ADVERTISEMENT

Pubs Prove Voter Fraud in Michigan

Speaking of grifters , Pelosi's husband got a DUI last night. There are no easier targets than idiots that keep voting for these ancient broken down Democrats

Do you know what a grifter is? Hint: Someone getting a dui doesn't even qualify them as a grifter. Plus, did her husband run for office? I was unaware.
 
Grifters: Trump, Trump Children, Bo Biden, Pelosi
Pedophiles: Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and Trump
Let’s make sure all know all sins are bi-partisan so we maybe all can track facts- but I understand the bulk in the coolers are dope smokers and blindly partisan like Lucy/Danc etc
I’ll confess to being chicken shit to call out those two but both have proven to be so partisan and so salivating for a Trump dictatorship I have them both on ignore.
Again I’m Lincoln Project- a Republican who stands in direct opposition to Trump. I’m neither racist or want deficit spending and I appreciate the American democracy
 
Last edited:
The beginning.

 
The beginning.

Fine her ($150,000), and throw her and her less than 12 ballots in jail for 2 years.

Then we can move on to finding the other 587,730 people who stole the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Too much to cite on my phone. Worth reading the article. Pubs doing Pubs thangs.

In the latest update they've lost their bid to have a court reinstate their candidacy. They can appeal to the MI Supreme Court, but I don't see the SC bailing them out. Beyond ironic in light of all the Big Lie BS being spread by Trump and his minions...

 
Speaking of grifters , Pelosi's husband got a DUI last night. There are no easier targets than idiots that keep voting for these ancient broken down Democrats
Did you personally vote for Pelosi's husband for something?

Maybe you don't remember.
 
The beginning.

You do realize this was only the Dem Primary, right? Using your logic, Trump has already accused other Pubs of voter fraud in both GA and PA. And since Perdue lost by 50+ points, I'm guessing that "cheating" by Kemp backed Pubs amounted to far more than the 12 ballots this woman was involved with...

In reading the story this wasn't even the Presidential primary, but rather a local city council election. Meanwhile we know that Pubs committed voter fraud in at least CO. GA NV and FL. And the best example you can find in trying to tar Dems is a woman favoring one council candidate over another? We don't even know which candidate she allegedly favored...
 
You do realize this was only the Dem Primary, right? Using your logic, Trump has already accused other Pubs of voter fraud in both GA and PA. And since Perdue lost by 50+ points, I'm guessing that "cheating" by Kemp backed Pubs amounted to far more than the 12 ballots this woman was involved with...

In reading the story this wasn't even the Presidential primary, but rather a local city council election. Meanwhile we know that Pubs committed voter fraud in at least CO. GA NV and FL. And the best example you can find in trying to tar Dems is a woman favoring one council candidate over another? We don't even know which candidate she allegedly favored...
He didn't read the article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cosmickid
I know I have specifically voted against Pelosi’s husband in every presidential election I have voted in…and now I feel vindicated.
Nancy looks pickled. And that husband. 82 out drunk driving. Wow. Couple of rich old drunks living their best lives. Damn.
 


And if you really want to know how they did it watch this great interview with Barnes and D’Souza. It was always about matching the signatures. But I don’t expect libs to watch. You can’t handle truth.

So, if I am getting this right, the issue here is that these 19,000 votes should have been rejected because they were not received by the counting office until after a deadline (USPS failure?), even though they had been postmarked before the election. I mean, I get it, you have rules in place to say that you have to get your ballot in on time, but these are not "fraudulent" votes. You can claim that they should be invalid, but they are still votes that really should have been counted.

Regardless:

Maricopa county results:

Biden: 1,040,774 (50.1%)
Trump: 995,665 (48.1%)

So, assuming averages hold for those 19,000 votes, even if you take the hardline stance that votes received after the November 4th deadline are invalid, this would have netted Trump....380 votes. And before you go with the "Mail-in votes heavily favored Democrats" argument:
Early Mail in Votes:
Democrat: 923,805
Republican: 914,172

So where are the 10,000+ other "fraudulent" votes coming from?
 
I know I have specifically voted against Pelosi’s husband in every presidential election I have voted in…and now I feel vindicated.

unless you have been voting for economic progressives in primaries, and not the national DNC backed candidates or any Pub, you haven't been voting against Pelosi's husband.

while i apologize if i've forgotten someone, seems like the number of posters on this board who have been voting against Pelosi's husband, Dem or Pub, can be counted on 1 finger.
 
Last edited:
Who voted for Pelosi's husband?
He's made a lot of money by being her husband. She is the insider trader lady. Now the truth is many of our elected officials get rich by knowing ahead of the time which laws they are passing which will have certain impacts. So did not vote for Mr. Pelosi, but he doesn't care because he is sitting pretty financially. Why couldn't he get an uber or take a cab? Doesn't he have any friends who could have driven him home? I don't get how rich people drink and drive. They don't have to.
 
He's made a lot of money by being her husband. She is the insider trader lady. Now the truth is many of our elected officials get rich by knowing ahead of the time which laws they are passing which will have certain impacts. So did not vote for Mr. Pelosi, but he doesn't care because he is sitting pretty financially. Why couldn't he get an uber or take a cab? Doesn't he have any friends who could have driven him home? I don't get how rich people drink and drive. They don't have to.
You don’t leave your Porsche at a sketchy Napa winery overnight. You’ll find it the next day on blocks, with all the tires long gone.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mcmurtry66


And if you really want to know how they did it watch this great interview with Barnes and D’Souza. It was always about matching the signatures. But I don’t expect libs to watch. You can’t handle truth.

So you're taking your cues on "election fraud" from convicted felon D'Souza? You do realize HE was convicted of "election fraud", and pardoned by Trump, right?

And speaking of Trump, the primary in PA supposedly turns on the issue of mail in ballots. Trump is coaching Oz to claim that McCormick shouldn't be allowed to count large swaths of his mail in ballots, because of "irregularities". So is McCormick now in on the fiendish Dem plot to "steal the election"?

How many times have you seen 2000 mules? Did it ever strike you as strange that they supposedly have complete video of all of these "mules" voting illegally at multiple sights, but never show any of them voting more than once? Do you just blindly accept the claims that they have video proof of multiple people voting illegally, but never bother to show that proof? And if they have this video proof, surely they must know who these people are. But out of 2000 people they don't list a single name?

Isn't the first thing an investigative reporter does when he has proof of someone's guilt is NAME the guilty party. If you watched the movie and these questions don't come at you like a ton of bricks, you're pretty gullible...
 
Nancy looks pickled. And that husband. 82 out drunk driving. Wow. Couple of rich old drunks living their best lives. Damn.
You can’t go by looks or you’d think Trump was the biggest drunk in the world. And listening to him speak, you’d think the same. But alas, neither he nor Nancy drink.
 


And if you really want to know how they did it watch this great interview with Barnes and D’Souza. It was always about matching the signatures. But I don’t expect libs to watch. You can’t handle truth.

Look it’s 2000 Mules again and its criminal director. Everyone’s favorite source. Lol
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT