furthermore, once labeled for a stance on one issue, you will have a hard time shedding the label. Once a lefty or righty, always a lefty or righty even though you may not deserve this label across the board on all issues. Also once you disagree with someone, you can end up in their doghouse forever.

Finally, if you like a particular candidate and mention it, you will carry that person's party label forever.

Victor, getting back to you, by sounding reasonable you do run the risk of being a Cooler Conundrum.
 
I don't think anyone is saying gun laws will deter insane people once they have have a gun. I think most people are in favor of making it infinitely harder for an insane person to get a gun though.

There seems to be this large scale of accessibility that needs adjusted. No one can buy things like a rocket launcher or a howitzer tank for personal use, that's the high mark. The low mark is that most anyone can purchase the types of guns commonly used in mass shootings.

The thing we collectively need to find common ground on is how do we raise that low mark so people who shouldn't have guns don't have them. No one is suggesting that once an insane person has a gun and is intent to use it that their own personal Jiminy Cricket is going to kick in because of a new law proposed/enacted.
I agree mostly but there are people who are people who think stricter is better in all instances. The other problem is every proposed laws will use the same framework we have right now. Until that’s fixed no new law will be enforced correctly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
Victor, one of the problems with a forum such as this one is that we don't see each other as a conundrum. Instead we pin a label on each other without hesitation.

Furthermore, once labeled for a stance on one issue, you will have a hard time shedding the label. Once a lefty or righty, always a lefty or righty even though you may not deserve this label across the board on all issues. Also once you disagree with someone, you can end up in their doghouse forever.

Finally, if you like a particular candidate and mention it, you will carry that person's party label forever.

Victor, getting back to you, by sounding reasonable you do run the risk of being a Cooler Conundrum.
I’m ok with that. I’ve learned to argue until that argument isn’t heard. It’s close to that.
 
That’s a moment in time. Cops rushing in to the scene can arrive to see two gunmen. What’s to stop them from fixating on the “good guy?”
You throw the gun down and put your hands in the air.

The shooters probably not gonna do that. If he does, all the better.

If the cops shoot you then, they’re murdering you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT