Peter Strzok & Lisa Page

[SuperHoosierFan]

What do you Liberals have to say about these two characters? No way is mueller‘s investigation is honest.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html

 

[Marvin the Martian]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/31/politics/strzok-fbi-comey-clinton-letter/index.html

Shhh, don't ruin the narrative.

 

[Cortez88]

I guess they’ll have to go back to George Soros as the liberal boogeyman.

 

[Cortez88]

Damn. This is a bad day to be a right wing conspiracy theorist. It appears the deep state may not be the liberal boogeyman, or at least according to that den of liberal snakes at the WSJ:

“The Wall Street Journal read through 7,000 text messages from FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who have been intensely criticized after it emerged they had exchanged anti-Trump texts while Strzok was investigating Hillary Clinton and later Donald Trump. WSJ concluded that the "texts critical of Mr. Trump represent a fraction of the roughly 7,000 messages, which stretch across 384 pages and show no evidence of a conspiracy against Mr. Trump."

 

[SuperHoosierFan]

Damn. This is a bad day to be a right wing conspiracy theorist. It appears the deep state may not be the liberal boogeyman, or at least according to that den of liberal snakes at the WSJ:

“The Wall Street Journal read through 7,000 text messages from FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who have been intensely criticized after it emerged they had exchanged anti-Trump texts while Strzok was investigating Hillary Clinton and later Donald Trump. WSJ concluded that the "texts critical of Mr. Trump represent a fraction of the roughly 7,000 messages, which stretch across 384 pages and show no evidence of a conspiracy against Mr. Trump."

That just proves the WSJ is in on the conspiracy.