ADVERTISEMENT

Romeo's stock continues to fall.

Everyone remember how we developed/treated Romeo and Vonleh the next time you think it’s in a 5 star’s best interest to come here. Unfortunately neither will ever have the opportunity to play in the NCAAT. Future recruits will notice.

And then go remember Cody Zeller and Yogi Ferrell.
 
I'd like to know who are all these potential draftees are that going to come in and play so many minutes after Zion and Morant. Morant dominated the OVC. I'm sure there will be a sleeper here or there. Good luck to the NBA in picking the right one. I'm sure the Spurs would love to have romeo.

Dejounte Murray of the spurs played predominately in the G-League in his rookie year as a late 1st round pick. In his 2nd year, he became the youngest player to be named to the NBA all defense team earnng 2nd year honors. I think it a myth that players lack the opportunities to develop their games in the NBA. This year Murray, tore his ACL and missed the season. Guess what. Derrick White another rookie guard 1st rounder followed Murray's path. He led the Spurs G-League team to the title last year playing well past april. He is also having a fine 2nd year playing with the NBA spurs.

Donovan mitchell shot 25% as a Frosh playing slight over half the minutes and taking slighty more than half the 3 pointers Romeo took. Nobody really payed attention to him. Romeo draws a lot of defensive attention. Mitchell came back his soph year and shot %35 from the arc.

I hope romeo returns. Morant, mitchell, and Culver make a good case for Romeo returning. Players like Murray and white makes a good case for him leaving. It's really about how hard Romeo works at his game not as much where he does it. I think in the NBA he can make money and probably get up to NBA speed quicker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: travlinhoosier
I don't know about that. If he comes out he'll get his shot. NBA has specialists. My guess is if he is coachable and works hard, he will be able to play a role from the start. I know the experts here say Romeo doesn't play D but IMO, his measurables indicate otherwise. He has elite lateral movement and length for a wing defender. His offense is more polished than OG who has played 20 minutes game off the bench for one of the better teams in the league since he joined them. He may not be a better defender than OG right away but could contribute to an NBA rotation. He will have 5 months of non stop basketball to work on his game and specifically 2-3 months after the NBA summer league to work on a specialty for whatever team drafts him..

What is his specialty?
 
ya, because archie has a long history..of...missing...the...tourney?

you guys are really confusing me. your f******* meltdowns are 1 to 2 years too soon and you know it.

but maybe your getting paid per tear.,,,

What kind of history does he have then? Was it better than Billy Gilliespie? Are the players IU has on their roster good enough to make the tournament two years in a roll? What would be obvious enough for you? not passing sweet 16 with two top 5 NBA lottery picks? What would UK, UNC or any other "elite" schools do under the same circumstances?
 
What kind of history does he have then? Was it better than Billy Gilliespie? Are the players IU has on their roster good enough to make the tournament two years in a roll? What would be obvious enough for you? not passing sweet 16 with two top 5 NBA lottery picks? What would UK, UNC or any other "elite" schools do under the same circumstances?

3 years ago we were NIT with more talent than Miller's first team. so, that didn't surprise. this year surprised me.

took miller 2 years at Dayton to get them on track for 4 ncaa trips in a row.

please name all the other times -- besides that one time UK fired the drunk Gillespie -- that an elite school cut bait after 2 years

you guys aren't wrong to be be pissed but the doom and gloom prognoses is more tied to emotional baggage and 25 years of bad self-esteem than IU's basketball season. jesus...
 
How Archie and the IU staff improve Romeo this year?

Romeo may have his ‘stock falling’ - and realize better get out of the mess at IU while he still is 1st round projected.
What makes anyone assume Archie will improve any of Romeo’s skills, or team status in tourney etc, by staying another year.

I think Romeo will be just fine, start his rookie deal asap, amd cash in on 2nd and 3rd contracts at a younger age.

‘This season sucked, next year looks to be worse. I didn’t improve on any individual skill w the work of this coaching staff...I should spend another year here!’ said no first round draft pick ever.
 
3 years ago we were NIT with more talent than Miller's first team. so, that didn't surprise. this year surprised me.

took miller 2 years at Dayton to get them on track for 4 ncaa trips in a row.

please name all the other times -- besides that one time UK fired the drunk Gillespie -- that an elite school cut bait after 2 years

you guys aren't wrong to be be pissed but the doom and gloom prognoses is more tied to emotional baggage and 25 years of bad self-esteem than IU's basketball season. jesus...

The only one I can think of that’s even close is UNC firing Matt Doherty, but that was after three seasons, to get Roy Williams. I can’t think of any other examples of a major program firing a coach after two years other than UK. UK also had the “he’s a drunk with poor behavior” excuse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hondo314
Seems I remember Romeo making a statement once that he wasn't necessarily a OAD, that if he really enjoyed the college experience and his situation, he might stay for a couple of years. Of course, this year didn't quite go as ANYONE had planned. Maybe he doesn't want to go out this way, maybe he is ready to hit the road running, who knows except Romeo and possibly his family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: travlinhoosier
He was IU's top scorer as a freshman. We didn't provide much help for him. Romeo was not the problem; green & smith not consistently contributing and DD, Race, and Hunter injuries were the factors that sent us to the NIT. We didn't get what we needed from others to win a few more. Langford was pretty darn good.[/QU
Thanks for your much needed clarification!
 
Seems I remember Romeo making a statement once that he wasn't necessarily a OAD, that if he really enjoyed the college experience and his situation, he might stay for a couple of years. Of course, this year didn't quite go as ANYONE had planned. Maybe he doesn't want to go out this way, maybe he is ready to hit the road running, who knows except Romeo and possibly his family.

Seems like all the kids say that about college. Hell, Josh Smith was saying IU was “still in the picture” until about a month or two before the draft.

One of the latest mock drafts I saw had him at #14, so still a lottery pick.
 
Romeo had one of the best Freshman seasons in IU history. When compared against his peers in the 2018 recruiting class, he performed exactly how you would expect based on his ranking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snarlcakes
What is his specialty?

IMO, his lateral movement is elite and he has length that the NBA scouts like. I could see him get minutes off the bench just because of his defense. I guess the consensus is he just goes through the motions and doesn't play hard and never will. If he doesn't work hard at succeeding, then I agree. He just doesn't seem like a me kid or one who won't listen to what he needs to work on. NBA scouts will get close up looks and interviews with him in the draft camps.
 
Yeah, but the non physical stuff matters too. There are a ton of guys with those same attributes who wash out every year. There is a big mental component to being successful at that level that is more than just natural ability. That is where there are question marks for me with Langford.

I look at it like this, Eric Gordon was the type of player on the court who wanted to stomp a mud hole in you and if you tried to get up, he would stomp you some more. Cody Zeller had fight in him. I don't see any fight in Romeo, at least he did not show it for me enough this year. He seemed to shrink from tough play and tough situations. He will probably be one and done but he is the least prepared one and done that I have seen come through here lately.

So if he's a giant head case it makes MORE sense to leave now. Go before you get found out.

He's not ready. None of these guys outside of the top 1 or 2 are ready.
 
IMO, his lateral movement is elite and he has length that the NBA scouts like. I could see him get minutes off the bench just because of his defense. I guess the consensus is he just goes through the motions and doesn't play hard and never will. If he doesn't work hard at succeeding, then I agree. He just doesn't seem like a me kid or one who won't listen to what he needs to work on. NBA scouts will get close up looks and interviews with him in the draft camps.

The big question is will he hold off on hiring an agent.
 
How Archie and the IU staff improve Romeo this year?

Romeo may have his ‘stock falling’ - and realize better get out of the mess at IU while he still is 1st round projected.
What makes anyone assume Archie will improve any of Romeo’s skills, or team status in tourney etc, by staying another year.

I think Romeo will be just fine, start his rookie deal asap, amd cash in on 2nd and 3rd contracts at a younger age.

‘This season sucked, next year looks to be worse. I didn’t improve on any individual skill w the work of this coaching staff...I should spend another year here!’ said no first round draft pick ever.

love how you add your little drama stylings ...ya, romeos is jumping off this runaway train OR more likely he's going pro because that was always his intent

and yes -- the development of one players says all you need to know about every player that will ever play for a coach. P.S. Morgan says hi.

for the millionth time, Archie may turn out to be a bust but it will have nothing to do with your truly shitty analysis.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MrBing
So if he's a giant head case it makes MORE sense to leave now. Go before you get found out.

He's not ready. None of these guys outside of the top 1 or 2 are ready.

Not saying that either. I have already said if he is a lottery pick he should go. If he is not a guaranteed one though I think he should stay.

I think Langford has had things come easy w.r.t. basketball for a good deal of his life. I think that this is really some of the first "adversity" he has really faced in any great measure. I think he could respond to that and improve draft stock next year if he is not going to be a lottery pick.
 
Yeah, but the non physical stuff matters too. There are a ton of guys with those same attributes who wash out every year. There is a big mental component to being successful at that level that is more than just natural ability. That is where there are question marks for me with Langford.

I look at it like this, Eric Gordon was the type of player on the court who wanted to stomp a mud hole in you and if you tried to get up, he would stomp you some more. Cody Zeller had fight in him. I don't see any fight in Romeo, at least he did not show it for me enough this year. He seemed to shrink from tough play and tough situations. He will probably be one and done but he is the least prepared one and done that I have seen come through here lately.
Yes, Gordon is a perfect comparison.
 
It is seemingly dropping like a lead balloon. Perhaps someone should tell him that he would be better off staying at IU, improving his game, getting an education and enjoying the college experience. But there is no chance though and we all know it.
nba-draft-big-board-2019-zion-williamson-ja-morant-rj-barrett-march-madness.html
He is not coming back period.
 
He's not ready. None of these guys outside of the top 1 or 2 are ready.

Morant, Barrett, Williamson, Hachimura, are all ready to play big minutes, and most of the rest of the lottery will play significant minutes as well.

So take your tired cliche somewhere else.
 
love how you add your little drama stylings ...ya, romeos is jumping off this runaway train OR more likely he's going pro because that was always his intent

and yes -- the development of one players says all you need to know every every player that will ever play for a coach. P.S. Morgan says hi.

for the millionth time, Archie may turn out to be a bust but it will have nothing to do with your truly shitty analysis.
Idk that Morgan necessarily improved on any skill...however he was used much more and much differently.
I’d say the previous staff worked on Morgan’s ability to shoot and handle the ball.

Morgan scored well the last 2 seasons. Morgan was given many opportunities to score w Archie and staff....

So maybe he improved skills, or maybe he was sort of like Tom Prichard’s first season when he was force fed the ball inside.
 
IMO, his lateral movement is elite and he has length that the NBA scouts like. I could see him get minutes off the bench just because of his defense. I guess the consensus is he just goes through the motions and doesn't play hard and never will. If he doesn't work hard at succeeding, then I agree. He just doesn't seem like a me kid or one who won't listen to what he needs to work on. NBA scouts will get close up looks and interviews with him in the draft camps.

IMO, I think his lateral quickness is above average for a 6’6” college player, but is not at an elite level.

IMO, to have success in the League, you must be have one truly elite attribute . It could be shooting, passing, rebounding, defending, size, ball-handling, etc. I think Romeo can be good at a lot of things, but does not have a talent that will set him above a plethora of 6’5” or 6’6” shooting guards competing for a long term position in the NBA.

I think he has the potential to work on his aggressiveness, shooting, ball-handling and play-making skills, but they are not near NBA levels at this time.

He will probably spend some time in the G league next year and his ability to improve on his overall game will be the determining factor in his NBA career. He seems like a good kid and I hope he has success.
 
Idk that Morgan necessarily improved on any skill...however he was used much more and much differently.
I’d say the previous staff worked on Morgan’s ability to shoot and handle the ball.

Morgan scored well the last 2 seasons. Morgan was given many opportunities to score w Archie and staff....

So maybe he improved skills, or maybe he was sort of like Tom Prichard’s first season when he was force fed the ball inside.

i think pinpointing development is tricky. easier to do with more years and data to gather from.

langford's year may or may not scare other oads off but it seems like there are just too many variables. idk
 
  • Like
Reactions: cryano
I can't imagine the NBA's feedback machine recommending Romeo stay and develop at IU. They'll take him in round one. If he stays it'll be because he wants to. I'm betting he goes but I hope he returns.
 
Lol....so bored with inferior competition in practice that he was showing what he really was by scoring 40 points a game in Big Ten play. Yeah...right.
Bored by coaching, game plan, lack of success, lack of improvement in individual skill...not what he thought he was coming into...
 
Sweet 16 rings!

Oh, ok... cause I thought you said, "Everyone remember how we developed/treated Romeo and Vonleh the next time you think it’s in a 5 star’s best interest to come here. Unfortunately neither will ever have the opportunity to play in the NCAAT. Future recruits will notice."

So I myself thought, Yogi and Zeller both are on NBA rosters, both made as you said the S16 (which means they were in the NCAAT) and both are beloved around these parts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TommyCracker
Oh, ok... cause I thought you said, "Everyone remember how we developed/treated Romeo and Vonleh the next time you think it’s in a 5 star’s best interest to come here. Unfortunately neither will ever have the opportunity to play in the NCAAT. Future recruits will notice."

So I myself thought, Yogi and Zeller both are on NBA rosters, both made as you said the S16 (which means they were in the NCAAT) and both are beloved around these parts.
So your pitch would be “come here and you have a 50% chance of making the tournament and 50% chance of being loved once you’re gone?”

You think that would beat out the likes of Duke, UK, Kansas, etc?
 
Here's an article from Forbes looking at last years draft and the projected salaries.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonb...round-rookie-salary-projections/#700da3d0642d

Going top 5 versus something like 20th makes a significant difference, though even the last guy in the first round will sign a guaranteed contract worth a few million bucks, so hard to pass that up I would think. Only chance as I see it is that he gets NBA feedback and they tell him a proven jumper could vault him from mid-first this year to high lottery next year. More likely though the scouts figure he can develop the shot (his form looks pure to my untrained eye) and it doesn't make a huge difference.

I'd guess then the question would be the strength of this year's class versus next. I have heard next year projected to be weaker, but those things change.

Even assuming a ten year career (and there's no guarantee of a ten year career by any means)...I wouldn't want to pass up a year's earning potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cryano
Thank goodness the old Barkley days of the NBA are completely gone. “It goes inside, back it in, back it in, back it in, back it in, shoot”. Lillard was burying step back 35 footers last night. Bird started changing the old game and Steph Curry banished it completely.

Watching Steph Curry play it is hard to believe he wasn’t born and bred in Indiana (he was short on his shots last night though). He plays with an intensity you don’t often see.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT