lol, nope. There is just trillions of dollars in real estate that is looking for a store of value. I think eventually some of it will flow out of real estate. The future is bright, buddy
Politico: Roe to be overturned per draft opinion
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
Hell no - in addition to being a lib, he's also dumber than hell.
Love our Lt. Governor, though. He's a black conservative.
So why has this been such a plank in the conservative platform for decades? Doesn’t your reasoning above also apply to abortion being legal in every state?
From the data on the 26 nations that have outlawed abortions, most of which are 3rd world backwaters, we can anticipate that the total number of abortions performed will rise after the ban. Secondly, that many will be of the back alley type, Thirdly, that the poorest women will be subjected to the worst of the back alley treatments, with a disproportionate amount of women of color dead or suffering permanent disabilities.
If you really want to LOWER the frequency of abortions, the path is crystal clear. Better access to birth control, better sex education, and better education of women, especially in poorer areas.
Also, access to health care after a child is born.
But who cares about data, and science. That's all a liberal conspiracy by the "gespacho".
Last edited:
Agree. It's no biggie that addicts have to drive to Illinois or Michigan to get their fix.
So you wouldn't mind driving to Kentucky to buy guns?
There’s some pretty clear language on guns in the constitution.
There are already people protesting outside the The Supreme Court. Don’t these people have jobs? Who pay’s these people?
Apples and oranges but no. I only own 2 guns and haven't purchased one in 15 years.
Where in the Constitution does it say you have a right to BUY guns? If we are to read it EXACTLY as written, it says you can own them and it says you can bear them, but EXACTLY as written it says nothing about buying. Nor does it mention ammunition. Nor does it say you have a right to ever discharge a weapon. If you are a literalist, where are you getting buying, firing, or ammunition from in the specific words used?
"
If you really want to LOWER the frequency of abortions, the path is crystal clear. Better access to birth control, better sex education, and better education of women, especially in pooer areas.
But who cares about data, and science. That's all a liberal conspiracy by the "gespacho"."
Data and science? How much more birth control, sex education and "education of women" (whatever that means) do they need to know what makes babies and how to avoid it?
Try to convine women from "pooer areas" to close their legs more often - that's a sure way to reduce abortions.
If we knew which babies were going to grow up to be lawyers, I would support abortion.
2nd Amendment, boss. Constitution "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.".
Supreme Court chief justice directs marshal to investigate leak, calls out 'egregious breach of ... trust'
The Supreme Court issued a response to the report of a draft opinion that, if published, would overturn Roe v. Wade, with Chief Justice John Roberts strongly condemning the leak to the press.
Like almost everyone on the far-right, you're really angry, Murt. Grievance politics has you guys enraged. And 16,000 posts in just three years? That's a staggering number. I can't imagine that leaves much time for ambulance-chasing or anything else for that matter. You need another, healthier outlet. Maybe you and your "stoker" could take up ballroom dancing or something.
Keep me posted. I care, bro.
Actually, I agree with you, in theory. I don't have a problem States being allowed to pass laws relating to making and selling guns, making and selling ammunition, etc.
This just opens the door for some states to make a lot more money and have businesses that do those things.
But along with that, states should not be allowed to require a license to own firearms. Are you willing to go along with that?
Great, more surge pricing from Uber and Lyft.
But yeah, people will definitely put together organizations to make this happen. There needs to be a legislative solution and the Supremes might make it happen sooner rather than later. And in the midst of what looked to be a drubbing in November for the Dems.
I guess you could say the Supremes are back to being apolitical b/c this surely shoots the Pubs in the foot.
one would think this would spawn nonprofits to fill that void. i'm sure they could raise a bunch of dough
Projecting again? I enjoy the board and don't have a boss. What can I say. I'm good at multitasking. Keep chasing Danc's tail...
and laws to criminalize such acts on the part of the nonprofits.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction... in this case often done in ADVANCE of the action
Last edited:
It's hard for simple-minded people to realize some have the ability to multi-task.
I really don't see that going anywhere. I mean I guess a goofy legislature could put them on the books and it'd just be a weird patchwork of some county DAs enforcing and some not.
You're more fun than danc, murt. And you don't lie like he does, except when you claim to be a moderate. But for God's sake, lighten up a little, would ya? You take yourself way too seriously.
Take abortion for instance (sorry to change the topic), the most inhumane approach is to have society foolishly at odds whereas the humane approach is to
Pragmatically focus on minimizing unwanted pregnancies, maximizing healthy outcomes for women and the like. Ironically the inhumane approach puts us at polar odds and the humane approach gives us common ground.
I am told that we should use the exact words in the Constitution and only those words, no interpretation is allowed. Is that not the Federalist Society view? If I am right on that, and I am, where is buying guns, shooting guns, and buying ammunition listed.
Or are we all admitting that one must infer and interpret the words? Some of youu infer ammo is in the Constitution, fair enough. I suspect it is inferred and thus is protected, but I am honest that inferring is there and not just a strict use of only the words that appear.
I've got food being delivered. A conference call i'm going to be jumping on. Champions league will be on in the background, the internet up, and if i were single and had more energy i could get some sexting cookin too. wtf is wrong with him. multitask
Isn't that what you and DANC are doing?
Sounds like people will have to leave the state to have sex to accidentally get pregnant.
It's central to the Texas law, to my understanding.
Anyone who performs an abortion, or aids with the performance of an abortion, can be sued
Yeah i skimmed it a while back. super nutty
