I don't think it's inconceivable at all. I still think it's likely as far as the Russia stuff goes. Obstruction of Justice is most likely at this point. Perjury too, if Trump is interviewed under oath - he can't stop himself from lying about anything.
Welcome back...As you say, Trump is farcically unfit. I would say he is more Caligula than Chance the Gardner. As a matter of historical accuracy perhaps that treats Caligula unfairly. An unfortunate minority of the American electorate went postal and elected Trump. The GOP has a clear path back to sanity by removing him and installing Pence. The Democrats have a duty to help them do this. We shouldn't forget that we are here because of a gross abrogation of duty by the Republicans who made it possible for Trump to get elected in the first place.
Obviously he's farcically unfit
Sure I would. To the same extent the Rs here accepted Comey's July decision on Hillary.
Be hard for me to imagine direct collusion between the campaign and the Ruskies, but all the ancillary stuff with Flynn and the pressure on Comey and the firing and so on... that's where the trouble is. That's where obstruction and perjury come into play. Even without a smoking gun, there's the whole failure to "faithfully execute" thing. Impeachment is a totally political process. Couching things in legal terms is the norm, but the law actually doesn't apply.
Sure I would. To the same extent the Rs here accepted Comey's July decision on Hillary.
Be hard for me to imagine direct collusion between the campaign and the Ruskies, but all the ancillary stuff with Flynn and the pressure on Comey and the firing and so on... that's where the trouble is. That's where obstruction and perjury come into play. Even without a smoking gun, there's the whole failure to "faithfully execute" thing. Impeachment is a totally political process. Couching things in legal terms is the norm, but the law actually doesn't apply.
Mueller isn't investigating for an impeachment, he's investigating for possible, actual, crimes.Sure I would. To the same extent the Rs here accepted Comey's July decision on Hillary.
Be hard for me to imagine direct collusion between the campaign and the Ruskies, but all the ancillary stuff with Flynn and the pressure on Comey and the firing and so on... that's where the trouble is. That's where obstruction and perjury come into play. Even without a smoking gun, there's the whole failure to "faithfully execute" thing. Impeachment is a totally political process. Couching things in legal terms is the norm, but the law actually doesn't apply.
You are correct. But much of the discussion is about what he might find could lead to impeachment.
Impeachment and removal from office are not the same thing. Clinton was impeached.
Sure I would. To the same extent the Rs here accepted Comey's July decision on Hillary.
Be hard for me to imagine direct collusion between the campaign and the Ruskies, but all the ancillary stuff with Flynn and the pressure on Comey and the firing and so on... that's where the trouble is. That's where obstruction and perjury come into play. Even without a smoking gun, there's the whole failure to "faithfully execute" thing. Impeachment is a totally political process. Couching things in legal terms is the norm, but the law actually doesn't apply.
You're dead wrong. It's entirely about Trump. I couldn't care less that Hillary is not the POTUS.
Amazing how when the shoe is in the other foot, the standard is raised.
Fine. Except I'd love for you to explain to me what makes me a leftist. Not that there's anything wrong with being a leftist.
No, Ranger is representative on this point. This has nothing to do with Hillary.
More like Commodus...which was when Gibbons pegged the beginning of "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodus
No. Hillary was just the candidate who happened to lose to Trump. The left's response to Trump is entirely about Trump. That's why it is consistent across all parts of the left, including those parts that didn't like Hillary. If your supposition were true, Berniecrats, socialists and anarchists wouldn't be walking hand in hand with the Hillarycrats.This has everything to do with Hillary.
The largest march in the history of the United States was the Women's March on Washington. People marched in every state and every city. This was the Hillary supporters response to Trump. The "Resist!" slogan originated there, Hillary joined the resistance as did millions of others.
Except it's completely wrong. It has nothing to do with butthurt over Hillary. Many of us held our noses and voted for since many of were in key battleground states.
<sigh> My post that you responded to explicitly said that with regards to impeachment, "crime" or any other legal term is irrelevant, even if no "smoking gun" is found.
I couldn't care less, and nor do most reasonable people, about the resist movement. The Resist Movement isn't going to drive this shameful carnival barker out of office, patriots in the form of adult lawyers will.This has everything to do with Hillary.
The largest march in the history of the United States was the Women's March on Washington. People marched in every state and every city. This was the Hillary supporters response to Trump. The "Resist!" slogan originated there, Hillary joined the resistance as did millions of others.
There is one poster here who does insist on turning every thread about Trump into a rant about Hillary or Obama. Methinks he is simply projecting here.
