I like Otzelberger. I’ve watched his team play a few games and am impressed especially against Houston down his top 2 scorers.
Reality check for the anti-Beard folks…
- Thread starter gator mcCluskey
- Start date
Stadiums and basketball venues are never ranked on their structural assets. All rankings are based off of the program success. Assembly Hall gets so much love because of the winning that happened there. Structurally and sight lines, it stinks.
Would also never pass code today. Seating bank angle is far too steep, you need Frau Blücher there as an usher to warn you that the staircase can be treacherous.
If you say so. Iu has never won at football. Ever. That is serious pressure to put on a new AD if true.
And you think IU is getting to that? Iu had a great year but benefited from a really weak schedule. I am not sold they will stay high in the big ten. Portal helped big time but you have to develop guys in football. That’s next step for Cig.
Well, if you look at history, there are teams like Oregon who were abysmal in football for decades. They committed to it and made an investment in it.
I get that you are the Notre Dame football / IU basketball guy on the board. I have a buddy who is this profile as well. You want it to be how it has always has been but I can tell you that unless you have been living in a cave, the entire landscape of college athletics is being driven by football. You have to put max effort into it or you are sunk.
The top-25 of basketball is littered with schools who have long been identified as “football schools,” so it would seem that if you can get good coaching in place, it’s a much easier build.
IU fans are actually starved for a good football program….and they will turn out (just like the back half of last year) when they have a competent coach and they put a product on the field that is worth watching.
Were you at Memorial Stadium this season?
I can tell you that the atmosphere in there was 10x better than any of the basketball games in SSAH I’ve seen these past 4 years.
They should have demolished SSAH and built a brand new arena. Yeah, it may have hurt fans egos and nostalgia but recruits like new shiny things, 2nd only to NIL money.
It’s a no brainer that if you want to start fast, you use the portal. You don’t get to the development stage of players relying on young, inexperienced guys in your first two years. And, who’s to say that you ever get to a full development of a roster anymore? You get veteran guys leaving all the time for other schools. Look at your own football team: ND just had two veteran OL guys who were going to be starters next year bail for other schools.
They weren’t starters. Injuries to other players made them starters. Those players will be back.
Has. Nothing to do with being a ND fan. I’m saying tradition still matters, yes money stirs the drink but IU is in Michigan, ND, OSU back yard. Recruiting is going to be hard to best those teams. We will see if this success can be sustained or not. I don’t think it will, facilities need upgrades big time. Recruiting needs upgrades big time. Oregon is also not a great example, Oregon is Nike. When Nike got cool, Oregon got cool. Also they have little competition in west coast recruiting. USC and Washington.
Different types of pressure.
I understand what you are saying, but I’m sure you wouldn’t think there is no pressure to make a successful BB hire because financially it is sitting “squarely in the passenger seat”.
Sure, football drives revenue in college sports.
But, historically basketball has been a crown jewel of IU sports for the fans, for national recognition and for driving donor money. Football has been mostly an afterthought.
(Hopefully the Cig hire is as good as everyone believes it was, and going forward the above paragraph has been blown apart).
Cignetti has said several times he wants to shift more to high school recruiting. However, that takes time because the staff have to build relationships with the HS programs. Therefore, we're more portal heavy early on. He's only been here 15 months.
IU is making a serious push to get out of the bottom of the conference to at least be mid-pack. That could be worth ten of millions to IU's athletic dept, which is also going to be good for basketball.
IU is making a serious push to get out of the bottom of the conference to at least be mid-pack. That could be worth ten of millions to IU's athletic dept, which is also going to be good for basketball.
Disagree and yes I went to the PU game. Assembly is still a destination game for people. Memorial isn’t.
That’s not true, neither were going to start and that’s why they left. Coogan who transferred to IU was the backup center and took over when Craig tore his ACL in week 4 or 5.
Spindler was the swing guy and was going to be 7th guy in the OL scheme of things. Coogan 6th man.
Zzzzzzzzzzz. We generally aren't recruiting against those huge programs. Facilities are fine and more upgrades are coming, recruiting is fine and improving... this stuff doesn't happen overnight.
Sorry dude, IU likes football now. IUFB moving from bottom of the B1G to anywhere in the middle of the conference is huge for IU athletics' financials. IUBB is part of IU athletics and will benefit.
Liking IU's basketball team but not the rest of IU is... quite the conflict.
Don’t take having a discussion about IU football as me not “liking” IU football. I’m saying IU has much better chance of being a basketball power than football. You say you aren’t recruiting against those guys in football, well it is because they crab the top talent. You don’t think IU needs to recruit against those guys to beat them or be in that conversation as a program? Come on man.
Last season IU benefited from the schedule. Would we even be having this discussion if IU had played PU schedule last year?
PU: played ND, OSU, PsU, Oregon, Illinois
I'll speculate that it has to do with where your loyalties lie. The Nebraska game at IU, in terms of environment, was much more exciting than the dozens of ND games I've been to. The level of excitement for that game, for Washington, for Michigan beats everything I've experienced at SSAH in the last five years.
There's definitely more history at SSAH, nobody disputes that. It's not a fan friendly venue. I don't see how anyone can dispute that either.
Assembly is like Phog Allen, ND stadium, Camden, Madison Square, Rose bowl, Wrigly, Fenway.
People want to go to say they saw a game there. Memorial isn’t that place. Did you got to the ND/IU game? I did and waaaay different than IU game day atmosphere.
I'm with you on AH. I think a good architect could incorporate the banners and vertical feel, but modernize the arena and improve the views for the upper level seats.
Keep the same building but makes adjustments like Fenway, Wrigley, ND stadium have done. Don’t tear down the history.
I haven’t been there for years but always thought that as a place to watch a basketball game the arena in zChampaign was better. I haven’t been to any others in Big10, just IU and UI.
No shit. Another strawman what a surprise.
IUFB is not going to be OSU, UM, or ND anytime soon, likely never. I literally said IU is trying to move out from the bottom of the conference in football to mid-conference, and that would be awesome because it's a huge improvement and it changes everything with our athletic dept., more than anything bball can do. IU fans are excited about this
It's pretty clear you don't follow IUFB, you're citing the lazy schedule narrative and not how IU won or the metrics. If IU had played PU's schedule last year the improvement would still be very noticeable. It's all hypothetical, but we would have had a decent chance to beat Illinois and PSU, and ND at home who knows. IU is familiar with tough schedules, we played OSU, UM, and PSU every year for a decade, and many of those years MSU was pretty good too.
It's such a weird conflict to "like" Indiana bball and not care about the rest of Indiana University.
You are putting the words not liking IU football in my mouth. I will cheer them on also. I’m just speaking to your comments about the football program. I would say IU athletic department is better than Iowa and Wisconsin. Two mid tier football programs for a long time.
Last edited:
Iowa brings in around $15-20M more revenue per year than IU, that's a lot. We aren't even close to Wisconsin, they have about $50M more (33%) annual revenue than IU and in the last 20 years have beat us in football and bball consistently.
That's the problem. The places you're referring to are all outdoors which gives you way more options than someplace like SSAH. While not an architect myself, I have a hard time seeing how you can make SSAH more fan friendly. Obstructed views , the "tunnel effect " rows 36 and up, or so the Memorial Stadium presents a lot more opportunities to enhance, expand, modernize.
This has, I guess really gone off the rails. The original point, Scott did not have the latitude to f up the football hire. The days of football being something to tide us over until bball season aren't part of the plan anymore.
Edit: I'll be nice and answer this. IU is higher than KU (worse media rights) and a bit above PU. UConn is not applicable with their football setup and Duke is similar to IU.
Remember, my point is the football hire was vital for IU athletics' financial future and not some low pressure no one cares hire.
Last edited:
I was using them as examples of our football program not impacting basketball success
I can tell, another random argument. I never said FB had to be good for BB to be good. I said FB is the key the AD's financial success, which is why the FB hire was important. And the more $ the AD brings in, the more we can spend on BB, which is a nice bonus.
Similar threads
