Ok. Then why do I need to talk to women on campus?No. Not sure where you got that from my comment.
Ok. Then why do I need to talk to women on campus?No. Not sure where you got that from my comment.
That was tried in 1861 - 1865.The country needs to be split up into 3 regional groupings for it to be functional again. West, Central and Eastern regions. Like an EU super-grouping.
It's already voting like that.
Has just outgrown its 50 state-federated system. It's all gridlock now. And with no accountability.
It is anachronistic.
Would never work/happen but agree with you there's some marked divisions that are going to be hard to bridge. I don't know if they've always been there and have simply been amplified with media/social media or we're growing apartThe country needs to be split up into 3 regional groupings for it to be functional again. West, Central and Eastern regions. Like an EU super-grouping.
It's already voting like that.
Has just outgrown its 50 state-federated system. It's all gridlock now. And with no accountability.
It is anachronistic.
Sleep on it.Ok. Then why do I need to talk to women on campus?
its a very different world we live in say compared to 150yrs ago.That was tried in 1861 - 1865.
I don't know what BICBW means?
Because half the country can't tell the difference between a man and a woman.Would never work/happen but agree with you there's some marked divisions that are going to be hard to bridge. I don't know if they've always been there and have simply been amplified with media/social media or we're growing apart
Not really different at all in terms of human interaction.its a very different world we live in say compared to 150yrs ago.
Sleep on it.
Ah, because I don't know what a bunch of letters mean, means I never think I'm wrong.Of course you don't. You'd never consider it.
Urban Dictionary: BICBW
But I Could Be Wrong. Used online in forums and chat.www.urbandictionary.com
If this is true, I expect we’ll see some
I believe you are correct. People are already organizing I imagine.If this is true, I expect we’ll see some pretty serious unrest.
Would never work/happen but agree with you there's some marked divisions that are going to be hard to bridge. I don't know if they've always been there and have simply been amplified with media/social media or we're growing apart
Murder the baby and hit the beach. Yessir that’s exactly what women do. And you know desperate women can all certainly afford to hop on a plane. All this will do is lead to back alley abortions again and women will die. It won’t stop abortions .Right. Drive or fly to California, murder the baby, and then hit the beach.
I've always heard stacking and packing used interchangeablyActually, that's called court packing. Stacking would be the better term for what McConnell did.
Leaking this sort of thing is a big scandal.Exclusive: Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft circulated inside the court.www.politico.com
Because that’s what it is to you. Women losing a basic right that has been decided by the courts is “fun” for you. Republicans will lose the women’s vote for years.It’s gonna be fun watching people lose their shit over this, if nothing else.
Abortion is not being outlawed, love. Calm down.Murder the baby and hit the beach. Yessir that’s exactly what women do. And you know desperate women can all certainly afford to hop on a plane. All this will do is lead to back alley abortions again and women will die. It won’t stop abortions .
Exactly just ask the January 6 gang. Didn’t like the election results so committed violence and stormed the capitol. Repugnant. Lawless.Of course. We have become a lawless society. If you don’t get your way, or don’t like a ruling, you riot. Violence is the modern language.
Perhap, you should view it from the unborn child’s perspective. The liberty to live is pretty big.This is the first Supreme Court ruling that I can think of that has ever resulted in less liberty.
Sweetie I know exactly what it is. But do continue to mansplain it, sweetie.Abortion is not being outlawed, love. Calm down.
It’s an embryo .Perhap, you should view it from the unborn child’s perspective. The liberty to live is pretty big.
That makes no sense at all.
Leaking this sort of thing is a big scandal.
Oh did you miss the fact that Mitch refused to vote on Obama’s pick?Good grief. Presidents appoint justices to open seats with consent of the senate. Nobody is stacking the court.
Leaking this sort of thing is a big scandal.
Read the rest of my posts.Oh did you miss the fact that Mitch refused to vote on Obama’s pick?
How many people even have access to the document (barring a hack)? I can't imagine more than a couple dozen. If leaking it is not a crime it should be. Trying to influence this decision would be like trying to overturn an election (tongue only slightly in cheek).
You really are this stupid aren't you?You apparently didn't follow along
When Obama tried, gop said you can't appoint one during an election year.
Low and behold, they allowed Trump to appoint one weeks before the election.
So yes, they stacked the court with their bull shit
Oh it’s quite clear lawmakers could care less what people actually want. Well one party of lawmakers. For example, they could care less that 90% of the public is for more stringent background check for gun laws. They don’t care that a majority of people support a right to choice.Oh, a kid will be poor, so let's kill him.
Great logic.
If you think the majority approve of the 'right to choose', you should be thrilled that the decsion will go to the states, where they can make it law.
Too drunk? Define that vs drunk enough to make bad decisions? I don't really have much feelings one way or the other on this issue but I hate stupid liberals and their dumbass thought process.Well if she got too drunk and became pregnant she was raped. Not that I expect you would care.
You would probably be there holding her hand telling her it was God's Will she became pregnant while drunk raped.
Oh more good stuff. You guys love the hyperbole, don’t you? Love sucking brains out of babies!!!Tell me this. Why should an irresponsible person be able to have the brains sucked out of a baby just because she (or he now, I am told) got too drunk one night, or finds it's an inconvenient time to have a child?
The majority are OK with abortion in the first trimester and then favor increasing restrictions after that and the majority oppose abortion in the third trimester. This is where I am too. Elected Democrats have hurt their position over the years by supporting abortion on demand to the minute before birth in vote after vote on late-term abortion restrictions. That’s not where most Democrats or Americans are. I also think elected Republicans hurt their case when they oppose any and all abortions, even in the first trimester and in the cases of rape and incest.Majority of the land favors a right to choose, but as usual the far right wackos are now in charge.
You all do such a great job supporting kids right up until they're born. Then it's pull yourself up by your bootstraps time.
You’re the ones that don’t care about poor kids once they are born. Vote against every single possible solution and never even attempt to come up with one of your own. Pull yourself up from your bootstraps!Oh, a kid will be poor, so let's kill him.
Great logic.
If you think the majority approve of the 'right to choose', you should be thrilled that the decsion will go to the states, where they can make it law.
Oh more good stuff. You guys love the hyperbole, don’t you? Love sucking brains out of babies!!!
Peaceful??? Bless your heart.Peaceful storming of a building gets you solitary confinement for months without charges.
Oh wait - that's just for Republicans.
Hey guess what? Men can too. And if they did, women wouldn’t need abortions. Novel idea, eh? Or, get this, men could wear a condom!!! And then women wouldn’t need abortions. So just be more responsible and men won’t have to worry one bit about the results.Women can speak for themselves. They can choose to have sex or not. 97% of abortions are a choice, not from rape or incest. Again, women can choose not to have sex.
I'm far from liberal so please stop with the labels. I won't speak for other men, but in my college days more than once I avoided sex with a drunk coed. I don't have a definition of what too drink is, but I knew it when I saw it.Too drunk? Define that vs drunk enough to make bad decisions? I don't really have much feelings one way or the other on this issue but I hate stupid liberals and their dumbass thought process.
The senior justice in the majority assigns the opinion, but doesn't necessarily write it himself. However, as justices are allowed to change their votes, and can eventually choose to not sign off on a particular opinion, what was intended to be the majority opinion when it was assigned may eventually not actually be one. See the Obamacare case, in which the unsigned joint dissent was almost certainly originally the assigned (intended) majority opinion until Roberts changed his mind.I don't think that's necessarily so (BICBW). Granted, it would usually go to the senior Justice, but I don't think that's a hard and fast rule. There's no fvcking way Thomas doesn't vote to overturn Roe.
You know there is a really, really simple way to avoid this being an issue don't you? Doctors have determined what causes pregnancy , you do know this right?You’re the ones that don’t care about poor kids once they are born. Vote against every single possible solution and never even attempt to come up with one of your own. Pull yourself up from your bootstraps!