It's UK (or UNC... or AL, or UT... ), of course they won't get involved!. Again, if it's the agent, it's settled in 5 minutes: email over the receipt and we're good. I'm just saying it should merit a check to verify it's not from a booster. And, on the bigger picture, it's the NCAA and we're still talking about (cough, cough), student-athletes. It wouldn't do any harm to figure out a way to keep them from withdrawing from school before the end of the year and forfeit, half of their college education to date.
Oh, and there is precedent. Lance Thomas was investigated because he bought a bunch of jewelry a few years back. Similar situation. Part of the NCAA's duty is policing to insure it's rules are followed and a case like this should merit a check. I know, it's silly things like rules and impropriety that folks at UK don't like to get involved with or think about, but it still doesn't mean it would hurt to find a way to see if we can get kids more education. SMH indeed.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...ce-thomas-cleared-wrongdoing-jewelry-purchase