Wouldn't it be weird if Oregon, SMU, and Texas all won Conference Titles in their first year in each respective League? To what could that be attributed? Maybe having systems that don't fit the Conference mold and not having a lot of tape to evaluate (in the context of League Play I mean)? Is it some strange anomaly? Not sure what to make of it.
I thought it was appropriate that Indiana thumped UCLA the way they did as a welcome to the B1G. I think it would also be fitting if Penn State ruined the party for the Quack-attack Saturday.
I'm pulling for SMU, not out of some sense of loyalty to the old guard in the ACC, I like SMU to begin with and I don't like Clemson. Complex reasoning, I know.
Lastly I would find it especially funny and satisfying if Texas won the SEC. I don't think any explanation is required here.
I thought it was appropriate that Indiana thumped UCLA the way they did as a welcome to the B1G. I think it would also be fitting if Penn State ruined the party for the Quack-attack Saturday.
I'm pulling for SMU, not out of some sense of loyalty to the old guard in the ACC, I like SMU to begin with and I don't like Clemson. Complex reasoning, I know.
Lastly I would find it especially funny and satisfying if Texas won the SEC. I don't think any explanation is required here.