ADVERTISEMENT

Politico: Roe to be overturned per draft opinion

Really good post. I obviously disagree on the overall topic but you made really, really good points on your perspective.

Thank you also for sharing your tragic miscarriage story. My sister had one before my niece and nephew were born. She told me it made her feel broken.

The reason for posting was because of your miscarriage story. When (and I believe it's inevitable unless the Dems do something politically scary like kill the filibuster....a couple months before the midterms that aren't looking so hot right now) abortion becomes illegal. How do you ensure that you can distinguish between a miscarriage or a self abortion? I'm sure it's unlikely in your or my sister's case since they are married but.... technically they both could be found guilty of an abortion going forward.

Again my biggest concern is the lack of confidence in contingency planning, starting with the acceptance and support of those other options on the menu you listed.

But it's been discussed already enough so I'm not looking for/expecting a reply.

Just wanted to say thanks for the post and bring up the potential miscarriage issue.
On the miscarriage issue, I am not sure. In a case similar to my wife, we found out at a checkup. The baby would have been child #4 for us, so my wife had some experience beforehand on how things were supposed to feel. Something felt off and the doctor confirmed. She had to go and have the baby removed medically. D&C...a process that would probably be similar to an abortion if the baby was still alive but was dead and had to come out before started to decompose in the womb. I feel for your sister. The day it happened my wife wanted to lay in bed. The day after it happened she got a bottle of grey goose and got the most drunk I have seen her before or since.

Listen, I get some of the arguments you guys make. We had 3 children before the miscarriage and one after (my wife really wanted a daughter but 4 was our stopping point), I know how much they change your life. Even being "prepared" for them, you aren't. I agree that it generally is not optimal to be 22 and pregnant and on your own. So I am not against the social safety net that we have in place. I am also not a strict Paul Ryan on the economic side of things. Some of the stuff that has been brought up the past few days about parental leave or universal childcare or things you all have not thought of like universal lunch at school to make sure everybody gets at least one solid (well as solid as school food can be...) meal a day. Most of my family comes from a background that is rooted in a certain faith. My Grandparents were Roosevelt Democrats that evolved away from that party as their focus changed. The Republican Party has had a problem with attracting black voters, even those who share their values. I saw in an article that over 60% of blacks who considered themselves conservative still voted for Hillary Clinton. Respectfully, I think the Democrats have a religious or socially conservative problem that is similar (the two tend to go hand in hand but not always). There is generally an assumption to motivations. I won't say none of us, but the majority of us are not looking for a Handmaid Tale world. I would bet that the majority would also be open to listening to how to help people as long as it was coupled with other things. I think someone up above asked if we should make fathers responsible for helping with costs of prenatal care. Yes! Why would we not? That is the other side of this coin. Women don't get pregnant on their own. I don't agree with forcing sterilization but why would we not enforce parental responsibility on men too?

I am trying to slowly extricate from this conversation by being as fully up front as I can. I am not the furthest right on abortion you can go (rape, incest as close to when it happens as possible and life of mother probably need to be on the table even though the first two are logically inconsistent with the rest of my position) but I am probably the furthest right on the board. I just want to lay it out there what my beliefs truly are. I would say the majority of people who think like me understand where many of you are coming from. We get it. The sticking point is I think that is a human baby and there is no amount of hardship past the three I mentioned that I believe would rise to a level of allowing a mother to unalive (trying to be nice) her own child. It is as wrong to me as the 3/5 compromise was in the constitution. It is dehumanizing and undervaluing actual people.
 
Last edited:
More of the latter. He's Democrat talking point word vomit in every thread.


I believe a parent has all sorts of rights when it comes to their children. Those rights end at a certain point though. We all agree on that. We don't tolerate abuse and we don't tolerate homicide from parents against their children.

Let me repeat that, we don't allow parents to kill their children. We don't allow it if they aren't ready to be parents. We don't allow it if they just don't have the funds. We don't allow it if they are in a bad spot with their mental health. We don't allow it if they have school to finish. We don't allow it if they are scared their child may pass on some disease to them and cause them to die. We don't allow it if they feel that breastfeeding their child makes the child a "parasite". We don't allow it.

So this is not a "both ways" argument. It is a really consistent argument.

I am going to moralize a bit. This country is broke. Just morally bankrupt and the position that the country finds itself in is reflective of that. This is a narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. "But, but conservatives XYZ..." Did I stutter? A narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. And maybe that is just human nature, no, I am pretty sure it is human nature. Responsibility is hard. Deferred gratification is hard. So we choose the "easy" path. Boy has that path been great for us. (DWS in case that was not clear.)

So in answer to a few questions above. I support a social safety net. Sometimes stuff happens. Sometimes we have people in society that are not going to be able to care for themselves like a "normal" adult would. I have a son like that. A piece of the genetic puzzle just didn't click right for him. I will do everything I can to help set him up for when I am gone. Conventional wisdom from many of you would say he doesn't deserve a life. Too expensive, a drain on resources...he's a really sweet kid though. I had a cousin who passed away a few years ago. Cerebral palsy. She went to a home when she hit adulthood. My aunt and uncle just could not do the lifting and moving she required anymore. Her home neglected to monitor some things and she died of an infection. She never could talk. Loved listening to music, would get super upset if anyone said bye. She should have never seen the light of day either. I know the daughter my wife miscarried wasn't a clump of cells. Only girl my wife had and we never got to meet her.

"Abortions aren't fun for women..." Well, the sane ones at least. You want to know why? Because deep down we all know that is a person getting killed. When my wife had to get the D&C with the miscarriage, all the talk went from baby to "fetus". People think that makes it feel better. It didn't. You can try to lie to yourself that something else has happened here, doesn't make it so.

40 million people snuffed out before they ever got a chance. And why? Because some of them weren't going to be like you and me. So they were dehumanized and killed. Some of them were going to be a burden. So the easy path was chosen. 40 million potential stars just snuffed out. 40 million sons and daughters. Brothers and sisters. Future Moms and Dads. Never got a chance. And many of it supported because people have convinced themselves that they were of lesser value. Some because of economics. Some because, hey, me having a good time right now is more important than their life.

Anyways, I am rambling. Several of you on this site and in the culture at large can ridicule and mock me and try and play all the stupid little logic games with me that you want and at the end of the day it amounts to an ant hill. I am 100% comfortable in my position because it is the right position.
This is an excellent post and I respect your opinion on it. And I sympathize with those feelings. I just don't know the answer. I'm not for putting a lifelong responsibility on a person who made a mistake. And yes it's a mistake to that person. So what to do. More PSA's for birth control; incentivize adoptions with remuneration; make adoptions easier. I don't know. Prevention seems the approach. If this nonhormonal male birth control pill works that'll be another preventative measure
 
  • Like
Reactions: larsIU and zeke4ahs
I grew up attending a fairly conservative Christian church, so I’ve known many people who felt this way and I believe they, and you, genuinely feel this way, so I am not going to try to change your mind. I don’t think it’s fair however, to assume everyone shares this belief. I believe life begins at birth, not conception or somewhere in the middle. I believe abortion should be safe and legal. If I thought it akin to murder, I would certainly oppose it in all instances and I’m guessing most people would.

Your assertion that the country is “morally bankrupt” also seems an exaggeration to me. Abortion in some form has likely always existed. Unwanted children were discarded in dumps often enough in the Roman world that they were considered a good source of free slaves. Abortion didn’t start with Roe v Wade and it won’t end if it is struck down.

And miscarriages are a terrible thing. I feel for you on that.
So you’re good with abortion for any reason between conception and birth if I read that correctly. That’s an extremely radical position on abortion. It makes it hard to believe you actually feel anything about a miscarriage if aborting a baby the day before birth is OK with you.
 
On the miscarriage issue, I am not sure. In a case similar to my wife, we found out at a checkup. The baby would have been child #4 for us, so my wife had some experience beforehand on how things were supposed to feel. Something felt off and the doctor confirmed. She had to go and have the baby removed medically. D&C...a process that would probably be similar to an abortion if the baby was still alive but was dead and had to come out before started to decompose in the womb. I feel for your sister. The day it happened my wife wanted to lay in bed. The day after it happened she got a bottle of grey goose and got the most drunk I have seen her before or since.

Listen, I get some of the arguments you guys make. We had 3 children before the miscarriage and one after (my wife really wanted a daughter but 4 was our stopping point), I know how much they change your life. Even being "prepared" for them, you aren't. I agree that it generally is not optimal to be 22 and pregnant and on your own. So I am not against the social safety net that we have in place. I am also not a strict Paul Ryan on the economic side of things. Some of the stuff that has been brought up the past few days about parental leave or universal childcare or things you all have not thought of like universal lunch at school to make sure everybody gets at least one solid (well as solid as school food can be...) meal a day. Most of my family comes from a background that is rooted in a certain faith. My Grandparents were Roosevelt Democrats that evolved away from that party as their focus changed. The Republican Party has had a problem with attracting black voters, even those who share their values. I saw in an article that over 60% of blacks who considered themselves conservative still voted for Hillary Clinton. Respectfully, I think the Democrats have a religious or socially conservative problem that is similar (the two tend to go hand in hand but not always). There is generally an assumption to motivations. I won't say none of us, but the majority of us are not looking for a Handmaid Tale world. I would bet that the majority would also be open to listening to how to help people as long as it was coupled with other things. I think someone up above asked if we should make fathers responsible for helping with costs of prenatal care. Yes! Why would we not? That is the other side of this coin. Women don't get pregnant on their own. I don't agree with forcing sterilization but why would we not enforce parental responsibility on men too?

I am trying to slowly extricate from this conversation by being as fully up front as I can. I am not the furthest right on abortion you can go (rape, incest as close to when it happens as possible and life of mother probably need to be on the table even though the first two are logically inconsistent with the rest of my position) but I am probably the furthest right on the board. I just want to lay it out there what my beliefs truly are. I would say the majority of people who think like me understand where many of you are coming from. We get it. The sticking point is I think that is a human baby and there is no amount of hardship past the three I mentioned that I believe would rise to a level of allowing a mother to unalive (trying to be nice) her own child. It is as wrong to me as the 3/5 compromise was in the constitution. It is dehumanizing and undervaluing actual people.
The slave holding states wanted each slave to count as one person for the purposes of representation. The free states wanted to only count free persons, including black persons, and not count slaves. 3/5 was a compromise for representation purposes, not a valuation of slaves as people.

My wife also had a miscarriage and a D&C. Because of some damage from the D&C she couldn’t have another baby. We wanted two, but had one. She’s been pretty well spoiled. ;)
 
More of the latter. He's Democrat talking point word vomit in every thread.


I believe a parent has all sorts of rights when it comes to their children. Those rights end at a certain point though. We all agree on that. We don't tolerate abuse and we don't tolerate homicide from parents against their children.

Let me repeat that, we don't allow parents to kill their children. We don't allow it if they aren't ready to be parents. We don't allow it if they just don't have the funds. We don't allow it if they are in a bad spot with their mental health. We don't allow it if they have school to finish. We don't allow it if they are scared their child may pass on some disease to them and cause them to die. We don't allow it if they feel that breastfeeding their child makes the child a "parasite". We don't allow it.

So this is not a "both ways" argument. It is a really consistent argument.

I am going to moralize a bit. This country is broke. Just morally bankrupt and the position that the country finds itself in is reflective of that. This is a narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. "But, but conservatives XYZ..." Did I stutter? A narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. And maybe that is just human nature, no, I am pretty sure it is human nature. Responsibility is hard. Deferred gratification is hard. So we choose the "easy" path. Boy has that path been great for us. (DWS in case that was not clear.)

So in answer to a few questions above. I support a social safety net. Sometimes stuff happens. Sometimes we have people in society that are not going to be able to care for themselves like a "normal" adult would. I have a son like that. A piece of the genetic puzzle just didn't click right for him. I will do everything I can to help set him up for when I am gone. Conventional wisdom from many of you would say he doesn't deserve a life. Too expensive, a drain on resources...he's a really sweet kid though. I had a cousin who passed away a few years ago. Cerebral palsy. She went to a home when she hit adulthood. My aunt and uncle just could not do the lifting and moving she required anymore. Her home neglected to monitor some things and she died of an infection. She never could talk. Loved listening to music, would get super upset if anyone said bye. She should have never seen the light of day either. I know the daughter my wife miscarried wasn't a clump of cells. Only girl my wife had and we never got to meet her.

"Abortions aren't fun for women..." Well, the sane ones at least. You want to know why? Because deep down we all know that is a person getting killed. When my wife had to get the D&C with the miscarriage, all the talk went from baby to "fetus". People think that makes it feel better. It didn't. You can try to lie to yourself that something else has happened here, doesn't make it so.

40 million people snuffed out before they ever got a chance. And why? Because some of them weren't going to be like you and me. So they were dehumanized and killed. Some of them were going to be a burden. So the easy path was chosen. 40 million potential stars just snuffed out. 40 million sons and daughters. Brothers and sisters. Future Moms and Dads. Never got a chance. And many of it supported because people have convinced themselves that they were of lesser value. Some because of economics. Some because, hey, me having a good time right now is more important than their life.

Anyways, I am rambling. Several of you on this site and in the culture at large can ridicule and mock me and try and play all the stupid little logic games with me that you want and at the end of the day it amounts to an ant hill. I am 100% comfortable in my position because it is the right position.
You are entitled to your opinion and belief. While I may not share your opinion or belief in full, you are honest, genuine, and brave to share your life story, which I have to respect. Debate covers a full spectrum, and debate needs people like you. You do have point.
 
The slave holding states wanted each slave to count as one person for the purposes of representation. The free states wanted to only count free persons, including black persons, and not count slaves. 3/5 was a compromise for representation purposes, not a valuation of slaves as people.

My wife also had a miscarriage and a D&C. Because of some damage from the D&C she couldn’t have another baby. We wanted two, but had one. She’s been pretty well spoiled. ;)
OH I know the history of the 3/5 compromise. In the long run it helped to control the power of slave holding states in the House, however, it was still counting slaves as 60% of a person.
 
More of the latter. He's Democrat talking point word vomit in every thread.


I believe a parent has all sorts of rights when it comes to their children. Those rights end at a certain point though. We all agree on that. We don't tolerate abuse and we don't tolerate homicide from parents against their children.

Let me repeat that, we don't allow parents to kill their children. We don't allow it if they aren't ready to be parents. We don't allow it if they just don't have the funds. We don't allow it if they are in a bad spot with their mental health. We don't allow it if they have school to finish. We don't allow it if they are scared their child may pass on some disease to them and cause them to die. We don't allow it if they feel that breastfeeding their child makes the child a "parasite". We don't allow it.

So this is not a "both ways" argument. It is a really consistent argument.

I am going to moralize a bit. This country is broke. Just morally bankrupt and the position that the country finds itself in is reflective of that. This is a narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. "But, but conservatives XYZ..." Did I stutter? A narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. And maybe that is just human nature, no, I am pretty sure it is human nature. Responsibility is hard. Deferred gratification is hard. So we choose the "easy" path. Boy has that path been great for us. (DWS in case that was not clear.)

So in answer to a few questions above. I support a social safety net. Sometimes stuff happens. Sometimes we have people in society that are not going to be able to care for themselves like a "normal" adult would. I have a son like that. A piece of the genetic puzzle just didn't click right for him. I will do everything I can to help set him up for when I am gone. Conventional wisdom from many of you would say he doesn't deserve a life. Too expensive, a drain on resources...he's a really sweet kid though. I had a cousin who passed away a few years ago. Cerebral palsy. She went to a home when she hit adulthood. My aunt and uncle just could not do the lifting and moving she required anymore. Her home neglected to monitor some things and she died of an infection. She never could talk. Loved listening to music, would get super upset if anyone said bye. She should have never seen the light of day either. I know the daughter my wife miscarried wasn't a clump of cells. Only girl my wife had and we never got to meet her.

"Abortions aren't fun for women..." Well, the sane ones at least. You want to know why? Because deep down we all know that is a person getting killed. When my wife had to get the D&C with the miscarriage, all the talk went from baby to "fetus". People think that makes it feel better. It didn't. You can try to lie to yourself that something else has happened here, doesn't make it so.

40 million people snuffed out before they ever got a chance. And why? Because some of them weren't going to be like you and me. So they were dehumanized and killed. Some of them were going to be a burden. So the easy path was chosen. 40 million potential stars just snuffed out. 40 million sons and daughters. Brothers and sisters. Future Moms and Dads. Never got a chance. And many of it supported because people have convinced themselves that they were of lesser value. Some because of economics. Some because, hey, me having a good time right now is more important than their life.

Anyways, I am rambling. Several of you on this site and in the culture at large can ridicule and mock me and try and play all the stupid little logic games with me that you want and at the end of the day it amounts to an ant hill. I am 100% comfortable in my position because it is the right position.
This is a really cogent, thoughtful, heartfelt, and honest post. I’m just so grateful you shared that and I got to read it.

I think your post and reasoning shows how difficult this issue is. There are counter issues and arguments on the other side but when it comes to weighing them, I find it impossibly difficult.
 
More of the latter. He's Democrat talking point word vomit in every thread.


I believe a parent has all sorts of rights when it comes to their children. Those rights end at a certain point though. We all agree on that. We don't tolerate abuse and we don't tolerate homicide from parents against their children.

Let me repeat that, we don't allow parents to kill their children. We don't allow it if they aren't ready to be parents. We don't allow it if they just don't have the funds. We don't allow it if they are in a bad spot with their mental health. We don't allow it if they have school to finish. We don't allow it if they are scared their child may pass on some disease to them and cause them to die. We don't allow it if they feel that breastfeeding their child makes the child a "parasite". We don't allow it.

So this is not a "both ways" argument. It is a really consistent argument.

I am going to moralize a bit. This country is broke. Just morally bankrupt and the position that the country finds itself in is reflective of that. This is a narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. "But, but conservatives XYZ..." Did I stutter? A narcissistic, self indulgent, hateful place. And maybe that is just human nature, no, I am pretty sure it is human nature. Responsibility is hard. Deferred gratification is hard. So we choose the "easy" path. Boy has that path been great for us. (DWS in case that was not clear.)

So in answer to a few questions above. I support a social safety net. Sometimes stuff happens. Sometimes we have people in society that are not going to be able to care for themselves like a "normal" adult would. I have a son like that. A piece of the genetic puzzle just didn't click right for him. I will do everything I can to help set him up for when I am gone. Conventional wisdom from many of you would say he doesn't deserve a life. Too expensive, a drain on resources...he's a really sweet kid though. I had a cousin who passed away a few years ago. Cerebral palsy. She went to a home when she hit adulthood. My aunt and uncle just could not do the lifting and moving she required anymore. Her home neglected to monitor some things and she died of an infection. She never could talk. Loved listening to music, would get super upset if anyone said bye. She should have never seen the light of day either. I know the daughter my wife miscarried wasn't a clump of cells. Only girl my wife had and we never got to meet her.

"Abortions aren't fun for women..." Well, the sane ones at least. You want to know why? Because deep down we all know that is a person getting killed. When my wife had to get the D&C with the miscarriage, all the talk went from baby to "fetus". People think that makes it feel better. It didn't. You can try to lie to yourself that something else has happened here, doesn't make it so.

40 million people snuffed out before they ever got a chance. And why? Because some of them weren't going to be like you and me. So they were dehumanized and killed. Some of them were going to be a burden. So the easy path was chosen. 40 million potential stars just snuffed out. 40 million sons and daughters. Brothers and sisters. Future Moms and Dads. Never got a chance. And many of it supported because people have convinced themselves that they were of lesser value. Some because of economics. Some because, hey, me having a good time right now is more important than their life.

Anyways, I am rambling. Several of you on this site and in the culture at large can ridicule and mock me and try and play all the stupid little logic games with me that you want and at the end of the day it amounts to an ant hill. I am 100% comfortable in my position because it is the right position.
Thanks for writing that.

The question that I cannot answer, when do we have human life. The Catholic Church says at the moment the sperm penetrates the egg. That is a point, and I appreciate they have the view, but I don't think that moment works for me. And it eliminates some effective birth control.

This exact same debate happens on the other end, Terry Schaivo. She clearly looked human in every exterior way. But I cannot help but think we were not doing anyone a service keeping her on life support for years.

The number and rate of abortions have dropped considerably since the 80s. I know the progress is not nearly at the speed you would want. But I am hopeful that birth control is the ticket out from this debate. Fewer people seem to object to birth control.
 
So you’re good with abortion for any reason between conception and birth if I read that correctly. That’s an extremely radical position on abortion. It makes it hard to believe you actually feel anything about a miscarriage if aborting a baby the day before birth is OK with you.
I’m with the 60% of Americans who believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases. There may be reasonable limitations within a certain timeframe but I couldn’t sit here and tell you what they are. I’m not sure why you find it difficult to believe I could “feel anything about a miscarriage.” You mostly seem like a reasonable guy, so I will say that your inference feels to me a bit like you have said being called a racist in here feels to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
Thanks for writing that.

The question that I cannot answer, when do we have human life. The Catholic Church says at the moment the sperm penetrates the egg. That is a point, and I appreciate they have the view, but I don't think that moment works for me. And it eliminates some effective birth control.

This exact same debate happens on the other end, Terry Schaivo. She clearly looked human in every exterior way. But I cannot help but think we were not doing anyone a service keeping her on life support for years.

The number and rate of abortions have dropped considerably since the 80s. I know the progress is not nearly at the speed you would want. But I am hopeful that birth control is the ticket out from this debate. Fewer people seem to object to birth control.
My guess is the abortion pill has driven the decline. Is that tracked?
 
I’m with the 60% of Americans who believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases. There may be reasonable limitations within a certain timeframe but I couldn’t sit here and tell you what they are. I’m not sure why you find it difficult to believe I could “feel anything about a miscarriage.” You mostly seem like a reasonable guy, so I will say that your inference feels to me a bit like you have said being called a racist in here feels to you.
No you’re not. Your position is a radical one. Look closer and you’ll find the majority of Americans believe that second and third trimester abortions should be restricted. The overwhelming majority think this way more strongly about third trimester abortions. You might want to rethink your stance. My wife was born almost three months early. She’s perfectly healthy now, thank you, but your position is that she could have been aborted and you’d be OK with it. Again, that’s radical, not mainstream.
 
My guess is the abortion pill has driven the decline. Is that tracked?
I do not know. I googled the other day and saw a confluence of suggestions. The number began dropping about 90, I think that is before that pill. But it got credit, as well as a general decrease in sex among kids.
 
No you’re not. Your position is a radical one. Look closer and you’ll find the majority of Americans believe that second and third trimester abortions should be restricted. The overwhelming majority think this way more strongly about third trimester abortions. You might want to rethink your stance. My wife was born almost three months early. She’s perfectly healthy now, thank you, but your position is that she could have been aborted and you’d be OK with it. Again, that’s radical, not mainstream.
There may indeed be instances in the third trimester when abortion should not be allowed. I won’t claim to be an expert on the subject. I prefer abortion to be legal in most instances but if you and I were in a smoke-filled room trying to come up with a compromise, we could probably say banned after 24 weeks or the life of the mother is at risk (or other extenuating circumstances I may not be thinking about) and be done with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
The left is galvanized because of the content in the leak not because of The party which leaked it.
Without the leak, there is no content to galvanize the fund raising. Can you seriously say that with intellectual honesty: if the White House maintains their focus on the content; rather than the huge ramifications of someone actually leaking ANYTHING from SCOTUS? Another point, Conservatives hold the US Constitution in far greater gravitas than liberals do.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bulk VanderHuge
Without the leak, there is no content to galvanize the fund raising. Can you seriously say that with intellectual honesty: if the White House maintains their focus on the content; rather than the huge ramifications of someone actually leaking ANYTHING from SCOTUS? Another point, Conservatives hold the US Constitution in far greater gravitas than liberals do.
I’m just saying your argument doesn’t hold water. The leak was long after the opinion was formulated and not long before it would become public anyway. For fundraising reasons it would make sense to leak it long ago.
 
*caterwauling

I don't think 1/6 was the end of democracy. I do think it's a bigger deal than a leak, even a leak that is a pretty big deal itself among leaks, as this one is.
I bow to your superior knowledge of caterwauling.

Your take on 1/6 doesn't jibe with the majority of your party. It's all hysteria all the time about 1/6.

And yet, the White House can't bring itself to make a statement comemning the doxing of Supreme Court Justices. Shameful.
 
I grew up attending a fairly conservative Christian church, so I’ve known many people who felt this way and I believe they, and you, genuinely feel this way, so I am not going to try to change your mind. I don’t think it’s fair however, to assume everyone shares this belief. I believe life begins at birth, not conception or somewhere in the middle. I believe abortion should be safe and legal. If I thought it akin to murder, I would certainly oppose it in all instances and I’m guessing most people would.

Your assertion that the country is “morally bankrupt” also seems an exaggeration to me. Abortion in some form has likely always existed. Unwanted children were discarded in dumps often enough in the Roman world that they were considered a good source of free slaves. Abortion didn’t start with Roe v Wade and it won’t end if it is struck down.

And miscarriages are a terrible thing. I feel for you on that.
You believe life starts at conception and yet you still want abortion to be safe an legal?

I don't see how you square the 2 beliefs. If it's not murder, what is it?
 
The first issue is we don't know the who or the why behind the leak.

Hell it might have been a hack which makes it a security issue that needs to be fixed vs mob justice.
You don't know the final ruling, either, but that doesn't keep you from getting worked up about it.
 
You don't know the final ruling, either, but that doesn't keep you from getting worked up about it.
We may not know the final rationale or the final vote of the justices, but I think we do know the final ruling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bub-rub
Totally criminal to try to influence a judge's decsion.

Can you imagine if it was some conservative protesting in front of Sotomayor or Kagan's house?
No I can't. Like I said in my early post this morning. People are getting tired of the progressive left Dan as you know. So I guess the people that argue with us most on this board must be progressive idiots that love an authoritarian, out of control, leadership because thats what this is, at every turn, and every day it gets worse. Everything we have been complaining about is getting exposed. Let the left melt on national TV in front of these judges homes it will piss true Americans off.

Meanwhile 2000 Mules is out and has exposed a complete COUP and a mob run organization that needs to be investigated. The Mules need to be put in jail immediately. They are on video clearly breaking the law!

Ohhhh and Go Durham the Clintons attorneys and the Clintons must turn over all the documents they shared. Durham has been getting cooperation finally. There are enough patriots in these organizations to call out the rats and get things back to normal. I just hope they can do it!
 
No I can't. Like I said in my early post this morning. People are getting tired of the progressive left Dan as you know. So I guess the people that argue with us most on this board must be progressive idiots that love an authoritarian, out of control, leadership because thats what this is, at every turn, and every day it gets worse. Everything we have been complaining about is getting exposed. Let the left melt on national TV in front of these judges homes it will piss true Americans off.

Meanwhile 2000 Mules is out and has exposed a complete COUP and a mob run organization that needs to be investigated. The Mules need to be put in jail immediately. They are on video clearly breaking the law!

Ohhhh and Go Durham the Clintons attorneys and the Clintons must turn over all the documents they shared. Durham has been getting cooperation finally. There are enough patriots in these organizations to call out the rats and get things back to normal. I just hope they can do it!
I've yet to watch 2000 Mules, but hope to soon.

If it shows what is reported - that 'mules' were tracked dumping ballots in drop-off boxes by video and cell phone tracking, that should be enough proof for any judge to look at.

Of course, we know any evidence coming from a conservative will be poo-poo'd and ignored, while any rumors spread by leftists will be considered Gospel.
 
Thanks for writing that.

The question that I cannot answer, when do we have human life. The Catholic Church says at the moment the sperm penetrates the egg. That is a point, and I appreciate they have the view, but I don't think that moment works for me. And it eliminates some effective birth control.

This exact same debate happens on the other end, Terry Schaivo. She clearly looked human in every exterior way. But I cannot help but think we were not doing anyone a service keeping her on life support for years.

The number and rate of abortions have dropped considerably since the 80s. I know the progress is not nearly at the speed you would want. But I am hopeful that birth control is the ticket out from this debate. Fewer people seem to object to birth control.
Have you looked at the percentage of black babies being aborted vs white ones?

Do you not see the underlying justification for abortion here?
 
What???

But that's a good way to not answer my question.
You sound like you are equating Hitler to the murdered doctor: am I wrong?

You are also pretty fired up about a nonviolent protest, but pro-lifers have been killing doctors, setting fire to and vandalizing abortion clinics, protesting abortion clinics, and harassing women that go to abortion clinics for 50 years. That is a pretty serious double standard.
 
You sound like you are equating Hitler to the murdered doctor: am I wrong?

You are also pretty fired up about a nonviolent protest, but pro-lifers have been killing doctors, setting fire to and vandalizing abortion clinics, protesting abortion clinics, and harassing women that go to abortion clinics for 50 years. That is a pretty serious double standard.
No, I'm not and don't play stupid. Just answer my question. Why are you avoiding it?

Non-violent protests are fine, but you cannot try to influence a judge's decision.

Aren't those pro-lifers who do such thing doing time in prison for their violent actions? As far as "harrassing" women, that's just peaceful protesting, isn't it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT