So, you do you read that as no vaccines should be taken? If no vaccine is effective, why take it, dumbass?No vaccine is completely safe and effective. Big difference dumbass.
You also didn't answer all my questions.
So, you do you read that as no vaccines should be taken? If no vaccine is effective, why take it, dumbass?No vaccine is completely safe and effective. Big difference dumbass.
Did I say that? No. Did RFKjr? No.So, you do you read that as no vaccines should be taken? If no vaccine is effective, why take it, dumbass?
No, he did say that NO vaccine was SAFE and EFFECTIVE. It's been linked here several times. You refuse to acknowledge it. I do think you are a liar - and a dishonorable POS. Same thing, I guess.Did I say that? No. Did RFKjr? No.
You’re either a blatant liar or dumber than a box of rocks. Lose, lose.
Dude, it's been linked here SEVERAL times by more than one person. Jesus, you're impossible. It's even in this thread. WTF is wrong with you? That's a serious question by the way.You’re wrong. Something you are very used to. Show me the clip of him saying no vaccine was safe and effective. You won’t, because he didn’t.
My 7-month old granddaughter is in the vax regimen....I am very conflicted.What are your thoughts on vaccinations for children? RFK Jr. & Co. appears to be pushing "federal drug regulators to revoke approval for the polio and hepatitis B vaccines and block distribution of 13 other critical vaccines."
If you had the choice, would you choose not to have your child or grandchildren given the required or recommended vaccinations? Like MMR and polio vaccines? Do you agree with RFK Jr. and would you trust his "research" and findings?
I'm just curious.
RFK Jr key adviser petitioned regulators to revoke approval of polio vaccine
Aaron Siri is helping Trump’s health secretary pick to select top jobs despite long history of attacking vaccineswww.theguardian.com
The nerve of this guy, changing his opinion, possibly even from learning something….His word, WHEN?
His word now is different than his word a few months ago, his word last year, the year before, the year before that, etc.
You’re DEAD WRONG on this. He can be both.Did I say that? No. Did RFKjr? No.
You’re either a blatant liar or dumber than a box of rocks. Lose, lose.
Because if 1 in a million has a bad reaction, those are pretty good odds. 1 in 2…not so much. Quit being dumb.
The mfkr is a blatant liar.Did I say that? No. Did RFKjr? No.
You’re either a blatant liar or dumber than a box of rocks. Lose, lose.
Because if 1 in a million has a bad reaction, those are pretty good odds. 1 in 2…not so much. Quit being dumb.
That's precisely what WE ARE SAYING.No vaccine is completely safe and effective. Big difference dumbass.
I think you’re being too literal with the safe and effective. I suspect he means that it’s harmless. That they are not harmless. You know they operate in the no fault world for adverse outcomes. There’s a national compensation fund. He takes a critical eye to things. Maybe there’s a way to make them even safer. Maybe there should be liability. Maybe goose stepping isn’t always best. We lost a lot of faith in cdc nih etc. let’s revisit how we operate. Go jrYou're amazingly invested in defending RFK Jr. Why? What has he done for you? Why do you think he's such a great pick? He's not even a Republican and he was a 2004 conspiracy theorist who claimed GWB only won due to voter fraud in Ohio. His own words about vaccines, which were linked in this thread (again), show that he's anti-vax at worst and a vaccine skeptic at bet. He's definitively said that no vaccine was safe AND effective. What do you make of that statement? Now that he knows he may have to go through a confirmation hearing he's changed his tune a bit because no anti-vax person is likely to be confirmed for Secretary of HHS. Why do you completely buy his newer statements and completely disregard his original statements? Was he lying then or is he lying now?
Could be, but I’m a grammar guy. I took his comments literally.I think you’re being too literal with the safe and effective. I suspect he means that it’s harmless. That they are not harmless. You know they operate in the no fault world for adverse outcomes. There’s a national compensation fund. He takes a critical eye to things. Maybe there’s a way to make them even safer. Maybe there should be liability. Maybe goose stepping isn’t always best. We lost a lot of faith in cdc nih etc. let’s revisit how we operate. Go jr
He’s an enviro trial lawyer. He’s relied on experts his entire professional life. I doubt he’s going rogue. The recalcitrance to even questioning our wasteful, bloated, failing gov is lost on meCould be, but I’m a grammar guy. I took his comments literally.
God is good. He was presenting your daughter an opportunity to quit soccer.Mine had to for soccer. She has three heads now but I'm not even sure it's related to the vax.
That's using Google AND Bing.“heavy research”
🤣🤣🤣
You hit your head really hard?Yes. But things have changed for me.
Is there some type of money grab angle here?
Ignored along with the other good advice and counsel given.God is good. He was presenting your daughter an opportunity to quit soccer.